Skip to main content

Stuart Barker’s Contributions to Population Genetics and Animal Breeding: Exploring Fitness, Evolution and Animal Genetics

  • Chapter
  • 1628 Accesses

Abstract

Stuart Barker’s initial contributions to genetics during the mid-1950s were down-to-earth instructive articles on genotype-by-environment interaction in cattle and random-sample tests for chicken strains, and pedigree analyses of Australian cattle breeds. Taking up a lectureship in animal genetics at the University of Sydney, Stuart rapidly became involved in experimental population genetics research with Drosophila. He also conducted some of the first Monte Carlo simulations of genetics, using SILLIAC~– Australia’s second automatic computer. During a year’s sabbatical, Stuart performed some innovative quantitative genetic analyses of English dairy data (working with Alan Robertson) and was further stimulated in New York working with Theodosius Dobzhansky on the genetics of natural populations. Returning to Sydney, Stuart gathered a fine group of postgraduate students who used Drosophila to conduct comprehensive investigations of many aspects of artificial selection for quantitative traits. In 1970, Stuart was introduced to a powerful natural model (the cactus-yeast-Drosophila system) that has proven to be a particularly rich source of both field and laboratory experiments, aimed primarily at identifying the selective forces that maintain genetic polymorphisms in natural populations. On moving to the University of New England in 1979, Stuart became involved in important research on resistance and resilience to internal parasites in sheep. At about the same time, Stuart became heavily involved with the characterisation and management of domestic animal diversity, contributing to many FAO meetings and committees, and collaborating widely throughout Asia in measuring domestic animal diversity. Although now ten years into retirement, Stuart continues to conduct research and publish papers, primarily on the Drosophila-cactus-yeast system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albers, G.A.A., Gray, G.D., Piper, L.R., Barker, J.S.F., Le Jambre, L.F. and Barger I.A. 1987. The genetics of resistance and resilience to haemonchus-contortus infection in young Merino sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 17: 1355–1363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1955. The problem of environment and breed improvement. Queensland Agricultural Journal 80: 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1956. Are egg-laying competitions outmoded? Queensland Agricultural Journal 82: 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1957a. The breed structure and genetic analysis of the pedigree cattle breeds in Australia. I. The Jersey. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 561–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1957b. Expansion and distribution of the pedigree Jersey breed in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 547–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1958a. Simulation of genetic systems by automatic digital computers. III. Selection between alleles at an autosomal locus. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 11: 603–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1958b. Simulation of genetic systems by automatic digital computers. IV. Selection between alleles at a sex-linked locus. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 11: 613–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1959. The breed structure and genetic analysis of the pedigree cattle breeds in\break Australia. I. The Jersey: a correction. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10: 769–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1960a. Yet another population cage. Drosophila Information Service 34: 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1960b. An adaptation of the population bottle of Reed and Reed (1948). Drosophila Information Service 34: 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1960c. PhD Thesis The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations and related studies in population genetics. University of Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1962a. Estimation of generation interval in experimental populations of Drosophila. Genetical Research 3: 388–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1962b. Sexual isolation between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. American Naturalist 96: 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1962c. Studies of selective mating using yellow mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 47: 623–640.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1963a. Estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. 2. Experimental evaluation of factors affecting fitness. Evolution 17: 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1963b. The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. 3. The fitness of certain strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 17: 138–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1967. Modern problems of population genetics in animal husbandry. Der Zuchter 37: 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. 1979. Inter-locus interactions: A review of experimental evidence. Theoretical Population Biology 16: 323–346.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Allingham, D.H. 1959. Migration of pedigree Jersey cattle in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10: 749–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Burton, H.W. 1956. Report on the Queensland random sample poultry production trial. Queensland Agricultural Journal 82: 456–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Cummins, L.J. 1969a. Disruptive selection for sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 61: 697–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Cummins, L.J. 1969b. Effect of selection for sternopleural bristle number on mating behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 61: 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Davern, C.I. 1956. The mutagenic action of formaldehyde on Drosophila melanogaster. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 8: 382–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Davey, G.P. 1960. The breed structure and genetic analysis of the pedigree cattle breeds in Australia. II. The Poll Hereford. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 11: 1072–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and East P.D. 1980. Evidence for selection following perturbation of allozyme frequencies in a natural population of Drosophila. Nature 284: 166–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F., East, P.D. and Weir, B.S. 1986b. Temporal and microgeographic variation in allozyme frequencies in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics 112: 577–611.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Karlsson, L.J. 1974. Effects of population-size and selection intensity on responses to disruptive selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 78: 715–735.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F., Moore, S.S., Hetzel, D.J.S., Evans, D., Tan, S.G. and Byrne, K. 1997. Genetic diversity of Asian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): Microsatellite variation and a comparison with protein-coding loci. Animal Genetics 28: 103–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Mulley, J.C. 1976. Isozyme variation in natural populations of Drosophila bzzatii. Evolution 30: 213–233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Podger, R.N. 1970a. Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans – Effects of larval density and shortterm adult starvation on fecundity, egg hatchability and adult viability. Ecology 51: 855–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Podger, R.N. 1970b. Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans – Effects of larval density on viability, developmental period and adult body weight. Ecology 51: 170–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Robertson, A. 1966. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for first 3 lactations in Friesian cows. Animal Production 8: 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F. and Starmer, W.T. 1999. Environmental effects and the genetics of oviposition preference for natural yeast substrates in Drosophila buzzatii. Hereditas 130: 145–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J.S.F., Vacek, D.C., East, P.D. and Starmer, W.T. 1986a. Allozyme genotypes of Drosophila buzzatii: feeding and oviposition preferences for microbial species, and habitat selection. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 39: 47–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, D.A., Malpica, J.M., Robertson, A., Smith, G.J., Frankham, R., Banks, R.G. and Barker, J.S.F. 1992. Rapid loss of genetic variation in large captive populations of Drosophila flies – Implications for the genetic management of captive populations. Conservation Biology 6: 416–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, M.M. 2007. Cactoblastis cactorum the Miracle Bug. M.M. Cameron, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claringbold, P.J. and Barker, J.S.F. 1961. Estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1: 190–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clunies-Ross, I. 1932. Observations on the resistance of sheep to infestations by the stomach worm Hameonchus contortus. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research 5: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., Krimbas, C. and Krimbas, M.G. 1960. Genetics of natural populations. XXX. Is the genetic load in Drosophila pseudoobscura a mutational or a balanced load? Genetics 45: 741–753.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. and Pavlovsky, O. 1953. Indeterminate outcome of certain experiments on Drosophila populations. Evolution 7: 198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. and Queal, M.L. 1938. Genetics of natural populations. I. Chromsome variation in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 23: 239–251.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S. 1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2007. The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (B. Rischkowsky and D. Pilling, eds.). Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamand, J.R.B., Vankan, D., Gairhe, K.P., Duong, H. and Barker, J.S.F. 2003. Genetic identification of wild Asian water buffalo in Nepal. Animal Conservation 6: 265–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R., Jones L.P. and Barker, J.S.F. 1968a. Effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. 1. Short-term response to selection. Genetical Research 12: 237–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R., Jones L.P. and Barker, J.S.F. 1968b. Effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. 3. Analyses of lines. Genetical Research 12: 267–283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, I., Grigg, G. and Mayo, O. 2004. James Meadows Rendel 1915–2001. Historical Records of Australian Science 15: 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A.S. 1957a. Simulation of genetic systems by automatic digital computers. I. Introduction. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 10: 484–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A.S. 1957b. Simulation of genetic systems by automatic digital computers. II. Effects of linkage on rates of advance under selection. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 10: 492–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A.S. 1958. Monte Carlo analyses of genetic models. Nature 181: 208–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A., Miller, D. and Burnell, D. 1965. Polygenic balance. Nature 206: 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, C.S. and de Koning, D.J. 2007. Towards in vitro genetics. Trends in Genetics 23: 382–386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, K. 1974. Drosophila as an experimental model in animal breeding research. Proceedings of the First World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 1: 425–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris H. 1966. Enzyme polymorphism in man. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 164: 298–310.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingdale, B. and Barker, J.S.F. 1971a. Selection for increased abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster with concurrent irradiation. 1. Populations derived from an inbred line. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 41: 208–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingdale, B. and Barker, J.S.F. 1971b. Selection for increased abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster with concurrent irradiation. 2. Populations derived from an outbred cage population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 41: 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubby, J.L. and Lewontin R.C. 1966. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. I. The number of alleles at different loci in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 54: 577–594.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L.P., Frankham, R. and Barker, J.S.F. 1968. Effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. 2. Long-term response to selection. Genetical Research 12: 249–266.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J. 1970. Cacti naturalised in Australia and their Control, S.G. Reid, Government Printer Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, D.A. and Batterham, P. 1993. Australian genetics: a brief history. Genetica 90: 81–114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moth, J.J. and Barker, J.S.F. 1976. Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans – Reduction in fecundity and destruction of eggs when medium is inhabited by larvae. Oecologia 23: 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moth, J.J. and Barker, J.S.F. 1977. Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans – Effects of adult density on adult viability. Genetica 47: 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moth, J.J. and Barker, J.S.F. 1981. Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans – Effects of adult density, species frequency, light, and dietary P-32 on fecundity. Physiological Zoology 54: 28–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulley, J.C., James, J.W. and Barker, J.S.F. 1979. Allozyme genotype-environment relationships in natural populations of Drosophila buzzatii. Biochemical Genetics 17: 105–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T. and Barker, J.S.F. 1989. Ecological aspects of the heritability of body size in Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics 123: 803–813.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T. and Barker, J.S.F. 1993. F-statistics in Drosophila buzzatii: selection, population size and inbreeding. Genetics 134: 369–375.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Provine, W.B. 1986. Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathie, K.A. and Barker, J.S.F. 1968. Effectiveness of regular cycles of intermittent artificial selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila melanogaster. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 21: 1187–1213.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rathie, K.A. and Nicholas, F.W. 1980. Artificial selection with differing population structures. Genetical Research 36: 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. 1953. A numerical description of breed structure. Journal of Agricultural Science 43: 334–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson A. 1960. A theory of limits to artificial selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 153: 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. 1966. A mathematical model of culling in dairy cattle. Animal Production 8: 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. and Asker, A.A. 1951. The genetic history and breed structure of British Friesian cattle. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 19: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. and Barker, J.S.F. 1966. Correlation between first lactation milk production and longevity in dairy cattle. Animal Production 8: 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, A.K., Frankham, R., Jones, L.P., Rathie, K.A. and Barker, J.S.F. 1968. Partitioning of variance and estimation of genetic parameters for various bristle number characters of Drosophila melanogaster. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 38: 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, A.K. and Barker, J.S.F. 1974a. 2-trait selection and genetic correlation. 1. Prediction of responses in single-trait and in 2-trait selection. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 27: 75–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, A.K. and Barker, J.S.F. 1974b. 2-trait selection and genetic correlation. 2. Changes in genetic correlation during 2-trait selection. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 27: 89–101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S.G., Barker, J.S.F., Selvaraj, O.S., Mukherjee, T.K. and Wong, Y.F. 1993. Genetic-studies of water-buffalo blood markers. 1. Red-cell acid-phosphatase, albumin, catalase, red-cell alpha-esterase-3, group-specific component, and protease inhibitor. Biochemical Genetics 31: 223–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A.C.C., Sunnucks, P., Bedo, D.G. and Barker, J.S.F. 2006. Microsatellites reveal male recombination and neo-sex chromosome formation in Scaptodrosophila hibisci (Drosophilidae). Genetical Research. 87: 33–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1922. The effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding in guinea pigs. III. Crosses between highly inbred families. USDA Bulletin 1121: 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1977. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 3, Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B.H. 1974. Correlated responses of different scute genotypes to long-term selection for increased abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 27: 205–218.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B.H. 1980a. Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Response to selection. Genetical Research 35: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B.H. 1980b. Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 2. Lethals and visible mutants with large effects. Genetical Research 35: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B.H. 1980c. Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 3. The nature of residual genetic variability. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 57: 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B.H. 1980d. Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large replicate populations of Drosophila melanagaster. 5. The inbreeding effect of selection. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 33: 713–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B.H., Nicholas, F.W. and Rathie, K.A. 1980. Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 4. Relaxed and reverse selection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 57: 113–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nicholas, F.W., Hammond, K. (2009). Stuart Barker’s Contributions to Population Genetics and Animal Breeding: Exploring Fitness, Evolution and Animal Genetics. In: van der Werf, J., Graser, HU., Frankham, R., Gondro, C. (eds) Adaptation and Fitness in Animal Populations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9005-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics