Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Falk Symposium ((FASS,volume 160))

  • 624 Accesses

Abstract

Liver biopsies are obtained as a diagnostic measure to either evaluate diffuse liver diseases or focal liver processes. Since liver biopsy, despite technical improvements, is not without risk for the patient1, its indication has to be made carefully in a proper clinical context. The information obtained following liver biopsy has to have an impact on the therapeutic decision (therapy planning, prognosis assessment)2 and cannot be achieved by an easier, cheaper, or less invasive procedure. Thus the application of liver biopsy is subjected to changes in diagnostic algorithms, therapeutic options, and disease management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Giusti G. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68, 276 biopsies. J Hepatol. 1986;2:165–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grant A, Neuberger J. Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice. British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut. 1999;45 (Suppl. 4):IV1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crawford AR, Lin XZ, Crawford JM. The normal adult human liver biopsy: a quantitative reference standard. Hepatology. 1998;28:323–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pradat P, Alberti A, Poynard T et al. Predictive value of ALT levels for histologic findings in chronic hepatitis C: a European collaborative study. Hepatology. 2002;36:973–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Desmet VJ, Gerber M, Hoofnagle JH, Manns M, Scheuer PJ. Classification of chronic hepatitis: diagnosis, grading and staging. Hepatology. 1994;19:1513–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Batts KP, Ludwig J. Chronic hepatitis. An update on terminology and reporting. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19:1409–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1995;22:696–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology. 1996;24:289–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandez-Rodriguez CM, Gutierrez ML, Serrano PL et al. Factors influencing the rate of fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:1971–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Monto A, Patel K, Bostrom A et al. Risks of a range of alcohol intake on hepatitis C-related fibrosis. Hepatology. 2004;39:826–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh MJ, Vanags DM, Clouston AD et al. Steatosis and liver cell apoptosis in chronic hepatitis C: a mechanism for increased liver injury. Hepatology. 2004;39:1230–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marcellin P, Asselah T, Boyer N. Fibrosis and disease progression in hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2002;36(Suppl. 1):S47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alvarez F, Berg PA, Bianchi FB et al. International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Report: Review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1999;31:929–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Czaja AJ, Davis GL, Ludwig J, Taswell HP. Complete resolution of inflammatory activity following corticosteroid treatment of HBsAg-negative chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology. 1984;4:622–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dienstag JL. The role of liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2002;36(Suppl. 1): S152–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chevallier M, Guerret S, Chossegros P, Gerard F, Grimaud JA. A histological semiquantitative scoring system for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in needle liver biopsy specimens: comparison with morphometric studies. Hepatology. 1994;20:349–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29:1705–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J et al. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:343–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miele L, Forgione A, Gasbarrini G, Grieco A. Noninvasive assessment of fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Transl Res. 2007;149:114–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Castera L, Forns X, Alberti A. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using transient elastography. J Hepatol. 2008;48:835–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheuer P. Primary biliary cirrhosis. Proc R Soc Med. 1967;60:1257–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ludwig J, Dickson ER, McDonald GS. Staging of chronic nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis (syndrome of primary biliary cirrhosis). Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1978;379:103–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Locke GR 3rd, Therneau TM, Ludwig J, Dickson ER, Lindor KD. Time course of histological progression in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1996;23:52–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van der Borght S, Libbrecht L, Katoonizadeh A et al. Nuclear beta-catenin staining and absence of steatosis are indicators of hepatocellular adenomas with an increased risk of malignancy. Histopathology. 2007;51:855–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bioulac-Sage P, Rebouissou S, Thomas C et al. Hepatocellular adenoma subtype classification using molecular markers and immunohistochemistry. Hepatology. 2007;46:740–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Di Tommaso L, Franchi G, Park YN et al. Diagnostic value of HSP70, glypican 3, and glutamine synthetase in hepatocellular nodules in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;45:725–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer and Falk Foundation e.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Flechtenmacher, C., Longerich, T., Schirmacher, P. (2008). Do we still need liver biopsies?. In: Ferkolj, I., Gangl, A., Galle, P.R., Vucelic, B. (eds) Pathogenesis and Clinical Practice in Gastroenterology. Falk Symposium, vol 160. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8767-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8767-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8766-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8767-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics