Abstract
Genetic improvement of productivity in livestock has been very successful in the past. Improvement of traits related to fitness, such as health, fertility and disease resistance, however, has proven more difficult. Reasons are (i) low heritabilities, (ii) difficulty to record traits related to fitness, (iii) genotype by environment interaction, e.g. between commercial and breeding environment, (iv) presence of heritable effects other than the direct genetic effect of the individual itself. This paper argues that improvement of fitness related traits is not fundamentally different from improvement of other traits. Important factors are (i) the identification of all heritable components affecting trait values, (ii) the collection of phenotypic data from commercial environments combined with marker assisted estimation of breeding values (so-called “genomic selection”). Marker assisted breeding value estimation does not threaten genetic diversity, and is operationally much easier to use than methods based on QTL mapping. The paper concludes with a section on heritable social interactions among individuals. Results show that heritable social interactions represent an extra level of variation which may increase the heritable variation available to breeders to values considerably higher than the usual additive genetic variance. First results in pigs and poultry are promising, but more data analysis is needed to substantiate the relevance of heritable social interactions in other species.
Chapter PDF
References
Arango, J., Misztal, I., Tsuruta, S., Culbertson, M. and Herring, W.O. 2005. Estimation of variance components including competitive effects of Large White growing gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1241–1246.
Arango, J., Misztal, I., Tsuruta, S., Culbertson, W., Herring, W.O. and Long, T. 2006. Competitive genetic effects in large white growing gilts. Proc. 8th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. Comm. No. 06–24.
Bijma, P., Muir, W.M. and Van Arendonk, J.A.M. 2007a. Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175: 277–288.
Bijma, P., Muir, W.M., Ellen, E.D., Wolf, J.B. and Van Arendonk, J.A.M. 2007b. Multilevel selection 2: estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175: 289–299.
Denison, R.F., Kiers, E.T. and West, S.A. 2003. Darwinian agriculture: when can humans find solutions beyond the reach of natural selection? Quart. Rev. Biol. 78: 145–168.
De Jong, G. 1993. Covariances between traits deriving from successive allocation of resources. Functional Ecol. 7: 75–83.
Ellen, E.D., Muir, W.M., Teuscher, F. and Bijma, P. 2007. Genetic improvement of traits affected by interactions among individuals: sib selection schemes. Genetics 176: 489–499.
Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, Pearson Education Ltd., Harlow, Essex, UK.
Frank, S.A. 1998. Foundations of social evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B.J., Cullis, B.R., Welham, S.J. and Thompson, R. 2002. ASReml User Guide Release 1.0, VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK (http://www.vsn-intl.com/.)
Griffing, B. 1967. Selection in reference to biological groups. I. Individual and group selection applied to populations of unordered groups. Australian J. Biol. Sci. 20: 127.
Griffing, B. 1976. Selection in reference to biological groups. VI. Use of extreme forms of non-random groups to increase selection efficiency. Genetics 82: 476–490.
Hadfield, J.D. and Wilson, A.J. 2007. Multilevel selection 3: modeling the effects of interacting individuals as a function of group size. Genetics 177: 667–668.
Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1–16.
Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
Meuwissen, T.H.E. 1997. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J. Anim. Sci. 75(4):934–940.
Meuwissen, T.H.E. and Goddard, M.E. 1996. The use of marker haplotypes in animal breeding schemes. Genet. Sel. Evol. 28: 161–178.
Meuwissen, T.H.E. and Goddard, M.E. 1997. Selection for non-linear traits and profit. Anim. Sci. 65: 1–8.
Meuwissen, T.H.E., Hayes, B.J. and Goddard, M.E. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819–1829.
Michod, R.E. 1999. Darwinian dynamics: Evolutionary transitions in fitness and individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Muir, W.M. and Aggrey, S.E. 2003. Poultry genetics, breeding and biotechnology, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
Muir, W.M. 1996. Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. Poult. Sci. 75: 447–458.
Muir, W.M. 2005. Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs. Genetics 170: 1247–1259.
Rauw, W.M., Knap, P.W., Verstegen, M.W.A. and Luiting, P. 2002. Food resource allocation patterns in lactating females in a long-term selection experiment for litter size in mice. Genet. Sel. Evol. 34: 83–104.
Rice, S.H. 2004. Evolutionary theory; mathematical and conceptual foundations, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
Sonesson, A.K. and Meuwissen, T.H.E. 2000. Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding. Genet. Sel. Evol. 32: 231–248.
Thrall, P.H. and Burdon, J.J. 1997. Host-pathogen dynamics in metapopulation context: the ecological and evolutionary consequences of being spatial. J. Ecol. 85: 743–753.
Van der Waaij, E.H. 2004. A resource allocation model describing consequences of artificial selection under metabolic stress. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 973–981.
Weber, K.E. and Diggins, L.T. 1990. Increased selection response in larger populations. II. Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes. Genetics 125: 585–597.
West-Eberhard, M.J. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Wilham, R.L. 1963. The covariance between relatives for characters composed of components contributed by related individuals. Biometrics 19:18–27.
Wolf, J.B., Brodie, E.D. III, Cheverud, J.M., Mooreand, A.J. and Wade, M.J. 1998. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 64–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bijma, P. (2009). Maintaining Fitness by Within Breed Selection. In: van der Werf, J., Graser, HU., Frankham, R., Gondro, C. (eds) Adaptation and Fitness in Animal Populations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9005-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9005-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9004-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9005-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)