Understanding the Distinguishing Features of a Microbial Fuel Cell as a Biomass-Based Renewable Energy Technology
Biomass-based renewable energy, which utilizes biomass derived from photosynthesis, could sustainably provide 67–450 EJ of energy annually. Biomass in organic wastes, for example, can annually provide 7.5 EJ of energy, and utilization of organic wastes locally as an energy source can prevent environmental pollution and reduce the energy losses associated with transportation. The technological challenge is to sustainably capture this biomass energy without creating serious environmental or social damage.
A microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a novel biomass-based technology that marries microbiological catalysis to electrochemistry. In an MFC, bacteria present at the fuel-cell anode catalyze the oxidation of diverse organic fuel sources, including domestic wastewater, animal manures, and plant residues. As an electrochemical process, an MFC converts the energy value stored in the organic fuel directly to electrical energy, avoiding combustion and combustion-associated contaminants. The main product at the anode is CO2 that is carbon neutral. When oxygen is the oxidant at the fuel-cell cathode, an MFC produces only H2O. An MFC is an attractive renewable energy technology, because it produces electricity at the same time it treats wastes, and it does so without producing harmful byproducts.
We introduce MFCs in the context of the general cycle for biomass-based renewable energy technology. Tracking of carbon oxidation state highlights the distinctly different approach that an MFC takes with respect to biofuels. Then, we review some of recent progress in MFC research, with an emphasis on mathematical modeling. At last, we conclude with our perspectives on biomass-based renewable energy by comparing the MFC with two more mature technologies for generating biofuels: bioethanol and anaerobic digestion to methane.
KeywordsAnode bioenergy biofilm biomass microbial fuel cell
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Goldemberg, J. and T.B. Johansson (2004). World energy assessment overview: 2004 update. United Nations Development Programme, New York.Google Scholar
- 2.Hall, D.O. and F. Rosillo-Calle (1998). In Survey of Energy Resources, 18th Edn. World Energy Council, London, 227–241.Google Scholar
- 4.Energy Information Administration (2005). Annual energy outlook: with projection to 2030. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 5.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2006). Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 15.Torres, C.I., A. Kato Marcus, and B.E. Rittmann (2007). Kinetics of consumption of fermentation products by anode-respiring bacteria. Appl Microb Biotechnol 77, 689–697.Google Scholar
- 20.Gorby, Y.A., S. Yanina, J.S. McLean, K.M. Rosso, D. Moyles, A. Dohnalkova, T.J. Beveridge, I.S. Chang, B.H. Kim, K.S. Kim, D.E. Culley, S.B. Reed, M.F. Romine, D.A. Saffarini, E.A. Hill, L. Shi, D.A. Elias, D.W. Kennedy, G. Pinchuk, K. Watanabe, S. Ishii, B. Logan, K.H. Nealson, and J.K. Fredrickson (2006). Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 and other microorganisms. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 11358–11363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lee, H.S., P. Parameswaran, A. Kato Marcus, C.I. Torres, and B.E. Rittmann (2007). Evaluation of energy-conversion efficiencies in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) utilizing fermentable and non-fermentable substrates. Water Research 42, 1501–1510.Google Scholar
- 23.McCarty, P.L. (1964). Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals: Part I – Chemistry and microbiology. Public Works 95, 91–94.Google Scholar
- 25.Torres, C.I., A. Kato Marcus, and B.E. Rittmann (2008). Proton transport inside the biofilm limits electrical current generation by anode-respiring bacteria. Biotechnol Bioengr 100, 872–881.Google Scholar
- 29.Bard, A.J. and L.R. Faulkner (2001). Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications. 2nd ed. John Wiley, New York, xxi, 833.Google Scholar
- 30.Larminie, J., A. Dicks, and Knovel (2003). (Firm), Fuel Cell Systems Explained. 2nd ed. John Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, xxii, 406.Google Scholar
- 32.Rittmann, B.E. and P.L. McCarty (2001). Environmental biotechnology: principles and applications. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Boston, 754 pp.Google Scholar
- 46.Pham, T.H., N. Boon, P. Aelterman, P. Clauwaert, L. De Schamphelaire, L. Vanhaecke, K. De Maeyer, M. Hofte, W. Verstraete, and K. Rabaey (2008). Metabolites produced by Pseudomonas sp enable a Gram-positive bacterium to achieve extracellular electron transfer. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77, 1119–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Shapouri, H., J.A. Duffield, and M. Wang (2001). The energy balance of corn ethanol: an update. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 55.Goolsby, D.A., W.A. Battaglin, G.B. Lawrence, R.S. Artz, B.T. Aulenbach, R.P. Hooper, D.R. Keeney, and G.J. Strensland (1999). Flux and sources of nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalya river basins. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 56.Graboski, M.S. (2002). Fossil energy use in the manufacture of corn ethanol. National Corn Growers Association, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA.Google Scholar
- 57.Committee on Water Implications of Biofuels Production in the United States (2007). Water Implications of Biofuels Production in the United States. National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar