Skip to main content

Digital X-Ray Imaging

  • Conference paper

Abstract

The use of X-ray image receptors that produce a digital image is becoming increasingly important. Possible benefits include improved dynamic range and detective quantum efficiency, improved detectability for objects of low intrinsic contrast, and reduced radiation dose. The image can be available quickly. The display is separated from the image capture so that processing and contrast adjustment are possible before the image is viewed. The availability of a digital image means ready input into PACS and opens up the possibility of computer-aided detection and classification of abnormality. Possible drawbacks of digital systems include high cost, limited high contrast resolution and the fact that their clinical value is sometimes not proven in comparison with conventional, analogue techniques. The high contrast resolution attainable with such systems is discussed and the problem of sampling limitations and aliasing considered. The properties and limitations of digital systems using computed radiography, caesium iodide plus CCDs and active matrix arrays with either caesium iodide or selenium detectors are demonstrated. Examples are given of digital systems for mammography and general radiography and their performance is demonstrated in terms of clinical assessment and measurements of the modulation transfer function and detective quantum efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dobbins, J.T., 1995, Effects of under-sampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems, Med. Phys. 22 171-181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maidment, A.D.A., Fahrig, R., and Yaffe, M.J., 1993, Dynamic range requirements in digital mammography, Med. Phys. 20 1621-1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cunningham, I.A., Westmore, M.S., and Fenster, A., 1994, A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems, Med. Phys. 21 417-427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rowlands, J.A., 2002, The physics of computed radiography, Phys. Med. Biol. 47 R123-R166

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yaffe, M.J. and Rowlands, J.A., 1997, X-ray detectors for digital radiography, Phys. Med. Biol. 42 1-39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hejazi, S. and Trauernicht, D.P, 1996, Potential image quality in scintillator CCD-based sys- tems for digital radiography and digital mammography, SPIE 2708 440-449

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tesic, M.M., Fisher Piccaro, M., and Munder, B., 1999, Full field digital mammography scan- ner. Eur. J. Radiol. 31 2-17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pisano, E.D., Gatsonis, C., Hendrick, E., et al., 2005, Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening, NEJM 353 1773-1783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Samei, E. and Flynn, M.J., 2002, An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems, Med. Phys. 29 447-459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Samei, E. and Flynn, M.J., 2003, An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems, Med. Phys. 30 608-622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kengyelics, S.M., Cowen, A.R., and Davies, A.G., 1999, Image quality evaluation of a direct digital radiography system in a UK radiology department, SPIE 3659 124-135

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Muller, S., 1999, Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system, Eur. J. Radiol. 31 25-34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Siebert, J.A., Filipow, L.J., and Andriole, K.R., (Eds) 1999, Practical Digital Imaging and PACS. AAPM monograph no 25. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vedantham, S., Karallas, A., Suryanarayanan, S., et al., 2000, Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics for a clinical prototype, Med. Phys. 27 558-567

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dance, D.R. (2008). Digital X-Ray Imaging. In: Lemoigne, Y., Caner, A. (eds) Molecular Imaging: Computer Reconstruction and Practice. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8752-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics