This chapter deals with an overview of sensors used in the collection of data for Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology. For the purposes of this chapter, we divide sensor technologies into two basic categories. First, we discuss “invasive” technologies, which entail brain surgery procedures for implantation involving primarily multielectrode recordings from arrays of microelectrodes implanted directly into the brain to measure action potentials from single cells. This is a major growth area for sensor technologies and will be the major focus of this chapter. However, we caution that most of this technology is under development in animal models and is not yet approved for human use. In addition, measurements from subdural or epidural strips of electrode arrays used to record cortical potentials somewhat analogous to EEG-type recordings on the surface of the skull will be discussed, as this is currently the greatest application for use of these invasive electrodes in humans for (primarily) epilepsy surgery. However, this could help increase the growth of other BCI applications. Second, we discuss “noninvasive” technologies, which primarily involve multielectrode EEG recording arrays of “wet” silver (Ag) or gold (Au) conducting paste electrodes that are placed on the surface of the skull to record EEG activity. These electrodes are commercially available from a number of sources, but surprisingly, there has been limited growth in this area. We caution that “noninvasive” electrodes have largely been used acutely and may be more invasive to the scalp when used in future, more chronic, applications of BCI technology by humans at home or work. Additional tech-nology development in this area will be briefly discussed.
KeywordsElectrode Array Recording Site Sensor Technology Epilepsy Surgery Local Field Potential
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Burmeister, J.J., and G.A. Gerhardt. 2006. Neurochemical arrays. In Encyclopedia of sensors, Vol. 6, Eds. C. Grimes, E. Dickey, and M.V. Pishko. Stevenson Ranch, CA: American Scientific Publishers, 525.Google Scholar
- Chapin, J.K., M.A.L. Nicolelis, 2001. Brain Control of Sensorimotor Prostheses. In Neural prostheses for restoration of sensory and motor function. Eds. Chapin, J.K., and K.A. Moxon. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 235–261.Google Scholar
- Cheung, K.C. 2007. Implantable microscale neural interfaces. Biomed. MicrodevicesJan. 25 (epub), PMID: 17252207Google Scholar
- Heath R.G., S.M. Peacock, Jr., and W. Miller, Jr. 1953. Induced paroxysmal electrical activity in man recorded simultaneously through subcortical and scalp electrodes. Trans. Am. Neurol. Assoc. 3:247–250.Google Scholar
- Ludvig, N. 2001. Drug deliveries into the microenvironment of electrophysiologically monitored neurons in the brain of behaving rats and monkeys. In Neural prostheses for restoration of sensory and motor function. Eds. Chapin, J.K., and K.A. Moxon. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 263–283.Google Scholar
- Marzullo T.C., J.R. Dudley, C.R. Miller, L. Trejo, D.R. Kipke. 2005. Spikes, local field potentials, and electrocorticogram characterization during motor learning in rats for brainmachine interface tasks. Conf Proc IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 1:429–431.Google Scholar
- Olds, J., W.S. Allan, and E. Briese. 1971. Differentiation of hypothalamic drive and reward centers. Am. J. Physiol. 221(1):368–375.Google Scholar
- Pancrazio, J.J., P.P. Bey Jr., A. Loloee, S. Manne, H.C. Chao, L.L. Howard, W.M. Gosney, D.A. Borkholder, G.T. Kovacs, P. Manos, D.S. Cuttino, and D.A. Stenger. 1998. Description and demonstration of a CMOS amplifier-based system with measurement and stimulation capability for bioelectrical signal transduction. Biosens. Bioelectron. 13(9):971–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruffini, G., S. Dunne, E. Farres, P.C.P. Watts, E. Mendoza, S.R.P. Silva, C. Grau, J. Marco Pallares, L. Fuentemilla, and B. Vandecasteele. 2006. ENOBIO: First tests of a dry electrophysiology electrode using carbon nanotubes. In Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, New York City, Aug 30–Sept 3, 2006. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), 1826–1829.Google Scholar
- Song, Y.K., W.R. Patterson, C.W. Bull, J. Beals, N. Hwang, A.P. Deangelis, C. Lay, J.L. McKay, A.V. Nurmikko, M.R. Fellows, J.D. Simeral, J.P. Donoghue, and B.W. Connors. 2005. Development of a chipscale integrated microelectrode/microelectronic device for brain implantable neuroengineering applications. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng. 13:220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams, J.C., R.L. Rennaker, and D.R. Kipke. 1999. Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 4:303–313.Wise K.D., J.B. Angell and A. Starr 1970. An integrated-circuit approach to extracellular micro-electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 17(3):238–247. Williams, J.C., R.L. Rennaker, and D.R. Kipke. 1999. Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 4:303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wise K.D., and J.B. Angell. 1975. A low-capacitance multielectrode probe for use in extracellular neurophysiology. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 22(3):212–219. Wise K.D., J.B. Angell and A. Starr 1970. An integrated-circuit approach to extracellular micro-electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 17(3):238–247. Williams, J.C., R.L. Rennaker, and D.R. Kipke. 1999. Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 4:303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yoshida, K., W. Jensen, P. Norlin, M. Kindlundh, and U.G. Hofmann. 2001. Characterization of silicon microelectrodes from the EU VSAMUEL project. Biomediinische Technik446.Google Scholar