Skip to main content

An Empirical Test of the Agglutination Hypothesis

  • Chapter

Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT,volume 76)

Abstract

In this paper, I approach the agglutination-fusion distinction from an empirical point of view. Although the well-known morphological typology of languages (isolating, agglutinating, flexive/fusional, incorporating) has often been criticized as empty, the old idea that there are (predominantly) agglutinating and (predominantly) fusional languages in fact makes two implicit predictions. First, agglutination/fusion is characteristic of whole languages rather than individual constructions; second, the various components of agglutination/fusion correlate with each other. The (unstated, but widely assumed) Agglutination Hypothesis can thus be formulated as follows:

(i) First prediction: If a language is agglutinating/fusional in one area of its morphology (e.g. in nouns, or in the future tense), it shows the same type elsewhere.

(ii) Second prediction: If a language is agglutinating/fusional with respect to one of the three agglutination parameters (a-c) (and perhaps others), it shows the same type with respect to the other two parameters: (a) separation/cumulation, (b) morpheme invariance/morpheme variability, (c) affix uniformity/affix suppletion.

I report on a study of the nominal and verbal inflectional morphology of a reasonably balanced world-wide sample of 30 languages, applying a variety of\break measures for the agglutination parameters and determining whether they are cross-linguistically significant. The results do not confirm the validity of the Agglutination Hypothesis, and the current evidence suggests that “agglutination” is just one way of trying to capture the strangeness of non-Indo-European languages, which all look alike to Eurocentric eyes.

Keywords

  • Typology
  • typological morphology
  • inflection
  • agglutination
  • fusion

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8825-4_2
  • Chapter length: 17 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4020-8825-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Stephen R. 1985. Typological distinctions in word formation. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III, ed. Timothy Shopen, 3–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 1988. Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazell, Charles. 1958. Linguistic typology. In Five inaugural lectures, ed. Peter D. Strevens, 29–49. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, Balthasar and Johanna Nichols. 2005. Inflectional synthesis of the verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, ed. Haspelmath, Martin & Dryer, Matthew S. & Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard, 94–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1985. Typological aspects of Natural Morphology. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 35:51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2005. Morphological typology and first language acquisition: Some mutual challenges. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology: On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania, 21–23 September 2003, ed. Geert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi and Sergio Scalise, 7–20. (http:// mmm.lingue.unibo.it)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Genealogical language list. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, ed. Haspelmath, Martin & Dryer, Matthew S. & Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard, 584–644. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Nicholas. 1995. A grammar of Kayardild. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Joseph. 1954 [1960]. A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language. In Method and Perspective in Anthropology: Papers in Honor of Wilson D. Wallis, ed. Robert F. Spencer, 192–220. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [Reprinted in: International Journal of American Linguistics 26 (1960): 178–94.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Joseph. 1974. Language typology: A historical and analytic overview. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmslev, Louis. 1963. Sproget: En introduktion. København: Berlingske Forlag. (German translation: Die Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1822/1985. Ueber das Entstehen der grammatischen Formen, und ihren Einfluss auf die Ideenentwicklung, reprinted in: über die Sprache: Ausgewählte Schriften, ed. Jürgen Trabant, München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1836. über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluβ auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechtes. Reprinted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, Larry. 2001. Tonal systems. In Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (HSK), vol. II, ed. Martin Haspelmath et al. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1367–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupa, Viktor. 1965. On quantification in typology. Linguistics 12: 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Friedrich Max. 1871. Lectures on the science of language. 2nd. Ed. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, Frans. 1986. Paradigm size, morphological typology and universal economy. Folia Linguistica 20: 29–48.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Plank, Frans. 1991. Of abundance and scantiness in inflection: a typological prelude. In Paradigms: the economy of inflection, ed. Frans Plank, 1–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, Frans. 1998. The co-variation of phonology with morphology and syntax. Linguistic Typology 2.2:195–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank, Frans. 1999. Split morphology: How agglutination and flexion mix. Linguistic Typology 3.3: 279–340.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. Agglutination vs. flection. In Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (HSK), vol. I, ed. Martin Haspelmath et al., 669–678. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöchtrager, Markus A. & Bodó, Csanád & Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Schweiger, Teresa. 1998. One some inflectional properties of the agglutinating type illustrated from Finnish, Hungarian and Turkish inflection. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 62-63: 57–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, August Wilhelm von. 1818. Observations sur la langue et la littérature provençales. Paris: Librairie Grecque-latine-allemande.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, Friedrich von. 1808. Ueber die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier: Ein Beitrag zur Begründung der Alterthumskunde. Heidelberg: Mohr & Zimmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, August. 1850. Die Sprachen Europas in systematischer übersicht. Bonn: H. B. König.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silnitsky, George. 1993. Typological indices and language classes: a quantitative study. Glottometrika 14: 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalička, Vladimír. 1951. Das Erscheinungsbild der Sprachtypen. In Skalička, Vladimír. 1979. Typologische Studien. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, Dan. 1997. The origins of grammaticizable notions. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, vol. 5: Expanding the Contexts, ed. Dan Slobin, 265–323. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testelets, Yakov G. 2001. Russian works on linguistic typology in the 1960s–1990s. In Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, vol. I, ed. Martin Haspelmath et al., 306–323. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, Timothy J. 1987. An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, Lindsay J. 1997. Introduction to typology. Thousand Oaks/CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haspelmath, M. (2009). An Empirical Test of the Agglutination Hypothesis. In: Scalise, S., Magni, E., Bisetto, A. (eds) Universals of Language Today. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 76. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8825-4_2

Download citation