Abstract

Abstract One of the important themes in any discussion concerning the application of haploids in agricultural biotechnology or elsewhere is the role of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). This term covers both the content of patents and the confidential expertise, usually related to methodology and referred to as “Trade Secrets”. This review will explain the concepts behind patent protection, and will use the international patent databases to analyse the content of these patents and trends over the last 20 years. This analysis from regions including North America, Europe, and Asia reveals a total of more than 30 granted patents and a larger number of applications. The first of these patents dates from 1986, and although the peak of activity was in the late 1990s, there has been continuous interest to the present day. The subject matter of these patents and applications covers methods for anther and pollen culture, ovule culture, the use of specific haploid-inducing genes, the use of haploids as transformation targets, and the exploitation of genes that regulate embryo development. The species mentioned include cereals, vegetables, flowers, spices and trees.

Keywords Intellectual property Plant breeding genetics homozygous pollen anther ovule 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adcock M (2007) Intellectual property, genetically modified crops and bioethics. Biotechnol J 2:1088–1092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allyn RS (1933) Plant patent queries. A patent attorney's views on the law. J Hered 24:55–58Google Scholar
  3. Anon (1900) In: W. Wilks (ed), Hybrid Conference Report 1900. J Roy Hort Soc 24:47Google Scholar
  4. Anon (1906) The relations between science and industry. Nature 74:386–387Google Scholar
  5. Anon (1907) “Copyright” for raisers of novelties. In: W. Wilks (ed), Report of the third international conference 1906 on Genetics; hybridisation (the cross-breeding of genera or species), the cross-breeding of varieties and general plant breeding. Royal Horticultural Society, London. pp 474–475Google Scholar
  6. Barrons KC (1936) A defense of basic plant patents. From the plant breeder's point of view. J Heredity 27:475–478Google Scholar
  7. Binenbaum E, Nottenburg C, Pardey PG, Wright BD, Zambrano P (2003) South-north trade, intellectual property jurisdictions, and freedom to operate in agricultural research on staple crops. Econ Develop Cult Change 51:309–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brennan M, Pray C, Naseem A, Oehmke JF (2005) An innovation market approach to analyzing impacts of mergers and acquisitions in the plant biotechnology industry. AgBioForum 8:89–99Google Scholar
  9. Brown WM (2003) Intellectual property law: a primer for scientists. Mol Biotechnol 23: 213–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cahoon RS (2000) Property rights and agricultural biotechnology. In: Hrazdina G (ed) Use of agriculturally important genes in biotechnology. IOS Press, Amsterdam. pp 203–215Google Scholar
  11. Cantley M (2004) How should public policy respond to the challenges of modern biotechnology? Curr Opin Biotechnol 15:258–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan HP (2006) International patent behavior of nine major agricultural biotechnology firms. AgBioForum 9:59–68Google Scholar
  13. Cook RC (1931a) The first plant patent. J Hered 22:313–319Google Scholar
  14. Cook RC (1931b) Three more plant patents. J Hered 22:369–372Google Scholar
  15. Cook RC (1933) Other plant patents. J Hered 24:49–54Google Scholar
  16. Cook RC (1936) Plant patent 110 declared invalid. J Hered 27:394–400Google Scholar
  17. Donnenwirth J, Grace J, Smith S (2004) Intellectual property rights, patents, plant variety protection and contracts: a perspective from the private sector. IP Strategy Today 9:19–34Google Scholar
  18. Dunwell JM (2007) 100 years on: a century of genetics. Nat Rev Genet 8:231–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eaton D (2007) Intellectual property rights in plant breeding and biotechnology: a comparative institutional analysis. Presented at: 11th Ann Conf Int Soc New Instit Econ (ISNIE), ReykjavikGoogle Scholar
  20. Eisenberg RS (2006) Biotech patents: looking backward while moving forward. Nat Biotech 24:317–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farnley S, Morey-Nase P, Sternfeld D (2004) Biotechnology — a challenge to the patent system. Curr Opin Biotechnol 15:254–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fay AE (1937) Are plant patents “inventions”? J Hered 28:261–262Google Scholar
  23. Fleck B, Baldock C (2003) Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe. Nat Rev Genet 4:834–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Forster BP, Thomas WTB (2005). Doubled haploids in genetics and plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev 25:57–88Google Scholar
  25. Forster BP, Heberle-Bors E, Kasha KJ, Touraev A (2007) The resurgence of haploids in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci 12:368–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaisford JD, Hobbs JE, Kerr WA (2007) Will the TRIPS agreement foster appropriate biotechnologies for developing countries? J Agr Econ 58:199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garrison C (2006) Exceptions to patent rights in developing countries. International centre for trade and sustainable development (ICTSD). Issue Paper No. 17Google Scholar
  28. Giannakas K (2001) The economics of intellectual property rights under imperfect enforcement: developing countries, biotechnology, and the Trips Agreement. EPTD Discussion paper No. 80. Int Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Graff GD, Cullen SE, Bradford KJ, Zilberman D, Bennett AB (2003) The public-private structure of intellectual property ownership in agricultural biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol 21:989–995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hails R (2004) Bioethics for technology? Curr Opin Biotechnol 15:250–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heisey PW, King JL, Rubenstein KD (2005) Patterns of public-sector and private-sector patenting in agricultural biotechnology. AgBioForum 8:73–82Google Scholar
  32. Helfer LR (2004) Intellectual property rights in plant varieties. International legal regimes and policy options for national governments. FAO Legislative Study 85Google Scholar
  33. Huskisson FM (1996) Patents and biotechnology. In: Owen MRL, Pen J (eds) Transgenic plants: a production system for industrial and pharmaceutical proteins. Wiley, New York, pp 313–328Google Scholar
  34. Kingston W (2007) Repairing incentives to invest in plant breeding. Int Prop Quart 10:294–311Google Scholar
  35. Kock MA (2007) Essentially biological processes: the interpretation of the exception under Article 53(b) of the European Patent Convention. J Intell Prop Law Prac 2:286–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koo B, Nottenburg C, Pardey PG (2004) Intellectual property. Plants and intellectual property: an international appraisal. Science 306:1295–1297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kryder RD, Kowalski SP, Krattiger AF (2000) The intellectual and technical property components of pro-vitamin A rice (GoldenRice™): a preliminary freedom-to-operate review. ISAAA Brief No 20. International service for the acquisition of agri-biotech resources, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  38. Kukier KN (2006) Navigating the future(s) of biotech intellectual property. Nat Biotech 24:249–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Léger A (2007) The role(s) of intellectual property rights for innovation: a review of the empirical evidence and implications for developing countries. Discussion papers 707. DIW Berlin. German Inst Econ ResGoogle Scholar
  40. Lence SH, Hayes DJ, McCunn A, Smith S, Niebur B (2002) Welfare Impacts of Property Rights in the Seed Industry. http://www.econ.iastate.edu/department/seminar/ispw/Sergio-Dermot-seed-paper.pdf
  41. Llewelyn M, Adcock M (2006) European plant intellectual property. Hart Publishing, Oxford/ PortlandGoogle Scholar
  42. Locke SD (2007) Intellectual property for the botanist and the plant breeder: an overview of protection afforded by plant patents and plant variety protection certificates. Chicago-Kent J Intellect Prop 6:198–212Google Scholar
  43. Louwaars NP, Tripp R, Eaton D, Henson-Apollonio V, Hu R, Mendoza M, Muhhuku F, Pal S, Wekundah J (2005) Impacts of strengthened intellectual property rights regimes on the plant breeding industry in developing countries: a synthesis of five case studies. Wageningen URGoogle Scholar
  44. Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Forster BP, Szarejko I (eds) (2003) Doubled haploid production in crop plants: a manual. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  45. Merrill SA, Levin RC, Myers MB (2004) A patent system for the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Ministry of Economic Development (2002) New issues in patentability 1: Biotechnological patents. In: Review of the Patents Act 1953: boundaries to patentability. Wellington, New Zealand, pp 29–40Google Scholar
  47. Morris M, Edmeades G, Pehu E (2006) The global need for plant breeding capacity: what roles for the public and private sectors? Hortscience 41:30–39Google Scholar
  48. Palmer, CE, Keller, WA and Kasha, KJ (eds) (2005) Haploids in crop improvement II, Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry Vol. 56. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  49. Parayil G (2003) Mapping technological trajectories of the green revolution and the gene revolution from modernization to globalisation. Research Policy 32:971–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schimmelpfennig D, King J (2006) Mergers, acquisitions and flows of agbiotech intellectual property. In: Evenson RE, Santaniello V (eds) International trade and policies for genetically modified products. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 97–109Google Scholar
  51. Schrell A, Bauser H, Brunner H (2007) Biotechnology patenting policy in the European Union-as exemplified by the development in Germany. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 107:13–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Shear RH, Kelley TE (2003) A researcher's guide to patents. Plant Physiol 132:1127–1130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Straus J (2007) The impact of the new world order on economic development: the role of the intellectual property rights system. Europ Rev 15:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tokgoz S (2003) R&D spillovers in agriculture: results from a trade model. Center for Agric Rural Devel, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Working Paper 03-WP 344Google Scholar
  55. Wright BD (2006) Plant genetic engineering and intellectual property protection. Agr Biotech in California Series. Publication 8186Google Scholar
  56. Wright BD, Pardey PG (2006) The evolving rights to intellectual property protection in the agricultural biosciences. Int J Technol Globalis 2:12–29Google Scholar
  57. Yerokhin O, Moschini G (2007) Intellectual property rights and crop-improving R& D under adaptive destruction. Center for Agric Rural Devel, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Working Paper 07-WP 449Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences, University of ReadingWhiteknightsUK

Personalised recommendations