Advertisement

Error: The Long Neglect, the One-Sided View, and a Typology

  • Giora Hon
Part of the Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science book series (BSPS, volume 267)

Keywords

Error Probability Experimental Knowledge Error Elimination Loeb Classical Library Underdetermination Argument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Affentranger, B. (2000) The Spectacle of the Growth of Knowledge and Swift’s Satires on Science (New York : Allworth Press).Google Scholar
  2. Almeder, R. (1999) “Recent Work on Error,” Philosophia 27: 3–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, D. W. (1996) “The Epistemology of Error in Late Enlightenment France,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 29: 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, D. W. (2002) Enlightenment Aberrations: Error and Revolution in France (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  5. Biagioli, M. (1987) “Meyerson and Koyré: Toward a Dialectic of Scientific Change,” History and Technology 4: 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchwald, J. Z. (ed.) (1995) Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics (Chicago: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
  7. Chalmers, A. F. (1973) “On Learning from our Mistakes,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24: 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chalmers, A. F. (1978/2000) What Is This Thing Called Science, 3rd ed. (Buckingham: Open University Press).Google Scholar
  9. Crocker, L. G. (1953) “The Problem of Truth and Falsehood in the Age of Enlightenment,” Journal of the History of Ideas 14: 575–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, G. R. (1998) Getting it Wrong: the Medieval Epistemology of Error (Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill).Google Scholar
  11. Fowler, H. N. (tr.) (1977) Plato’s Theaetetus, the Loeb Classical Library, Plato VII, vol. 128 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Franklin, A. (1981) “Millikan’s published and unpublished data on oil drops,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 11: 185–201.Google Scholar
  13. Galison, P. (1987) How Experiments End (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  14. Giere, R. N. (1997) “Scientific Inference: Two Points of View,” Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 64: S180–S184.Google Scholar
  15. Hertz, H. (1883/1896) Miscellaneous Papers, with an introduction by P. Lenard. D. E. Jones and G. A. Schott (trs.) (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  16. Hon, G. (1989a) “Franck and Hertz versus Townsend: A Study of Two Types of Experimental Error,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Science 20: 79–106.Google Scholar
  17. Hon, G. (1989b) “Towards a Typology of Experimental Errors: an Epistemological View,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20: 469–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hon, G. (1989c) “Is There a Concept of Experimental Error in Greek Astronomy?” The British Journal for the History of Science 22: 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hon, G. (1995) “Is the Identification of Experimental Error Contextually Dependent? The Case of Kaufmann’s Experiment and Its Varied Reception,” in Buchwald 1995, 170–223.Google Scholar
  20. Hon, G. (1998a) “‘If This Be Error’: Probing Experiment With Error,” in M. Heidelberger and F. Steinle, (eds.), Experimental Essays—Versuche zum Experiment (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 227–248.Google Scholar
  21. Hon, G. (1998b) “Exploiting Errors,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hon, G. (2003) “The Idols of Experiment: Transcending the ‘Etc. List’,” in Radder 2003, 174–197.Google Scholar
  23. Honner, J. (1987) The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  24. Howson, C. (1997) “Error Probabilities in Error,” Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 64: S185–S194.Google Scholar
  25. Jardine, N. (2000a) “Uses and Abuses of Anachronism in the History of the Sciences,” History of Science 38: 251–270.Google Scholar
  26. Jardine, N. (2000b) “Koyré’s Kepler/Kepler’s Koyré,” History of Science 38: 363–376.Google Scholar
  27. Kant, I. (1800/1992) Lectures on Logic, J. M. Young (tran. and ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Kenaan, H. (1999) “Subject to Error: Rethinking Husserl’s Phenomenology of Misperception,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7: 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koyré, A. (1945) Discovering Plato (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  30. Koyré, A. (1966) Études D’Histoire de la Pensée Scientifique (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  31. Koyré, A. (1966/1978) Galileo Studies (New Jersey: Humanities Press).Google Scholar
  32. Krüger, L., L. J. Daston, and M. Heidelberger (eds.) (1989) The Probabilistic Revolution: Ideas in History, 2nd printing (Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
  33. Mach, E. (1905/1976) Knowledge and Error (Dordrecht: Reidel).Google Scholar
  34. Maxwell, J. C. (1871) “Introductory Lecture on Experimental Physics,” in J. C. Maxwell (1890) Scientific Papers, W. D. Niven (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), ii, 241–255.Google Scholar
  35. Mayo, D. G. (1996) Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge (Chicago and London: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
  36. Mayo, D. G. (1997) “Error Statistics and Learning From Error: Making a Virtue of Necessity,” Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 64: S195–S212.Google Scholar
  37. Mellor, D. H. (1965) “Experimental Error and Deducibility,” Philosophy of Science 32: 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mellor, D. H. (1967) “Imprecision and Explanation,” Philosophy of Science 34: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mirowski, P. (1994) “A Visible Hand in the Marketplace of Ideas: Precision Measurement as Arbitrage,” Science in Context 7: 563–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mirowski, P. (1995) “Civilization and Its Discounts,” Dialogue 34: 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nye, M. J. (1980) “N-rays: an episode in history and psychology of science,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 11: 125–156.Google Scholar
  42. Peirce, C. S. (1966) Selected Writings, edited with an introduction and notes by P. P. Wiener (New York: Dover).Google Scholar
  43. Plato, Theaetetus; see Fowler (tr.) 1977.Google Scholar
  44. Pool, R. (1997) Beyond Engineering: How Society Shapes Technology (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  45. Popper, K. (1959/1980) The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  46. Popper, K. (1963/1974) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. 5th ed. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  47. Popper, K. (1997) The Myth of the Framework (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  48. Popper, K. (1999) All Life is Problem Solving (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  49. Quine, W. V. (1995) From Stimulus to Science (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  50. Radder, H. (1995) “Experimenting in the Natural Sciences: A Philosophical Approach,” in Buchwald 1995, 56–86.Google Scholar
  51. Radder, H. (ed.) (2003) The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
  52. Schiller, F. C. S. (1908) Plato or Protagoras? Being a Critical Examination of the Protagoras Speech in the Theaetetus with Some Remarks upon Error (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  53. Schlich, T. (1993), “Making Mistakes in Science: Eduard Pflüger, His Scientific and Professional Concept of Physiology, and His Unsuccessful Theory of Diabetes (1903–1910),” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24: 411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sellars, W. (1961) “The Language of Theories,” in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.) Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston).Google Scholar
  55. Shapin, S. (1994) A Social History of Truth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  56. Sherry, D. (1997) “On Mathematical Error,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 28: 393–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sheynin, O. B. (1983) “Corrections and Short Notes on My Papers,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 28: 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stigler, S. M. (1986) The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900 (Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  59. Swijtink, Z. G. (2000) “Error Theory,” in A. Hessenbruch (ed.), Reader’s Guide to the History of Science (London and Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers), pp. 225–227.Google Scholar
  60. Wittgenstein, L. (1979) “Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough,” in C. G. Luckhardt (ed.), Wittgenstein Sources and Perspective (Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press), pp. 61–81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giora Hon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of HaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations