Skip to main content

Instructor Scaffolding in Support of Students’ Metacognition Through an Online Course

Why to Promote and How to Investigate

  • Conference paper
Beyond Knowledge: The Legacy of Competence

Abstract

The main goal of the current study was to investigate the relationship between an instructor’s scaffolding in an online course and students’ metacognitive reflections. 700 postings, written by 68 students, were content analyzed along with 66 postings by the instructor, using tools designed for that purpose. A positive correlation was found between the instructor’s responses and students’ metacognitive thinking, demonstrating the importance of an instructor’s feedback in helping to produce an environment in which students would experience learning through reflective and metacognitive processes. Our study highlights the unique potential of online courses coupled with instructor-led scaffolding to promote and study students’ metacognitive reflections. The uniqueness of the current study can be found in applying qualitative and quantitative methodologies to achieve an integrated examination of the instructor’s scaffolding and students’ thinking in an e-learning course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, M. D. (2001). Individual characteristics and web-based courses. In C. R. Wolfe (Ed.), Learning and teaching on the World Wide Web (pp. 47- 68). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M., & Collins, M. (2003). Online Writing as a Form of Electronic Communication in a Second Year Biology Course. Media and Technology for Human Resource Development: Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1-2), 33-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. A. (1996). The canon debate, knowledge construction and multicultural education. In Banks, J. A. (Ed.). Multicultural education, transformative knowledge & action. (pp. 3-29). New York: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernt, F. M., & Bugbee, A. C, jr. (1993). Study practices and attitudes related to academic success in a distance learning program. Distance Education, 14, 97-113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65, 245-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chute, A. G., & Shatzer, L. S. (1995). Designing for international teletraining, Adult Learning, 7(1), 20-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornbleth, C. (1986). Ritual and rationality in teacher education reform. Educational Researcher, April, 5 - 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danchak, M. M., & Huguet, M. P. (2004). Designing for the changing role of the instructor in blended learning. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 47(3), 200-210. Retrieved September 10, 2005, Retrieved from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/47/29409/013315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (April 2003). Characterizing and fostering productive reflection in prospective elementary science teachers. A paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Pereira, J. E. (2005), Teacher Education for Social Transformation and its Links to Progressive Social Movements: The case of the Landless Workers Movement in Brazil. The Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, Vol.3, No. 2. Retrieved April 23 2007, Retrieved from: http://www.jceps.com/index.php?pageID=home&issueID=6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P., & Newby, T. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated and reflective. Instructional Science 14, 1-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A, (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review 3-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34, 906-911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyong-Jee, K., & Bonk, C. J. (2002), Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Online Collaboration, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8 (1), Retrieved from: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue1/kimandbonk.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, R. (2006). The Role of Emotion in Creating Instructor and Learner Presence in the Distance Education Experience. Journal of Cognitive Affective Learning 2(2), 12-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrindle, A., & Christensen, C. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance. Learning and Instruction 5, 167-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. (1996). Context and Consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nashon, S. M., Anderson, D., & Nielsen, W. (2005). Students metacognitive traits as pointers to their subsequent knowledge construction. Conference Proceedings CD of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Dallas, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehama, T., Kalay, A., & Rimor, R (2005). Types and Levels of Teachers Supports in an Online Environment: Typology of scaffolding. A Paper Presented at the IACE 20$th$ Annual Meeting (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir-Gal, O., Nur, T., Gelbart, R., & Reingold, R. (2005). The Online Teacher’s Role - An Analysis Reflected by Field Data, Research Report, Achva- College of Education, supported by The MOFET Institute (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaleontiou-Louca, E. (2003). The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher Development 7(1), 9–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S.G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In: B. Jones and L. Idol. Hillsdale (Eds.). Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimor, R. (2002). From search for data to construction of knowledge. Processes of organization and construction of knowledge in data-base environment. Ph.D. Thesis. Ben-Gurion University. Beer- Sheva, Israel. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimor, R., & Kozminsky, E. (2001-2002). An analysis of the reflections of students in online courses. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Retrieved June 15, 2006, Retrieved from: http://burdacenter.bgu.ac.il/publications/finalReports2001-2002/Rimor.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, T. C., & Ford, D. J. (Spring, 2006). Teachers’ reflection on reflection practice. Journal of Cognitive Affective Learning, 2(2), 1–12. Retrieved August 31, 2006, Retrieved from: https://www.jcal.emory.edu//viewarticle.php?id=54&layout=html

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums. Journal of computer learning 18, 351-366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, P. (2001). Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes. In Cole, M. et al. (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R., & Massy, W. F. (2004).Thwarted Innovation - What Happened to e-learning and Why . A Learning Alliance Report. Retrieved August 20, 2004, Retrieved from: http://www.csudh.edu/dearhabermas/WeatherStation_Report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rimor, R., Reingold, R., Heiman, T. (2008). Instructor Scaffolding in Support of Students’ Metacognition Through an Online Course. In: Zumbach, J., Schwartz, N., Seufert, T., Kester, L. (eds) Beyond Knowledge: The Legacy of Competence. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8827-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics