Conceptualizing Tangible Augmented Reality Systems for Design Learning

  • Rui Chen
  • Xiangyu Wang

New forms of combining tangible interfaces and Augmented Reality (AR) systems are the supporting technologies which can be devised to leverage the way learners develop skills/knowledge in the design process. The paper presents a theoretical framework which conceptualizes how tangible AR spatial interactive systems can be utilized to support cognitive development of design learning. The framework can be applied not only to evaluate existing tangible AR interfaces, but to conceptualize new prototypes for design learning activities.

Keywords

Dition Sonal Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Holmquist L, Schmidt A, Ullmer B (2004) Tangible interfaces in perspective: guest editors' introduction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8(5): 291–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ishii H, Ullmer B (1997) Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. Proceedings of CHI 1997, ACM Press, pp. 234–241Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pangaro G, Maynes-Aminzade D, Ishii H (2003) The actuated workbench: computer-controlled actuation in tabletop tangible interfaces, Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, October 27–30, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doswell JT, Blake MB (2006) Mobile Augmented Reality system architecture for ubiquitous e-Learning. Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education - (WMTE'06)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Department of Defense (2002) Augmented reality for ship survivability, live fire test and training program. url: https://www2.afams.af.mil/programs /projects/lftt/projects/aug_shi.htm, last update April 2005
  6. 6.
    Schwald B, Laval B (2003) An augmented reality system for training and assistance to maintenance in the industrial context. Journal of WSCGGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaufmann H, Schmalstieg D, Wagner M (2000) Construct3D: a virtual reality application for mathematics and geometry education. Education and Information Technologies 5(4): 263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wagner D, Barakonyi I (2003) Augmented reality Kanji learning. Proceedings of the Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Asai K, Kobayashi H, Kondo T (2005) Advanced learning technologies. Proceedings of ICALT: 213–215Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hornecker E, Burr J (2006) Getting a grip on tangible interaction. Proceedings of CHI 2006, ACM Press:437–446Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bongers B (2002) Interactivating spaces. Proceedings of 14th Annual Conference on Systems Research, Informatics, and Cybernetics, Baden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned reflexes: an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortexGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lakoff G, Johnson M (1999) Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books, NYGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luger G (1994) Cognitive science: the science of intelligent systems. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zeisel J (2006) Inquiry by design: environment/behaviours/neuroscience for architecture, interiors, landscape and planning, second edition. WW Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kamaruddin A, Dix A (2006) Understanding physicality on desktop: preliminary results. First International Workshop for Physicality, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barsalou LW, Wiemer-Hastings K (2005) Situating abstract concepts. In Pecher, D and Zwaan, R (eds), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Though,: Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barsalou LW, Niedenthal, PM, Barbey, A, Ruppert, JA (2003) Social embodiment. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 43: 43–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Antle AN (2007) Child-based personas: need, ability and experience. Cognition, Technology and Work, Special Issue on Child Computer Interaction: Methodological Research, Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klemmer S, Hartmann B, Takayama L (2006) How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In Proc. DIS 2006, ACM Press: 140–148Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ullmer B (2002) Tangible interfaces for manipulating aggregates of digital information. PhD thesis, MIT Media LabGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rui Chen
    • 1
  • Xiangyu Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations