Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper reports on developing a framework for Web-based EServices Acceptance Model (E-SAM). The paper argues that user experience, user motivation, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use may influence user acceptance of web-based eServices. The model was examined at a university where students and staff use services that have moved from a paper-based to Web-based eService system. The findings from the data analysis suggest that user experience is strongly related to perceived ease of use; and perceived usefulness to user motivation in user acceptance of Web-based eServices. The bonding of these variables and the lack of strong relationships between other components suggest that the model’s application to eServices and highlight a research framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Accenture (2003). Innovation Delivered. www.accenture.com/webservices

    Google Scholar 

  2. Datamonitor (2000). The U.S. market for Internet-based customer service. ReportNo. DMTC0681.April2000. www.datamonitor.com/∼60a60daeaab049e191c7be489b90b82f∼/all/reports/product_summary.asp?pid=DMTC0681

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khalifa, M., and Liu, V. (2003). “Satisfaction with Internet-Based Services: The Role of Expectations and Desires". International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(2):31-49.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaltenmark, J (2003). Innovation Delivered. Accenture Report on Web Services. www.accenture.com/webservices

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, F. D. (1989). “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.” MIS Quarterly 13(2): 319-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). “User Acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models.” Management Science 34(8): 982-1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heijden, H (2000). “Using the Technology Acceptance Model to predict website usage: Extensions and Empirical test. Research Memorandum 2000-25, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gefen, D., and Straub, D. (2000). “The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 1 Article 8: 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M.G. (2000). Why don’t mean ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24: 115-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wright, K.M., and Granger, M.J. (2001). Using the web as a strategic resource: an applied classroom exercise. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Intl. Academy for Inf. Management, New Orleans, Louisiana

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steer, D., Turner, P., and Spencer, S. (2000). “Issues in adapting the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to investigate non-workplace usage behavior on the world-wide-web. School of Inf. Systems, University of Tasmania.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morris, M.G., and Turner, J.M. (2001). Assessing users’ subjective quality of experience with the World Wide Web: an exploratory examination of temporal changes in technology acceptance. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer studies. 54: 877-901.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bowman, R.F., Jr. (1982). A Pac-Man Theory of Motivation: Tactical implications for classroom instruction. Educational Technology 22(9): 14-16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and LeFevre, J. (1989). “Optimal experience in work and leisure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(5): 815-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, S. (1973). Ends, Means, and Galumphing: Some Leitmotifs of Play, American Anthropologist 75:87-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Webster, J., Trevino, L.K., and Ryan, L. (1993). “The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions.” Computer in Human Behavior 9: 411-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruyter, K. D., Wetzels, M., and Kleijnen, M. (2001). “Customer adoption of eService: an experimental study.” Intl. Journal of Service Industry Management 12(2): 184-207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffman, D. L., and Novak, T.P. (1995). “Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations.” Research Program on Marketing in Computer-Mediated Environments: 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vallerand, R.J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 29: 271-360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, NY: Plenum Pr.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moore, G., and Benbasat, I. (1991). “Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an Information Technology innovation.” IS Res 2(3): 192-221.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pitkow, J.E., and Recker, M.M., (1995). “Using Web as a survey tool: Results from the second WWW user survey. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 27(6): 809-822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Corea, S. (2000). “Technological capacitation in customer service work: A sociotechnical approach. In P.DeGross and J.I.DeGroass (eds), Proceedings of the Twelfth-First ICIS. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 45-47.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A., and Malhotra, A. (2000). “A Conceptual framework for understanding eService Quality: Implications for future Research and managerial Practice.” Marketing Science Institute, Working paper, Report no: 00-115

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sandhu, K., and Corbitt, B (2002). “Exploring an understanding of Electronic Service end-user adoption,” The International Federation for Inf. Processing, WG8.6, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Karahanna, E; Straub, D.W., and Chervany, N.L. (1999). “Information Technology Adoption Across Time.” MIS Quarterly, 23(2): 183-213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chin, W.W., and Lee, M.K.O. (2000). A proposed model and measurement instrument for the formation of IS satisfaction: Proc. of the ICIS, Atlanta: AIS, 553-563.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wold, H. (1985). “Partial Least Squares", in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, vol.6, Kotz, S and Johnson, N.L. (eds), John Wiley and Sons, NY, 581-591

    Google Scholar 

  30. Compeau, D.R., and Higgins, C.A. (1995). “Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. IS Res, 6(2): 118-143

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chatelin, Y.M., Vinzi, V.E., and Tenenhaus, M. (2002). “State-of-art on PLS Path Modelling through the available software.” HEC School of Bus and Mgt, France.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sandhu, K. (2008). E-Services Acceptance Model (E-SAM). In: Sobh, T. (eds) Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8740-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8741-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics