Abstract
This chapter discusses the possible cost savings of contracting out refuse collection in the Netherlands. Our findings indicate that similar to foreign econometric studies cost savings of approximately 15–20% apply to the Netherlands. Moreover, compared with the existing literature we show that different production technologies apply to internal municipal waste collection units and external refuse collection firms. Different cost functions have to be estimated for the sub-samples. Though significant cost savings exist on contracting out waste collection, households will not experience these cost savings on a one to one basis. Private refuse collection firms must pay VAT while public entities are exempted. Thus, the fiscal system hinders a more pronounced role for private refuse collection firms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References List
Apergis, N., Papanastasiou, J., & Velentzas K (1997). The credibility of policy announcements: Greek evidence. Applied Economics, 29, 699–705.
Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). Lectures on public economics. London: McGraw-Hill.
Bosch, N., Predaja, F., & Suárez-Pandiello, J. (2000). Measuring the efficiency of Spanish municipal refuse collection services. Local Government Studies, 26, 71–90
Chow, G. C. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28, 591–605
Collins, J. N., & Downes, B. T. (1977). The effects of size on the provision of public services: The case of solid waste collection in smaller cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12, 333–347.
Cubbin, J., Domberger, S., Meadowcroft, S. (1987). Competitive tendering and refuse collection: Identifying the sources of efficiency gains. Fiscal Studies, 8, 49–58.
Diewert, W. E. (1987). Cost functions. In: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new Palgrave, a dictionary of economics(pp. 690–696). London: MacMillan.
Domberger, S., & Jensen, P. (1997). Contracting out by the public sector: theory, evidence and prospects. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4, 67–78.
Domberger, S., Meadowcroft, S., & Thompson, D. (1986). Competitive tendering and efficiency: The case of refuse collection. Fiscal Studies, 7, 69–87.
Domberger, S., Meadowcroft, S., & Thompson, D. (1988) Competition and efficiency in refuse collection: A reply. Fiscal Studies, 9, 86–90.
Fisher, F. M. (1970). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions: An expository note. Econometrica, 38, 361–366.
Ganley, J., & Grahl, J. (1988). Competition and efficiency in refuse collection: A critical comment. Fiscal Studies, 9, 80–85.
Hirsch, W. Z. (1965, February) Cost functions of an urban government service: refuse collection. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 87–92.
Kitchen, H. M. (1976). A statistical estimation of an operating cost function for municipal refuse collection. Public Finance Quarterly, 4, 43–72.
Lai, C. C. (1994) Market structure and inter-industry profit differences in Taiwan. Pakistan Development Review, 33, 147–163.
Loomis, J. B. (1989). Test-retest reliability of the contingent valuation method: A comparison of general population and visitor responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 76–84.
McDavid, J. (1985, Sept/Oct). The Canadian experience with privatising residential solid waste collection services. Public Administration Review, 45, 602–608.
Ohlsson, H. (1998). Ownership and Production Costs: Choosing between Public Production and Contracting Out. Uppsala University working paper 6.
Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1991). Econometric models & economic forecasts. New-York: McGraw-Hill.
Pommorehne, W. W., & Frey, B. S. (1977). Public versus private production efficiency in Switserland: A theoretical and empirical comparison. Urban Affairs Annual Review, 12, 221–241.
Reeves, E., & Barrow, M. (2000). The impact of contracting out on the costs of refuse collection services: The case of Ireland. Economic and Social Review, 31, 129–150.
Savas, E. (1977). Policy analysis for local government: Public vs. private refuse collection. Policy Analysis, 3, 49–74.
Savas, E. (1981). Intracity competition between public and private delivery. Public Administration Review, 41, 46–52.
Schmidt, P., & Sickles, R. (1977). Some further evidence on the use of the Chow test under heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 45, 1293–1298.
Stevens, B. J. (1978). Scale, market structure and the cost of refuse collection. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 438–448.
Szymanski, S., & Wilkins, S. (1993). Cheap rubbish? Competitive tendering and contracting out in refuse collection – 1981–1988. Fiscal Studies, 14, 109–130.
Szymanski, S. (1996). The impact of compulsory competitive tendering on refuse collection services. Fiscal Studies, 17, 1–19.
Thursby, J. G. (1992). A comparison of several exact and approximate tests for structural shift under heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 53, 363–386.
Toyoda, T. (1974). Use of the Chow test under heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 42, 601–608.
Wassenaar, M. C., & Gradus, R. H. J. M. (2001). Contracting out: the importance of a level playing field (Research Memorandum 0108). Erasmus University Rotterdam.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. (2008). Cost Savings of Contracting Out Refuse Collection in The Netherlands. In: Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R. (eds) The Waste Market. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8711-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8711-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8710-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8711-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)