Leibniz’s Rationality: Divine Intelligibility and Human Intelligibility

  • Ohad Nachtomy
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity Of Science book series (LEUS, volume 13)

Keywords

Defend Acoustics Stake Piro 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R.M. 1974. Theories of Actuality. Noûs 8: 211–232. Reprinted in Michael J. Loux (ed.), 1979. The Possible and the Actual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 190–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beeley, P. 2003. Leibniz on the limits of human knowledge. With a critical edition of Sur la calculabilité du nombre de toutes les connaissances possibles and English translation. The Leibniz Review 13: 83–101.Google Scholar
  3. Couturat L. 1901. La Logique de Leibniz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  4. Dascal M. 2003. Ex pluribus unum? Patterns in 522+ texts of Leibniz’s Sömtliche Schriften und Briefe VI 4. The Leibniz Review 13: 105–154Google Scholar
  5. Dascal, M. 2004. Alter et etiam: Rejoinder to Schepers. The Leibniz Review 14: 153–167.Google Scholar
  6. Fichant, M. 1998. Science et métaphysique dans Descartes et Leibniz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  7. Fichant, M. 1998a. L’origine de la négation. In M. Fichant (1988), pp. 85–119.Google Scholar
  8. Leibniz, G.W. 2001. The Labyrinth of the Continuum. Writings on the Continuum Problem, 1672–1686. Ed. by R. Arthur. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Leibniz, G.W. 1982–1991. Vorausedition zur Reihe VI – Philosophische Schriften. Münster: Leibniz Forschungstelle der Universitöt Münster [=VE].Google Scholar
  10. Mercer, C. 2001. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nachtomy, O. 2005. Leibniz on the greatest number and the greatest being. The Leibniz Review 15: 49–66.Google Scholar
  12. Nachtomy, O. 2007. Possibility, Agency and Individuality in Leibniz’s Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Rauzy J.B. 1995. Quid sit Natura Prius? La conception leibnizienne de l’ordre. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 1: 31–48.Google Scholar
  14. Schepers H. 2004. Non Alter sed etiam Leibnitius: Reply to Dascal’s Review Ex pluribus unum? The Leibniz Review 14: 117–137.Google Scholar
  15. Schepers, H. This volume. Leibniz’s rationalism: A plea against equating soft and hard rationality.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ohad Nachtomy
    • 1
  1. 1.Bar-Ilan UniversityIsrael

Personalised recommendations