Geological Knowledge of Greeks in the Era of Trojan War

  • Ilias D. MariolakosEmail author
Part of the History of Mechanism and Machine Science book series (HMMS, volume 6)

Among the many important historical, cultural and geographical elements found in the two Homeric epics, Iliad and Odyssey, there are many that allow the present-day geoscientist to draw indirect conclusions about the geological knowledge of the inhabitants of the Aegean and Circum-Aegean region.

By the end of 19th century, K. Zeggelis, published a monograph, entitled The Science of Naturein Homer (1891), where, among others, he mentioned and commented on the poet's references on minerals (metals and non-metals), their origin and the metallurgical knowledge of the people of that era. The opinion of Zeggelis that the metallurgical processes used, although known at the time of Homer, were not performed in Greece, but in other (probably Oriental) countries has been rejected by the newest archaeological and archaeometric studies, showing that metallurgy and smelting had begun in Greece long before the Trojan war, even before the Mycenaean times.

In this paper, we shall refer to the indirect conclusions to be drawn by the modern geoscientist, regarding the technical knowledge of the prehistoric Greeks, by studying drainage — anti-flooding works and dams constructed in Arcadia, during the Mycenaean times.

Arcadia was chosen because, as mentioned, the Arcadian king Agapeinor, son of Lycurgus, who lived in the town of Tegea, lead 6,000 Arcadians against Troy. The army was carried on 60 ships, offered by Agamemnon.

In the greater area of the Arcadian Plateau, a series of basins constitute a geologically “composite” polje. These basins are: the Takka basin, the Mantineia basin, the Argon Field (Nestani plain), the Levidion — Ancient Orchomenus basin and, finally, the Kandela basin. In three out of these five basins, the prehistoric people of Minyans had constructed a series of earth dams and other drainage works, as mentioned by Pausanias. These works were studied in great detail by J. Knauss, Professor of Hydraulic Engineering in Munich Polytechnic School.

These works aimed at:
  1. (i)

    protecting great parts of the basins against flood waters coming from the surrounding moun tains and the many karstic springs of the areas, thus increasing the land suitable for cultivation (land reclamation);

  2. (ii)

    securing irrigation water; and

  3. (iii)

    draining the many small swamps formed in the various plains, thus reducing the risk of malaria.

The detailed study of these works by Knauss, by a hydraulic engineer's point of view, show that Minyans were not only skilled engineers, but that they also had excellent capacity and knowledge on construction-site management, project management (very similar to the knowledge of modern-day engineers ), and that they were also capable of “diplomatic” interventions between cities, etc. The scientific and technological knowledge of the Minyans are comparable to those of modern scientists in matters related to the study of:
  • the meteorological and climatic conditions of an area,

  • the river-yields and their sediment load,

  • the topography,

  • the physical and mechanical characteristics of soils,

  • the geology of the flood basin and of the greater area, as well as the hydrogeological characteristics of the alpine and post-alpine geological formations,

  • the karstification and the hydraulic behavior of the karstic forms (caves, sinkholes, karstic springs, etc.),

  • and many more.


Karstic Spring Greek Mythology Geological Knowledge Reservoir Basin Geographical Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Curtius, E. (1892). Die Deichbauten der Minyer, Sitzungsbericht der Berliner Akademie der Wissensch., Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 55, 1181–1193.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kakridis, J. (1986). Greek Mythology, Ekdotiki Athinon, Vol. 4 [in Greek].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kenney, I. (1935). The ancient drainage of the Kopais, Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Liverpool 22, 189–206.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knauss, J. (1984). Die Wasserbauten der Minyer in der Kopais — die älteste Flussregulier-ung Europas (Kopais 1), Wasserbau und Wasserwirtschaft, No. 50, Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knauss, J., Heinrich, B. and Kalcyk, H. (1986). Der Damm bei Kaphyai und Orchomenos in Arkadien, Archeologischer Anzeiger, 538–611.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knauss, J. (1987). Die Melioration des Kopaisbeckens durch die Minyer im 2 Jt. v. Chr.Wasserbau und Siedlungsbedingungen im Altertum (Kopais 2) — Wasserbau und Wasser-wirtschaft, No. 57, Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knauss, J. (1989). Mykenische Wasser-banten in Arkadien, Böotien und Thessalien — mut-massliche Zielsetzung und rekonstruierbare Wirkungsweise, in Akten Kongress Wasser, Berlin, pp. 31–70.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knauss, J. (1996). Argolische Studien: Alte Strassen — Alte Wasserbauten, Wasserbau und Wasserwirtschaft, No. 77, Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leontiadis, I. and Dimitroulas. C. (1972). The use of radioisotopes in tracing karst groundwa-ter in Greece, III, Investigation on the possible interconnection between Nestani sinkhole and submarine springs of Argos area, Democritos Nucl. Res. Cent., Athens, Demo 72/3E, Athens.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leontiadis, I. and Dimitroulas. C. (1973). The use of radioisotopes in tracing karst groundwa-ter in Greece, IV, Investigation on the possible interconnection between sinkholes of Milia and Taka lake with various springs of the near area, Democritos Nucl. Res. Cent., Athens, Demo 73/4E, Athens.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lüttig, G. (1966). Die nichtmarinen Neogen — Becken im Mittelmeerraum und ihre Bedeutung für die Stratigraphie, in Comm. Neogen Strat., Proceedings, 3rd Session, Bern, 1964, Leiden.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mariolakos, I. (1998). The geomythological geotope of Lerni Springs (Argolis, Greece), Geo-logica Balcanica 28(3/4), 101–108.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mariolakos, I. (2002). The geoenvironmental dimension of Greek mythology, in Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of the Geological Society of Greece, Athens, September 2001, Bull. Geological Soc. Greece XXXXIV(6), 2065–2086.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mariolakos, I.D. and Mariolakos, D.I. (2004). The argon field in Arcadia, the sinkhole of Nest-ani Village, the God Poseidon and the submarine Dini Springs in Argolic Gulf (Peloponnesus, Greece). A geomythological approach of the Poseidon birth, in Proceedings of the 10th International Congress, Thessaloniki, April 2004, Bull. Geological Soc. Greece XXXVI, 2004, 1146–1153 (
  15. 15.
    Milankovitch, M. (1941). Kanon der Erdbestrahlung und seine Anwendung auf dem Eiszeiten-problem, Royal Serbian Sciences, Spec. Publ. 132, Section of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Vol. 33, Belgrade, 633 pp.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paepe, R. (1986). Landscape changes in Greece as a result of changing climate during the quaternary, in Desertification in Europe, R. Fantechi and N. Margaris (Eds.), D. Reidel Publ.Co., Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pausanias, Arcadica.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Philippson, A. (1892). Der Pelopones. Berlin 1891–92, 642 pp.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zeggelis, K.D. (1891). The Science of Nature in Homer, University of Patras Publications (Preface by S.A. Paipetis), Patras, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations