Advertisement

O-Chord: A Method for Locating Relational Data Sources in a P2P Environment

  • Raddad Al King
  • Abdelkader Hameurlain
  • Franck Morvan

Abstract

Due to the characteristics of Peer-to-Peer systems, SQL query processing in these systems is more complex than traditional distributed DBMS. In this context, semantic and structural heterogeneity of local schemas create a real problem for locating data sources. Schema heterogeneity prevents peers to exchange their data in a comprehensive way. It could lead to incorrect answers for the localization query. In this paper, we propose O-Chord method which integrates domain ontology in Chord protocol [22]. This integration provides comprehensive data exchange while carrying out efficient data sources localization. Our proposed method allows Chord protocol to select the relevant data sources to answer the localization query.

Keywords

Global Schema Local Schema Domain Ontology Localization Phase Localization Query 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Adali, K. Candan, Y. Papakonstantinou, and V. Subrahmanian, "Query Caching and Optimization in Distributed Mediator Systems", Proc. SIGMOD, pp. 137-148, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Arenas et al., “The Hyperion Project: From Data Integration to Data Coordination”, SIGMOD Record 32(3), pp. 53-58, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Chandrasekaran, J. R. Josephson and V. R. Benjamins, “What Are Ontologies, and Why Do We Need Them?”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, pp. 20-26, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chord project homepage, http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/chord.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O.M. Duschka and M.R. Genesereth, “Answering Recursive Queries Using Views” Proc. 16th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium. Principles of Database Systems, pp. 109-116, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.O. Everett et al., “Making ontologies work for resolving redundancies across documents”. Communication of the ACM, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 55-60, 2002.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Faye, G. Nachouki and P. Valduriez, “SenPeer, Un système Pair-à-Pair de médiation de données”, Research Report, INRIA, 2006, pp. 24-48, ARIMA.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Faye, G. Nachouki and P. Valduriez, “Semantic Query routing in SenPeer, a P2P Data Management System”, Network-Based Information systems, first international conference, NBis2007, Regensburg, Germany, September, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Rodriguez-Gianolli et al., “Data Sharing in the Hyperion Peer Database System”, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pp. 1291-1294, 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gnutella homepage, http://www.gnutella.com.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. R. Gruber, “A Translation approach to portable ontology specifications”, International Journal of Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-based Systems, Vol. 5, No.2 , 1993.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Halevy, Z. Ives, P. Mork and I. Tatarinov, “Piazza : Data Management Infrastructure for Semantic Web Applications”, In Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on World Wide Web, Budapest, pp. 556-567, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Halevy et al., “The Piazza Peer Data Management System”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 16, N. 7, PP. 787-798, July, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Hasse et al., “Bibster - A Semantics-Based Bibliographic Peer-to-Peer System”, Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004), Hiroshima, Japan, November, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Huebsch et al. “Querying the Internet with PIER”. 29th VLDB, Berlin, Germany, 2003.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Huebsch et al. “The Architecture of PIER: an Internet-Scale Query Processor”. CIDR, 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kazaa homepage, http:// www.Kazaa.com.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.Y. Levy, A. Rajaraman and J. J. Ordille. “Querying Heterogeneous Information Sources Using Source Descriptions”, In Proceedings of 22nd VLDB, pp. 251-262, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Garcia-Molina et al., ”The TSIMMIS Project: Integration of Heterogeneous Information Sources,” Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 117-132, March, 1997.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. S. Ng, B. C. Ooi, K. Tan and A. Zhou, “PeerDB : A P2P-based System for Distributed Data Sharing”, in Proc. of the 19th International Conference on Data Engineering, Bangalore, India, pp. 633-644, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Özsu and P. Valduriez, “Principles of Distributed Database Systems”. 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, 1999.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. Stoica, et al. “Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-Peer Lookup Service for Internet Applications”, SIGCOMM’01, San Diego, California, USA, 2001.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Sun and D. X. Liu, “Using Ontologies for Semantic Optimization of XML Databases”, KDXD 2006, Singapore, April, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raddad Al King
    • 1
  • Abdelkader Hameurlain
    • 1
  • Franck Morvan
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (IRIT)Université Paul SabatierF-31062 Toulouse Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations