Collective Creativity: A Learning Community of Self-Study Scholars
Shaffer and Anundsen (1993) defined community as “a dynamic whole that emerges when a group of people participate in common practices, depend on each other, make decisions together, identify themselves as something larger than the sum of their individual relationships, and commit themselves for the long-term commitment to their own, one another's, and the group's well-being” (p. 10). In the past, involvement in community was determined by where you lived, your family, or religious connections. However, today our communities are formed through emerging choices with respect to identity and values; they are not necessarily place-based. This has been referred to as a conscious community in which each member's need for personal growth is emphasized; a community which honors the views of all its members (Shaffer & Anundsen, 1993). The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University (1998) recommended extending com munity to undergraduate classrooms, with colleges building and cultivating con scious communities for learning and growth (Boyer, 1987, 1990). The Commission called for undergraduate college communities that are purposeful, open, just, disci plined, caring, and celebratory. Our goal in this chapter is to explore what a con scious community can look like in a university graduate classroom.
In this story, we describe our experiences in a new course offered on self-study research in spring 2006. The course was designed and taught by Anastasia, a selfstudy teacher educator, with five Ph.D. candidates: Mary, Deanna, Kavita, Jennifer, and Dawn Renee. It took place at the College of Education and Human Development (CEHD) at George Mason University, a large Mid-Atlantic university committed to both research and the scholarship of teaching. The CEHD holds the following core values listed in alphabetical order: (a) collaboration; (b) ethical leadership; (c) innovation; (d) research-based practice; and (e) social justice. Some of the questions we asked in our self-study were: “In what ways does our work together align with the values of our college?” “How would we describe our learning community?” How did our learning community impact our learning, and what are the implications of our graduate learning community for other classrooms, programs,and universities? In this chapter, we individually and collectively analyze the impact of our learning community.
KeywordsSorting Editing Sonal
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
- Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Dinkleman, T. (2003). Self-study in teacher education: A means and ends tool for promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 16–18.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G.&Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, M. L., with Pinnegar, S., Russell, T., Loughran, J., & LaBoskey, V. (Eds.), (1998). Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- John-Steiner, V. (2006). Creative collaboration. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kravtsova, E. (2006). The tasks and prospects of cultural-historical psychology. Keynote lecture at the 7th International L. S. Vygotsky Memorial Conference “Cultural-Historical Theory: Prospects of Development” Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, November.Google Scholar
- LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 817–869). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loughran, J. J.&Northfield, J. (1998). A framework for the development of self-study practice. In M. L. Hamilton, with S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, J. Loughran, & V. K. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 7–18). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Loughran, J. J.&Russell, T. (2002). Improving teacher education practices through self-study. London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Russell, T.&Korthagen, F. (1995). Teachers who teach teachers: Reflections on teacher education. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Samaras, A. P. (2002). Self-study for teacher educators: Crafting a pedagogy for educational change. NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Samaras, A. P.&Freese, A. R. (2006). Self-study of teaching practices primer. NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Schramm, W. (1971). Notes on case studies of instructional media projects. Working paper for the Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Shaffer, C. R.&Anundsen, K. (1993). Creating community anywhere: Finding support and con nection in a fragmented world. NY: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.Google Scholar
- Smith, H. A. (1998). Self-study and the development of collective knowledge. In M. L. Hamilton, with S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, J. Loughran, & V. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 19–29). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The con cept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe. [Original work published 1960].Google Scholar
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5). Retrieved July 20, 2006, from http://www.ewenger.com/pub/pub_systems_thinker_wrd.doc.
- Wilcox, S., Watson, J., & Paterson, M. (2004). Self-study in professional practice. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (Vol. 1, pp. 273–312). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (3rd ed.) (2002). Case study research, design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar