Skip to main content

Dutch Cost Savings in Unit-Based Pricing of Household Waste

  • Chapter
  • 600 Accesses

Abstract

We estimate the effects of four unit-based pricing systems on waste collected in Dutch municipalities. Unit-based pricing is shown to be effective in reducing unsorted and compostable waste and in stimulating recyclable waste. If the estimations are corrected for differences in environmental activism between municipalities the effects are still large but significantly lower. The bag-based and weight-based systems perform equally and far better compared with the frequency-based and volume-based systems. This is interesting, as administrative costs are significantly lower for the bag-based system. Finally, unit-based pricing has no effect on the amounts of waste collected in surrounding municipalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References List

  • Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (1997). The impact of state and local policies on the recycling effort. Eastern Economic Journal, 4, 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf, E., Aalbers, R. F. T., & Varkevisser, M. (2001). Afvalprijzen zonder grens (“Waste prices without borders”), Studies in Economic Policy 4, Rotterdam: Erasmus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. H. J. M., & Melenberg, B. (2003). The institutional choice of refuse collection: determining variables in the Netherlands. Empirical Economics, 28, 553–570, (reproduced as chapter 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., & Kinnaman, T. C. (1996). Household responses to pricing garbage by the bag. American Economic Review, 86, 971–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J. (1999). The effect of unit pricing system upon household solid waste management: the Korean experience. Journal of Environmental Management, 57, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., Adams, R. M., & Love, H. A. (1993). An economic analysis of household recycling of solid waste: the case of Portland, Oregon. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25, 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. R. (1993). The economics of solid waste reduction: the impact of user fees. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. R., Martinez, S. A., Palmer, K., & Podolsky, M. J. (2003). The determinants of household recycling: a material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 294–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnaman, T. C., & Fullerton, D. (1997). Garbage and recycling in communities with curbside recycling and unit-based pricing. NBER Working Paper 6021, Cambridge: NBER,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnaman, T. C., & Fullerton, D. (2000). Garbage and recycling with endogenous local policy. Journal of Urban Economics, 48, 419–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linderhof, V., Kooreman, P., Allers, M., & Wiersma, D. (2001). Weight-based pricing in the collection of household waste: the Oostzaan case. Resource and Energy Economics, 23, 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolsky, M. J., & Spiegel, M. (1998). Municipal waste disposal: unit-pricing and recycling opportunities. Public Works Management and Policy, 3, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschovsky, J. D., & Stone, S. E. (1994). Market incentives to encourage household waste recycling: paying for what you throw away. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13, 120–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strathman, J. G., Rufolo, A. M., & Mildner, G. C.S. (1995). The demand for solid waste disposal. Land Economics, 71, 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtven, G. L., & Morris, G. E. (1999). Household behavior under alternative pay-as-you-throw systems for solid waste disposal. Land Economics, 75, 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VROM (1997). Ervaringen met tariefdifferentiatie en huishoudelijk afval (“Experience with differentiated tariffs and domestic waste”). Den Haag: Ministry of Environmental Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, K. L. (1976). Economic factors influencing households’ production of refuse. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2, 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. (2008). Dutch Cost Savings in Unit-Based Pricing of Household Waste. In: Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. (eds) The Waste Market. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8711-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics