The important principle to draw from this chapter is that spatial enactment is the necessary source for cognitive understanding. Spatiality anchors cognitive meaning through the production of the virtual space of memory. The virtual space of memory is intertwined with actual space; without virtual memorial space we would not have experience. Rhetoric and the art of writing are spatially organized/organizing, which means that both the expression and the medium itself are co-constitutive and ambiguously both function as agencies/patients in a circular dialectic. The geographicity of remembering, forgetting, storing, misfiling, retrieving, and losing is intimately connected to, interrelated to, and mutually influential of, the geographicity of actual situations. The virtual space of memory is still an embodied space and this is a crucial point of our thesis. Both the body schema and the virtual body together form the imaginative body. The virtual space of memory requires participation of the body schema. The orator, for example, must ghost gesture walking through the rooms of his virtual house in order to enact his speech. Thus, the geography of the imagination provides an enactive geography of walking through rooms, which is then translated into the oration of a speech. Once again, we recognize the fundamental importance of geographies of the imagination to cultural/humanistic geography.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle. Poetics. Translated by Stephen Haliwell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Blum, Herwig. Die Antike Mnemotechnik. Hildesheim: Olms Verlag, 1969.
Boccaccio, Giovanni. The Decameron. Translated by G. H. Mc William. London: Penguin Books, 1995.
Borchardt, Frank. “Kleist’s Space.” South Atlantic Bulletin 45, no. 4 (November 1980): 1–14.
Cicero. Rhetorica ad Herennium. Translated by Harry Caplan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954.
Cicero. De Oratore. Translated by E. W. Sutton. London: Bohn, 1988.
Goldmann, Stefan. “Statt Totenklage Gedächtnis. Zur Erfindung der Menmotechnik durch Simonides von Keos.” Poetica 21 (1989): 43–66.
Halbwachs, Maurice. Collective Memory. Edited, translated, and with introduction by Lewis A. Coser. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Kant, Immanuel. “Transcendental Aesthetics.” In the Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Norman Kemp Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.
Kern, Stephen. The Culture of Time and Space. 1880–1918. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Kittler, Wolf. “The Diskuroi. Masters of the Information Channel.” Configurations 10 (2002): 111–127.
Kleist, Heinrich von. Sämtliche Werke und Briefe, Vol. II. Edited by Helmut Sembdner. München: Hanser Verlag, 1977.
Kleist, Heinrich von. “The Earthquake in Chili.” In “The Marquise of O” and Other Stories. Translated by David Luke and Nigel Reeves. London: Penguin Books, 1978, 51–67.
Krämer, Sybille. Symbolische Maschinen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesell-schaft, 1988.
Krämer, Sybille. “Writing, Notational Iconicity, Calculus. On Writing as a Cultural Technique.” Modern Language Notes 118, no. 3 (German Issue/April 2003). Edited by Rüdiger Campe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003, 518–537.
Lachmann, Renate. “Die Unlöschbarkeit der Zeichen.” In Gedächtniskunst. Raum-Bild-Schrift. Studien zur Mnemotechnik, edited by Anselm Haverkamp and Renate Lachmann, 111–141. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp, 1991.
Ledanff, Susanne. “Kleist und die ‘beste aller Welten’. ‘Das Erdbeben in Chili’—gesehen im Spiegel der philosophischen und literarischen Stellungnahmen zur Theodizee im 18. Jahrhundert.” Kleist Jahrbuch (1986): 125–155.
Leibniz, G. W. and Samuel Clarke. Correspondence. Edited by Roger Ariev. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2000.
Quintilian, The Institutio Oratorio of Quintilian. Translated by H. E. Butler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
Samsonow, Elisabeth v. Fenster im Papier. Die Imaginäre Kollison der Schrift oder die Gedächtnis Revolution der Renaissance. Munich: Fink, 2001.
Yates, Frances. The Art of Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niebisch, A. (2009). Symbolic Space: Memory, Narrative, Writing. In: Backhaus, G., Murungi, J. (eds) Symbolic Landscapes. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8703-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8703-5_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8702-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8703-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)