Advertisement

Towards A Sociology Of Academic Work

  • Christine Musselin
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 24)

Different factors push for the inscription of the sociology of academic work on the research agenda. A first one stems from the fact it is still a relatively under-covered perspective in the study of the academic profession and thus can renew the existing approaches. But, fundamentally, the need to develop such a perspective is first of all that it is increasingly relevant at a time when in many countries universities are becoming more autonomous, more managed, more assessed, more responsible and more accountable. This evolution, combined with the massification experienced by this sector, is leading to a form of industrialisation of academic activities and to the progressive transformation of the higher education sector into a kind of industry (Gumport 2000). The impact of this major change on academic work has to be studied.

This shift in the nature of the higher education sector is better noticeable in countries like the United Kingdom where reforms informed by the new public management narratives (Ferlie et al. 1996; Ferlie and Musselin 2008) and managerialist rhetoric were implemented. In the comparative work led in the late 1990s by Marianne, Ivar Bleiklie, Mary Henkel and Maurice Kogan on Norway, Sweden and United Kingdom (Bauer et al. 1999; Bleiklie et al. 2000; Kogan et al. 2000), this last country clearly appears as the one where national public policies on the one hand (Kogan and Hanney 2000) and the internal governance of the higher education institutions on the other, have been the more radically and deeply transformed. Within this collective project, it is the originality of Mary Henkel's research and book (Henkel 2000) to aim at looking at the impact of this evolution on British academics from an innovative perspective. Building on the notion of community, she decided to shed light on the interplay between institutional and professional constraints. Thus, stating that academics are simultaneously affiliated to an institution and to a discipline, Mary Henkel decided to question the impact of the institutional changes on academics by looking at their identities and beliefs but also at their activities and practices.

Keywords

High Education Institution High Education System Academic Work Academic Activity High Education Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

s

  1. Bauer, M., S. Marton, B. Askling and F. Marton. Transforming Universities: Changing Patterns of Governance, Structure and Learning in Swedish Higher Education. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. Becher, T. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. Becquet, V. and C. Musselin. “Variations autour du travail des universitaires.” Convention MENRT 20022007, ACI: “Travail”, CSO Monograph, Paris, 2004.Google Scholar
  4. Bleiklie, I., R. Høstaker and A. Vabø. Policy and Practice in Higher Education. Reforming Norwegian Universities. London: Jessica Kingsley, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Bloor, D. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Brunsson, N. and K. Sahlin-Andersonn. “Constructing Organisations: The Example of Public Reform Sector.” Organisation Studies 4 (2000): 323–335.Google Scholar
  7. Bucher, R. and A. Strauss. “Professions in Process.” American Journal of Sociology 66.4 (1961): 352–334.Google Scholar
  8. Callon, M. (ed.). La science et ses réseaux. Genèse et circulation des faits scientifiques. Paris: La découverte, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. Camerati, F. ”Integrating specialized knowledge: the growing role of university departments”, 23rd EGOS Colloquium, Beyond Waltz — Dances of Individuals and Organization, Vienna, Austria, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Castel, P. and I. Merle. “Quand les normes de pratiques deviennent une ressource pour les médecins.” Sociologie du Travail 44..3 (2002): 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deem, R. “Globalisation, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism and Entrepreneurialism in Universities: Is the Local Dimension Important”? Comparative Education 37.1 (2001): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dill, D. “Regulatory Success Regulatory Failure: A Review of the Regulation of Academic Quality in the United Kingdom”, CHER Annual Research Conference, Vienna, Austria, 2002.Google Scholar
  13. Doeringer, P. and M. Piore. Internal labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington: Heath Lexington Books, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. Enders, J., H. de Boer and L. Leisyte. “Public Sector Reform in Dutch Higher Education: The Organizational Transformation of the University.” Public Administration 85.1 (2007): 27–46.Google Scholar
  15. Enders, J. and C. Musselin. “Back to the Future? The Academic Professions in the 21st Century.” In OECD. Higher Education 2030, vol. 1: Demography, Paris: OECD Editions (L'enseignement supérieur en 2030, vol. 1: Démographie, Paris: Editions OCDE), 2008 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  16. Ferlie, E., L. Ashburner, L. Fitzgerald and A. Pettigrew. The New Public Management in Action. London: Sage, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. Ferlie, E. and C. Musselin (with the collaboration of G. Andresani). “The ‘Steering’ of Higher Education Systems A Public Management Perspective.” Higher Education, 2008 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  18. Fulton, O. “Higher Education Governance in the UK: Change and Continuity.” In Amaral, A., G. Jones and B. Karseth (eds). Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002, 187–211.Google Scholar
  19. Fulton, O. “Managerialism in UK Universities: Unstable hybridity and the complications of implementation.” In Amaral, A., V.L. Meek and I.M. Larsen (eds). The Higher Education Managerial Revolution? Dordrecht: KLUWER Academic Press, 2003, 155–178.Google Scholar
  20. Gumport, P.J. “Academic Restructuring: Organizational Change and Institutional Imperatives.” Higher Education 39 (2000): 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harley, S. “The Impact of Research Assessment Exercise on academic Work and Identity in UK Universities.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (2002): 187–205.Google Scholar
  22. Harley, S., M. Muller-Camen and A. Collin. “From Academic Communities to Managed Organisations: The Implications for Academic Careers in UK and German Universities.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 64 (2004): 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henkel, M. “The Modernisation of Research Evaluation: The Case of the UK.” Higher Education 38 (1999): 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henkel, M. Academic Identities and Policy, Change in Higher Education. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 2000.Google Scholar
  25. Henkel, M. and B. Little. Changing Relationships Between Higher Education and the State. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 1999.Google Scholar
  26. Henkel, M. “Academic Identity and Autonomy in a Changing Environment.” Higher Education, 49.1–2 (2005): 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knorr-Cetina, K.D. Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  28. Kogan, M., M. Bauer, I. Bleiklie and M. Henkel. Transforming Higher Education: A comparative study. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 2000.Google Scholar
  29. Kogan, M. and S. Hanney. Reforming Higher Education. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley, 2000.Google Scholar
  30. Kornblith, H. (ed.). Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  31. Krücken, G. and F. Meier. “Turning the University into an Organizational Actor.” In Drori, G., J. Meyer and H. Hwang (eds). Globalization and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 241–257.Google Scholar
  32. Lallement, M. Le Travail. Une sociologie contemporaine. Paris: Folio, Gallimard, 2007.Google Scholar
  33. Latour, B. Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  34. Latour, B. and S. Woolgar. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
  35. Menger, P.-M. Portrait de l'artiste en travailleur. Métamorphoses du capitalisme. Paris: Seuil, 2002.Google Scholar
  36. Merton, R.K. “Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science.” American Sociological Review 22 (1957a): 635–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merton, R.K. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1957b.Google Scholar
  38. Morris, N. and A. Rip. “Scientists Coping Strategies in an Evolving Research System: The Case of Life Scientists in the UK.” Science and Public Policy 33.4 (2006): 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morris, N. “The Developing Role of Departments.” Research Policy 31.5 (2002): 817–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Musselin, C. Le marché des universitaires. France, Allemagne, Etats-Unis. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2005a.Google Scholar
  41. Musselin, C. “European Academic Labor Markets in Transition.” Higher Education 49 (2005b): 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Musselin, C. “Are Universities Specific Organisations?” In Krücken G., A. Kosmützky and M. Torka (eds). Towards a Multiversity? Universities Between Global Trends and National Traditions. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2006, 63–84.Google Scholar
  43. Musselin, C. Les universitaires. Paris: La Découverte, 2008.Google Scholar
  44. Musselin, C. “The Academic Workplace: What We Already Know, What We Still Do not Know, and What We Would Like to Know”, US Social Science Research Council Publications. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  45. Musselin, C. and V. Becquet. “Academic Work and Academic Identities: A Comparison Between Four Disciplines.” In Välimaa J. and O.-H. Ylijoki (eds). Cultural Perspectives on Higher Education. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Paradeise, C. “Autonomie et régulation : retour sur deux notions clefs.” In Le Bianic, Th. and A. Vion (eds). Action publique et légitimité professionnelle. Paris: LGDJ, 2007, 194–200.Google Scholar
  47. Ritzer, G. and D. Walczak. “Rationalization and the Deprofessionalization of Physicians.” Social Forces 67.1 (1988): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reed, M. “New Managerialism, Professional Power and Organisational Governance in UK Universities: A Review and Assessment.” In Amaral, A., G. Jones and B. Karseth (eds). Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002, 163–186.Google Scholar
  49. Reed, M. and R. Deem. “New Managerialism — The Manager-academic and Technologies of Management in Universities — Looking Forward to Virtuality.” In Robins, K. and F. Webster (eds). The Virtual University. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, 126–147.Google Scholar
  50. Setbon, M. “La qualité des soins, nouveau paradigme de l'action collective.” Sociologie du travail 42.1 (2000): 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shinn, T. and P. Ragouet. Controverses sur la science. Pour une sociologie transversaliste de l'activité scientifique. Paris: Raisons d'agir, 2005.Google Scholar
  52. Slaugther, S. and L. Leslie. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  53. Slaugther, S. and G. Rhoades. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  54. Tapper, T. and B. Salter. “Interpreting the Process of Change in Higher Education: The Case of the Research Assessment Exercises.” Higher Education Quarterly 57.1 (2003): 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vigour, C. Sociologie politique comparée des réformes de la justice. Cas de la Belgique, de la France et de l'Italie. Ph.D. dissertation at the ENS de Cachan, 2005.Google Scholar
  56. Whitley, R. “Constructing Universities as Strategic Actors in Europe, Japan and Elsewhere.” Academia Europaea — Wenner-Green Foundations International Symposium on The University in the Market, November 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Musselin

    There are no affiliations available

    Personalised recommendations