Future Perspectives of the Welfare of Pigs

  • Jr. Don C. Lay
  • Jeremy N. Marchant-Forde
Part of the Animal Welfare book series (AWNS, volume 7)


Animal Welfare Social Ethic Retail Sector Assurance Scheme Quality Assurance Scheme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bayvel, A.C.D. (2004) Science-based animal welfare standards: the international role of the Office International des Epizooites. Animal Welfare 13, S163–S169.Google Scholar
  2. Bellaver, C. and Bellaver, I.H. (1999) Livestock production and quality of societies’ life in transition economies. Livestock Production Science 59, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blandford, D. and Fulponi, L. (1999) Emerging public concerns in agriculture: domestic policies and international trade commitments. European Review of Agricultural Economics 26, 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brambell, F.W.R. (1965) Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals kept under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. EC. (2007) European Commission – Directorate-General for Agriculture, Prospects for Agricultural Markets and Income, 2005–2014 for E.U.-27. Accessed 4th June, 2008.
  6. FAS (Foreign Agricultural Service). (2008) Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade, Accessed 4th June, 2008.
  7. Harrison, R. (1964) Animal Machines. The New Factory Farming Industry. Vincent Stuart Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  8. HFAC (Humane Farm Animal Care). (2003) Animal Care Standards. Available at
  9. Marchant, J.N. and Broom, D.M. (1996) Effects of dry sow housing conditions on muscle weight and bone strength. Animal Science 62, 105–113.Google Scholar
  10. Marchant, J.N., Mendl, M.T., Rudd, A.R. and Broom, D.M. (1995) The effect of agonistic interactions on heart rate of group-housed sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mench, J.A. (2003) Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: a United States perspective. Animal Welfare 12, 493–503.Google Scholar
  12. Moore, S. and Simon, J.L. (1999) The greatest century that ever was: 25 miraculous trends of the past 100 years. Policy Analysis, No 364. Cato Institute, Washington DC, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  13. UEP (United Egg Producers). (2002) Animal Husbandry Guidelines for U.S. Egg Laying Flocks. United Egg Producers, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  14. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). (2003) National Organic Program. 7CRF Part 205. USDA, Washington DC, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  15. Wolfson, D.J. (1996) Beyond the Law. Archimedian Press, New York, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  16. Wood, J.D., Holder, J.S. and Main, D.C.J. (1998) Quality assurance schemes. Meat Science 49, S191–S203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jr. Don C. Lay
    • 1
  • Jeremy N. Marchant-Forde
  1. 1.USDA-ARS, Livestock Behavior Research Unit, Poultry Science BuildingPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations