Research Misconduct – Irresistible Temptation
Temptation is ever-present in the clinical testing environment, and a conflict of interest can turn that temptation into an unacceptable moral act. Impropriety may also take the form of outright fraud as a researcher tries to profit from the lucrative medical research field. When it comes to safeguarding subjects in a clinical trial, the most important body that can insist on ethical behavior are Institutional Review Boards, which review and monitor research studies involving human subjects. There has always been concern over the relationship between clinical investigators and pharmaceutical companies. With all the complex financial relationships between drug companies and researchers, concerns about imprudent behavior cannot be overlooked. A series of case studies show how personal greed can disgrace the proud research profession. The brilliant academic who authored numerous articles in very good journals until it was discovered they were based on fabricated and falsified data. The successful entrepreneur in California who was caught conducting fraudulent research, exposed by his own employees. The phony physician overseeing clinical trials charged and convicted of fraud and criminal negligent homicide, ending up with a six-year jail sentence.
KeywordsConfl ict of interest ethics fraud misconduct whistleblower
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Chapter 23 — Research Misconduct
- Joyce C. Congress slams misconduct in medical research. New Scientist. http://www. newscientist.com/article/mg12717340.300-congress-slams-misconduct-in-medical-research-.html 15 Sep 30, 1990.
- Quick J. Maintaining the integrity of the clinical evidence base. B World Health Organ 2001:79;1093.Google Scholar
- Willman D. Stealth merger: drug companies and government medical research. Los Angeles Times Dec 7, 2003:A1.Google Scholar
- Eichenwald K. U.S. officials are examining clinical trials. New York Times July 14, 1999:C1.Google Scholar
- Eichenwald K, Kolata G. Research for hire. A doctor's drug studies turn into fraud. New York Times May 17, 1999:A1.Google Scholar
- Emanual E, Wood A, Fleishman A, et al. Oversight of human participants research: identifying problems to evaluate reform proposals. Ann Intern Med 2004:141;282–291.Google Scholar
- Health and Human Services. Hearing: avoiding conflicts of interest at the National Institutes of Health. Statement by Ruth Kirchstein, M.D.http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t040122a.html Jan 22, 2004.
- Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations. Part 46 Protection of human subjects. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.107 June 23, 2005.
- Judson H. The great betrayal: fraud in science. New York: Harcourt, 2004.Google Scholar
- National Institutes of Health. Conflict of interest information and resources. http://www.nih.gov/about/ethics/evaluationslides.pdf Oct 26, 2006.
- National Institutes of Health. NIH history. http://www.nih.gov/about/history.htm Aug 1, 2006.
- Schneider W. The establishment of institutional review boards in the U.S. http://www.iupui. edu/~histwhs/G504.dir/irbhist.html Jan 3, 2006.
- Sontag D. Abuses endangered veterans in cancer drug experiments. New York Times Feb 6, 2005:A1.Google Scholar
- Weiss R. U.S. researchers reach deal in '99 gene therapy case. Washington Post Feb 10, 2005:A3.Google Scholar