Skip to main content

Defining Fuzzy Measures: A Comparative Study with Genetic and Gradient Descent Algorithms

  • Chapter
Intelligent Engineering Systems and Computational Cybernetics

Summary

Due to limitations of classical weighted average aggregation operators, there is an increase usage of fuzzy integrals, like the Sugeno and Choquet integrals, as alternative aggregation operators. However, their applicability has been threatened by the crux of determining the fuzzy measures in real problems. One way to determine these measures is by using learning data and optimizing the parameters. In this paper we made a comparative study of two well known optimization algorithms, Genetic Algorithm and Gradient Descent to determine fuzzy measures. Two illustrative cases are used to compare the algorithms and assess their performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Detyniecki M (2001) Fundamentals on aggregation operators. In: Proceedings AGOP', Asturias, Spain, July

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murofushi T, Sugeno M (1989) An interpretation of fuzzy measure and the Choquet integral as an integral with respect to a fuzzy measure. In: Fuzzy Sets and Systems 29:201–227

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Murofushi T, Sugeno M (2000) Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals. In: Fuzzy Measures and Integrals: Theory and Applications. Physica-Verlag:3–41

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grabisch M (1995) A new algorithm for identifying fuzzy measure and its application to pattern recognition. In: Proceedings of the 1995 4th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mendel JM (2001) Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Inference Systems: Introduction and New Directions. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grabisch M (1995) Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. In: Fuzzy Sets and Systems 69:279–298

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Grabisch M (1996) The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. In: European Journal of Operational Research 89:445–456

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Grabisch M (2003) Modeling data by the Choquet integral. In: Information Fusion in Data Mining. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Serra P, Ribeiro RA, Marques-Pereira R, Steel R, Niezette M, Donati A (2008) Fuzzy Thermal Alarm System for venus Express. In: Encyclopedia of Decision Making and Decision Support Technology, Editors: Frederic Adam and Patrick Humphreys. Publisher: Information Science Reference, Vol I: 391–401

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Z, Leung K, Wang J (1999) A genetic algorithm for determining nonadditive set functions in information fusion. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 102–103:436–469

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen T, Wang J (2001) Identification of ?-fuzzy measures using sampling design and genetic algorithms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 123–3:321–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Z, Leung Wong K, Wang J (2000) A new type of nonlinear and the computational algorithm. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 112–2:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J, Wang Z (1997) Using neural networks to determine Sugeno measures by statistics. Neural Networks 10–1:183–195

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang J, Wang Z (1996) Detecting constructions of nonlinear integral systems from input-output data: An application of neural network. In: Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Conference of the North America (Fuzzy Information Processing Society), NAF1PS'96, Berkeley, California, USA:559–563

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Z, Klir GJ (1991) Fuzzy Measure Theory. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murofushi T, Sugeno M (1991) A theory of fuzzy measures. Representation, the Choquet integral and null sets. Journal Mathematical Analysis Applications 159:532–549

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Marques Pereira R, Ribeiro RA, Serra P (2006) Rule correlation and Choquet integration in fuzzy inference systems. In: International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Choquet G (1953) Theory of capacities. Annals Institute Fourier 5:131–295

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajid H. Alavi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alavi, S.H., Jassbi, J., Serra, P.J.A., Ribeiro, R.A. (2009). Defining Fuzzy Measures: A Comparative Study with Genetic and Gradient Descent Algorithms. In: Machado, J.A.T., Pátkai, B., Rudas, I.J. (eds) Intelligent Engineering Systems and Computational Cybernetics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8678-6_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8678-6_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8677-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8678-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics