Skip to main content

Diagrams as Tools in the Design of Information Systems

  • Conference paper
Design Computing and Cognition '08

Design typically relies on diagrams to offload memory and information processing and to promote discovery and inferences. Design of information systems, in contrast to design of buildings and products, depends on topological connectivity rather than Euclidean distance. Understanding graph topology and manipulating graphs are essential skills in the design of information systems, because graph manipulation facilitates the refinement of designs and the generation of alternative designs. Here, we found that students of systems design have difficulties interpreting diagrams, revealing two biases, a sequential bias and a reading order bias. The results have implications for teaching as well as diagram design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Larkin JH, Simon H (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words? Cognitive Science 11: 65–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tversky B (2001) Spatial schemas in depictions. In M Gattis (ed), Spatial schemas and abstract thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tversky B, Zacks J, Lee PU, Heiser J (2000) Lines, blobs, crosses, and arrows: Diagrammatic communication with schematic figures. In M Anderson, P Cheng, V Haarslev (eds), Theory and application of diagrams, Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nickerson JV (2005) The meaning of arrows: Diagrams and other facets in system sciences literature. 38th Hawaii Int. Conference on System Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor HA, Tversky B (1992) Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory and Cognition 20: 483–496

    Google Scholar 

  6. Committee on Support for Thinking Spatially (2006) Learning to think spatially. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peterson LL, Davie BS (2007) Computer networks: A systems approach. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Larkin JH, McDermott J, Simon DP, Simon HA (1980) Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science 208: 1335–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chi M Feltovich P, Glaser R (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 8: 121–152

    Google Scholar 

  11. Suwa M, Tversky B (1997) What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies 18: 385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information research. MIS Quarterly 28: 75–105

    Google Scholar 

  13. March ST, Smith GF (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15: 251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charete RN (2005) Why software fails. IEEE Spectrum 42: 42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harel D (1988) On visual formalisms, CACM 31: 514–530

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Fowler M (2004) UML distilled: A brief guide to the standard object modeling language. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lange CFJ, Chaudron MRV, Muskens J (2006) In practice: UML software architecture and design description. Software IEEE 23: 40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nickerson JV (2006) Teaching the integration of information systems technologies. IEEE Transactions on Education 49: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Corter JE, Zahner DC (2007) Use of external visual representations in probability problem solving. Statistics Education Research Journal 6: 22–50

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heiser J, Tversky B, Silverman M (2004) Sketches for and from collaboration,. In JS Gero, B Tversky, T Knight (eds), Visual and spatial reasoning in design III, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glenberg AM, Langston WE (1992) Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. J. of Memory and Language 31: 129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nickerson, J.V., Corter, J.E., Tversky, B., Zahner, D., Rho, Y.J. (2008). Diagrams as Tools in the Design of Information Systems. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '08. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8727-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8728-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics