This paper presents an experiment on judgments of design complexity, based on two modes of stimuli: the layouts of corridor systems in buildings shown in plan view and movies of simulated walkthroughs. Randomly selected stimuli were presented to 166 subjects: ‘experts’ (architects or students currently enrolled on an architectural course) and ‘lay people’ (all others). The aims were to investigate whether there were differences between these two groups in terms of their judgments of building complexity, effects of modality of stimuli and if any environmental measures (geometric or complexity-based) correlated with the assessments. The results indicate that indeed complexity and wayfinding ratings show distinct patterns. Architects are more sensitive to differences between complexity and wayfinding ratings in the plan views, while lay-people provided more distinctive ratings for movies. Similarly, lay-people judged the same materials to be simpler and easier when seen as ego-centric movies, with architects showing the opposite pattern. The judgments of both groups correlated highly with a number of environmental measures, with architects providing greater differentiation regarding layout symmetry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Attneave F: (1957) Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. J. Exp. Psych 53: 221–227
Batty M (2001) Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28(1): 123 – 150
Bromme R, Rambow R, Nückles M (2001) Expertise and estimating what other people know: The influence of professional experience and type of knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7: 317–330
Brösamle M, Hölscher C (2007) Architects seeing through the eyes of building users. In Barkowsky T, Bilda, Z Hölscher, C Vrachliotis, G (Eds.), Spatial cognition in architectural design. Melbourne, Australia
Butler D, Acquino A, Hissong A, Scott P (1993) Wayfinding by newcomers in a complex building. Human Factors 35(1): 159–173
Cross N (2006) Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer-Verlag London
Gärling T, Böök A, Lindberg E (1986) Spatial orientation and wayfinding in the designed environment: A conceptual analysis and some suggestions for postoccupancy evaluation. Journal of Architectural Planning Resources 3: 55– 64
Gero JS, Jupp JR (2002) Measuring the information content of architectural plans. In Hippolyte PL ' Miralles E (eds), SIGraDi Caracas 2002, Ediciones Uni. Central de Venezuela: 155–158
Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hillier B (2007) Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax, London
Jackson H (2001) Towards a symbiotic coevolutionary approach to architecture. In Creative Evolutionary Systems, Bentley PJ and Corne DW (eds), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
Koffka K (1935) Principles of gestalt psychology. Harcourt Brace Javanovich, New York
Köhler W (1929) Gestalt psychology. Liveright, New York
Leeuwenberg ELJ (1968) Structural information of visual patterns. Mouton & Co
Montello D (2007) The contribution of space syntax to a comprehensive theory of environmental psychology. Proceedings of 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul
O'Neill MJ (1991) Effects of signage and floor plan configuration on wayfind-ing accuracy. Environment and Behavior 23(5): 553–574
Passini R (1996) Wayfinding design: logic, application and some thoughts on universality. Design Studies 17(3): 319–331
Peponis J, Zimring C, Choi YK (1990). Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment and Behavior 22(5): 555–590
Sha R, Bod R (1993) Computational esthetics (English translation of “Compu-tationele Esthetica”, originally published in Dutch in Informatie en Infor-matiebeleid 11(1): 54–63l)
Weaver W, Shannon CE (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Illinois, University of Illinois
Weisman J (1981) Evaluating architectural legibility: Way-finding in the built environment. Environment and Behavior 13: 189–204
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hölscher, C., Dalton, R.C. (2008). Comprehension of Layout Complexity: Effects of Architectural Expertise and Mode of Presentation. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '08. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8727-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8728-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)