Advertisement

Soft Biometrical Students Identification Method for e-Learning

  • Deniss Kumlander

Abstract

bf The paper describes a soft biometrical characteristics based approach to the students’ identification process to be used mainly for e-learning environments. This approach is designed to increase security of the examination process from the involved attendees’ identification point of view and should improve the overall security in relatively weakly protected e-learning systems. The approach is called "soft" as doesn’t require any special systems to be used other than e-learning pages embedded software. The paper discusses how the approach can be applied and what kind methods should be used together with the proposed one to produce a complete identification system for e-learning.

Keywords

Verification System Student Identification Biometrical Measure Examination Process Pattern Database 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    E. González-Agulla, E. Argones-Rúa, C. García-Mateo, and ó W. M. Flórez, “Development and Implementation of a Biometric Verification System for E-learning Platforms”, EDUTECH, Computer-Aided Design Meets Computer-Aided Learning, IFIP 18th World Computer Congress, 2004, pp. 155-164.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    O. Guven, S. Akyokus, M. Uysal, and A. Guven, “Enhanced password authentication through keystroke typing characteristics”, Proceedings of the 25th conference on Proceedings of the 25th IASTED International Multi-Conference: artificial intelligence and applications, 2007, pp. 317-322.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. K. Jain, A. Ross, S. Prabhakar, “An Introduction to Biometric Recognition”, IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, 2004, pp 4-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. K. Jain, L. Hong, and S. Pankanti, “Biometric Identification”, Communications of ACM, vol. 43, no.2, 2000, pp. 91-98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Illonen, “Keystroke dynamics”, In Advanced Topics in Information Processing Lectures, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Gaines, W. Lisowski, S. Press, and N. Shapiro, “Authentication by Keystroke Timing: some preliminary results”, Rand Report R-256-NSF, Rand Corporation, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Joyce and G. K. Gupta, “Identity Authentication Based on Keystroke Latencies”, Commun. ACM, vol. 33, no. 2, 1990, pp. 168-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    I.Sogukpinar, L. Yalçin, “User identification via keystroke dynamics”, Ist. Üniv. Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, 2004, pp. 995-1005.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Bleha, C. Slivinsky, and B. Hussien, “Computer-access security systems using keystroke dynamics”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 12, 1990, pp. 1217-1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Y. Sheng, V. V. Phoha and S. M. Rovnyak, “A parallel decision tree-based method for user authentication based on keystroke patterns”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 35, no. 4, 2005, pp. 826-833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    E. Yu and S. Cho, “GA-SVM wrapper approach for feature subset selection in keystroke dynamics identity verification”, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol 3, 2003, pp. 20-2253 – 2257.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    B. Hussien, R. McLaren, and S. Bleha, “An application of fuzzy algorithms in a computer access security system”, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 39-43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deniss Kumlander
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsTallinn University of TechnologyEstonia

Personalised recommendations