Advertisement

Diagrams as Tools in the Design of Information Systems

  • Jeffrey V. Nickerson
  • James E. Corter
  • Barbara Tversky
  • Doris Zahner
  • Yun Jin Rho

Design typically relies on diagrams to offload memory and information processing and to promote discovery and inferences. Design of information systems, in contrast to design of buildings and products, depends on topological connectivity rather than Euclidean distance. Understanding graph topology and manipulating graphs are essential skills in the design of information systems, because graph manipulation facilitates the refinement of designs and the generation of alternative designs. Here, we found that students of systems design have difficulties interpreting diagrams, revealing two biases, a sequential bias and a reading order bias. The results have implications for teaching as well as diagram design.

Keywords

Short Path Unify Modeling Language Commission Error Omission Error Forward Path 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Larkin JH, Simon H (1987) Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words? Cognitive Science 11: 65–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tversky B (2001) Spatial schemas in depictions. In M Gattis (ed), Spatial schemas and abstract thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tversky B, Zacks J, Lee PU, Heiser J (2000) Lines, blobs, crosses, and arrows: Diagrammatic communication with schematic figures. In M Anderson, P Cheng, V Haarslev (eds), Theory and application of diagrams, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nickerson JV (2005) The meaning of arrows: Diagrams and other facets in system sciences literature. 38th Hawaii Int. Conference on System SciencesGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor HA, Tversky B (1992) Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory and Cognition 20: 483–496Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Committee on Support for Thinking Spatially (2006) Learning to think spatially. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peterson LL, Davie BS (2007) Computer networks: A systems approach. Morgan Kaufmann, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larkin JH, McDermott J, Simon DP, Simon HA (1980) Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science 208: 1335–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chi M Feltovich P, Glaser R (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 8: 121–152Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suwa M, Tversky B (1997) What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies 18: 385–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information research. MIS Quarterly 28: 75–105Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    March ST, Smith GF (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15: 251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charete RN (2005) Why software fails. IEEE Spectrum 42: 42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harel D (1988) On visual formalisms, CACM 31: 514–530MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fowler M (2004) UML distilled: A brief guide to the standard object modeling language. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lange CFJ, Chaudron MRV, Muskens J (2006) In practice: UML software architecture and design description. Software IEEE 23: 40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nickerson JV (2006) Teaching the integration of information systems technologies. IEEE Transactions on Education 49: 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Corter JE, Zahner DC (2007) Use of external visual representations in probability problem solving. Statistics Education Research Journal 6: 22–50Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heiser J, Tversky B, Silverman M (2004) Sketches for and from collaboration,. In JS Gero, B Tversky, T Knight (eds), Visual and spatial reasoning in design III, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glenberg AM, Langston WE (1992) Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. J. of Memory and Language 31: 129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey V. Nickerson
    • 1
  • James E. Corter
    • 2
  • Barbara Tversky
    • 2
  • Doris Zahner
    • 1
  • Yun Jin Rho
    • 2
  1. 1.Stevens Institute of TechnologyUSA
  2. 2.Columbia UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations