Complex Systems Thinking and Renewable Energy Systems

  • Mario Giampietro
  • Kozo Mayumi


This chapter is divided into three parts. Part 1 deals with theoretical issues reflecting systemic problems in energy analysis: (i) when dealing with complex dissipative systems no quantitative assessment of output/input energy ratio can be substantive; (ii) metabolic systems define “on their own”, what should be considered as useful work, converters, energy carriers, and primary energy sources; (iii) the well known trade-off between “power” (the pace of the throughput) and “efficiency” (the value of the output/input ratio). This makes it impossible to use just one number (an output/input ratio) for the analysis of complex metabolic systems. Part 2 introduces basic concepts related to Bioeconomics: (i) the rationale associated with the concept of EROI; (ii) the conceptual definition of a minimum threshold of energy throughput, determined by a combination of biophysical and socio-economic constraints. These two points entail that the energy sector of developed countries must be able to generate a huge net supply of energy carriers per hour of work and per ha of colonized land. Part 3 uses an integrated system of accounting (MuSIASEM approach) to check the viability of agro-biofuels. The “heart transplant” metaphor is proposed to check the feasibility and desirability of alternative energy sources using benchmark values: (i) what is expected according to societal characteristics; and (ii) what is supplied according to the energy system used to supply energy carriers. Finally, a section of conclusions tries to explain the widespread hoax of agro-biofuels in developed countries.


Biofuels bioeconomics complex systems alternative energy sources renewable energy systems multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM) EROI (Energy Return On Investment). 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, R.N. 1988. The Eighth Day: Social Evolution as the Self-Organization of Energy. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  2. Adriaanse, A., Bringezu, S., Hammond, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D., and Schütz, H. 1997. Resource Flows: The Material Basis of Industrial Economies. World Resources Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, R.U., Ayres, L.W., and Warr, B. 2003. Exergy, power and work in the US economy, 1900–1998. Energy 28(3), 219–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres, R.U. and Simonis, U.E. 1994. Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development. United Nations University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Ayres, R.U. and Warr, B. 2005. Accounting for growth: The role of physical work. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 16(2), 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batty, J.C., Hamad, S.N., and Keller, J., 1975. Energy inputs to irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Div. ASCE 101(IR4), 293–307.Google Scholar
  7. Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and Growth. Reinhold Publ. Co. New York, pp. 1023.Google Scholar
  8. Carnot, S. 1824. Reflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu sur les machines propres a developper cette puissance. Bachelier, libraire. Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Cleveland, C.J. 1992. Energy quality and energy surplus in the extraction of fossil fuels in the U.S. Ecological Economics 6, 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleveland, C.J., Costanza, R., Hall, C.A.S., and Kaufmann, R. 1984. Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective. Science 225(4665), 890–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleveland, C.J., Hall, C.A.S., and Herendeen, R.A. 2006. Letters – energy returns on ethanol production. Science 312, 1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cleveland, C.J., Kaufmann, R., and Stern, S.I. 2000. Aggregation and the role of energy in the economy. Ecological Economics 32, 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costanza, R. 1980. Embodied energy and economic valuation. Science 210, 1219–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costanza, R. and Herendeen, R. 1984. Embodied energy and economic value in the United States Economy: 1963, 1967 and 1972. Resources and Energy 6, 129–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cottrell, W.F. 1955. Energy and Society: The Relation between Energy, Social Change, and Economic Development. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Debeir, J.-C., Deleage, J.-P., and Hemery, D. 1991. In the Servitude of Power: Energy and Civilization through the Ages. Zed Books Ltd., Atlantic Highlands, NJ.Google Scholar
  17. De Carvalho Macedo I. 2005. Sugar Cane’s Energy: Twelve studies on Brazilian sugar cane agribusiness and its sustainability. UNICA – Sugar Cane Agroindustry Union – Berlendis Editores Ltda São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
  18. Dekkers, W.A., Lange, J.M., and de Wit, C.T. 1978. Energy production and use in Dutch agriculture. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22, 107–118.Google Scholar
  19. Duchin, F. 1998. Structural Economics: Measuring Change in Technology, Lifestyles, and the Environment. Island Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  20. FAO. 2001. Human Energy Requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation Rome 17-24 Ocrober 2001. FAO Food and Nutrition Technical Report SeriesGoogle Scholar
  21. Farrell, A.E., Plevin, R.J., Turner, B.T., Jones, A.D., O’Hare, M.O., and Kammen, D.M. 2006. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311, 506–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fischer-Kowalski, M. 1998. Societal Metabolism: The intellectual history of material flow analysis part I, 1860–1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(1), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fluck, R.C. 1981. Net Energy Sequestered in agricultural labor. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 24, 1449–1455.Google Scholar
  24. Fluck, R.C. 1992. Energy of Human Labor In: R.C. Fluck (Editor) Energy in Farm Production (Vol. 6 of Energy in World Agriculture) pp. 31–37 Elsevier Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  25. Fraser, R. and Kay, J.J., 2002. “Exergy Analysis of Eco-Systems: Establishing a Role for the Thermal Remote Sensing” In: D. Quattrochi and J. Luvall (Eds.), Thermal Remote sensing in Land Surface Processes, Taylor & Francis Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1975. Energy and economic myths. Southern Economic Journal 41, 347–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gever, J., Kaufmann, R., Skole, D., and Vörösmarty, C. 1991. Beyond Oil: The Threat to Food and Fuel in the Coming Decades. University Press of Colorado, Niwot.Google Scholar
  29. Giampietro, M. 1997a. Socioeconomic pressure, demographic pressure, environmental loading and technological changes in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 65, 201–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giampietro, M. 1997b Linking technology, natural resources, and the socioeconomic structure of human society: A theoretical model. In: L. Freese (Ed.), Advances in Human Ecology, Vol. 6. JAI Press, Greenwich (CT), pp. 75–130.Google Scholar
  31. Giampietro, M. (guest editor) 2000. Societal metabolism, part 1: Introduction of the analytical tool in theory, examples, and validation of basic assumptions. Population and Environment, special issue, 22(2), 97–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giampietro, M. (guest editor) 2001. Societal metabolism, part 2: Specific applications to case studies. Population and Environment, special issue, 22(3), 257–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Giampietro, M. 2003. Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca-Raton, FL. 437pp.Google Scholar
  34. Giampietro, M. 2006. Theoretical and practical considerations on the meaning and usefulness of traditional energy analysis Journal of Industrial Ecology 10(4). 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Giampietro, M. 2007a. Studying the “addiction to oil” of developed societies using the approach of Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal Metabolism (MSIASM) – In: F. Barbir and S. Ulgiati (editors) Sustainable Energy Production and Consumption and Environmental Costing – NATO Advanced Research Workshop – NATO Science for Peace and Security Series: C-Environmental Security Springer, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  36. Giampietro, M. 2007b. The future of agriculture: GMOs and the agonizing paradigm of industrial agriculture. In: S. Funtowicz and A. Guimaraes (Editors) Science for Policy Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Giampietro, M., Allen, T.F.H., and Mayumi, K. 2006b. The epistemological predicament associated with purposive quantitative analysis Ecological Complexity 3(4), 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Giampietro, M., Bukkens, S.G.F., and Pimentel, D. 1997a. Linking technology, natural resources, and the socioeconomic structure of human society: Examples and applications. In: L. Freese (Ed.), Advances in Human Ecology, Vol. 6. JAI Press, Greenwich (CT), pp. 131–200.Google Scholar
  39. Giampietro, M. and Mayumi, K. 2000a. Multiple-scale integrated assessment of societal metabolism: Introducing the approach. Population and Environment 22(2), 109–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Giampietro, M. and Mayumi, K. 2000b. Multiple-scales integrated assessments of societal metabolism: Integrating biophysical and economic representations across scales. Population and Environment 22(2), 155–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Giampietro, M. and Mayumi, K. 2004. Complex systems and energy. In: C. Cleveland, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Energy. Vol. 1, pp. 617–631. Elsevier, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  42. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., and Bukkens, S.G.F. 2001. Multiple-scale integrated assessment of societal metabolism: an analytical tool to study development and sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability 3(4), 275–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., and Munda, G. 2006a. Integrated assessment and energy analysis: Quality assurance in multi-criteria analysis of sustainability. Energy 31(1), 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., and Ramos-Martin, J. 2006c. Can biofuels replace fossil energy fuels? A multi-scale integrated analysis based on the concept of societal and ecosystem metabolism: Part 1. International Journal of Transdisciplinary Research 1(1), 51–87 [accessibile sul sito]Google Scholar
  45. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., and Ramos-Martin, J. 2007. How serious is the addiction to oil of developed society? A multi-scale integrated analysis based on the concept of societal and ecosystem metabolism International Journal of Transdisciplinary Research 2(1), 42–92 – available on line at: www.ijtr.orgGoogle Scholar
  46. Giampietro, M., Pastore, G., and Ulgiati, S. 1998. Italian agriculture and concepts of sustainability. In: E. Ortega and P. Safonov (Eds.), Introduction to Ecological Planning Using Emergy Analysis with Brazilian Case Studies. LEIA-FEA Unicamp, Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
  47. Giampietro, M. and Pimentel, D. 1990. Assessment of the energetics of human labor. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 32, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Giampietro, M. and Ramos-Martin, J. 2005. Multi-scale integrated analysis of sustainability: a methodological tool to improve the quality of the narratives. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 5(3/4), 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Giampietro, M. and Ulgiati, S. 2005. An integrated assessment of large-scale biofuel production. Critical Review in Plant Sciences 24, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Giampietro, M., Ulgiati, S., and Pimentel, D. 1997b. Feasibility of large-scale biofuel production: Does an enlargement of scale change the picture? BioScience 47(9), 587–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gilliland, M.W., Ed., 1978. Energy Analysis: A New Policy Tool. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  52. Hagens, N., Costanza, R., Mulder, K. 2006. Letters – Energy Returns on Ethanol Production. Science 312, 1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hall, C.A.S.; Cleveland, C.J.; and Kaufman, R. 1986. Energy and Resource Quality. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  54. Herendeen, R.A. 1981. Energy intensities in economic and ecological systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology 91, 607–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Herendeen, R.A. 1998. Ecological numeracy: quantitative analysis of environmental issues John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  56. Hudson, J.C., 1975. Sugarcane: its energy relationship with fossil fuel. Span 18, 12–14.Google Scholar
  57. IFIAS (International Federation of Institutes for Advanced Study), 1974. Energy Analysis. International Federation of Institutes for Advanced Study, Workshop on Methodology and Conventions – Report No. 6. IFIAS, Stockholm, p. 89.Google Scholar
  58. Jevons, W.S., [1865] 1965. The Coal Question: an inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines. A. W. Flux (Ed.), 3rd ed. rev. Augustus M. Kelley, New York.Google Scholar
  59. Jorgenson, D.W. 1988. Productivity and economic growth in Japan and the United States. The American Economic Review 78(2), 217–222.Google Scholar
  60. Kaufmann, R.K. 1992. A biophysical analysis of the energy/real GDP ratio: implications for substitution and technical change. Ecological Economics 6, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kaufmann, R.K. 2006. Letters – energy returns on ethanol production. Science 312, 1747.Google Scholar
  62. Kay, J. 2000. ‘Ecosystems as self-organizing holarchic open systems: narratives and the second law of thermodynamics’, In: S.E. Jorgensen and F. Muller (Eds.), Handbook of Ecosystems Theories and Management, London: Lewis Publishers, pp. 135–160Google Scholar
  63. Leach, G. 1976. Energy and Food Production. I.P.C. Science and Technology Press limited, Surrey, U.K.Google Scholar
  64. Lotka, A.J. 1922. Contribution to the energetics of evolution. Proceedings Natural Academy Science 8, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lotka, A.J. 1956. Elements of Mathematical Biology. Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  66. Martinez-Alier, J. 1987. Ecological Economics. Energy, Environment and Society. Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  67. Matthews, E., Amann, C., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Bringezu, S., Hüttler, W., Kleijn, R., Moriguchi, Y., Ottke, C., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D., Schandl, H., Schütz, H., van der Voet, E., and Weisz, H. 2000. The Weight of Nations: Material Outflows from Industrial Economies. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  68. Mayumi, K. 1991. Temporary emancipation from land: from the industrial revolution to the present time. Ecological Economics 4, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mayumi, K. 2001. The Origin of Ecological Economics: The Bioeconomics of Georgescu-Roegen. Routledge, London, UK.Google Scholar
  70. Mayumi, K. and Giampietro, M. 2004. Entropy in ecological economics. In: J. Proops and P. Safonov (Eds.), Modeling in Ecological Economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK), pp. 80–101.Google Scholar
  71. Mayumi, K. and Giampietro M. 2006. The epistemological challenge of self-modifying systems: Governance and sustainability in the post-normal science era Ecological Economics 57, 382–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Morowitz, H.J. 1979. Energy Flow in Biology. Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge, CT.Google Scholar
  73. Norman, M.J.T. 1978. Energy inputs and outputs of subsistence cropping systems in the tropics. Agro-Ecosystems 4, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Odum, H.T. 1971. Environment, Power, and Society. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
  75. Odum, H.T. 1983. Systems Ecology. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  76. Odum, H.T. 1996. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  77. Odum, H.T. and Pinkerton, R.C. 1955. Time’s speed regulator: the optimum efficiency for maximum power output in physical and biological systems. American Scientist 43, 331–343.Google Scholar
  78. Ostwald, W. 1907. The modern theory of energetics. The Monist 17, 481–515.Google Scholar
  79. Patzek, T. 2004. Thermodynamics of the corn-ethanol biofuel cycle. Critical Review Plant Sciences 23(6), 519–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Patzek, T.W. 2006. Letters – Energy Returns on Ethanol Production. Science 312, 1747.Google Scholar
  81. Patzek, T.W. and Pimentel, D. 2005. Thermodynamics of Energy Production from Biomass. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24(5–6), 327–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pimentel, D., Patzek T., and Cecil G. 2007. Ethanol production: Energy, Economic, and Environmental losses. Reviews of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology 189, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pimentel, D. and Pimentel, M. 1979. Food Energy and Society. Edward Arnold Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  84. Pimentel, D. and Pimentel, M. 1996. Food, Energy and Society (revised edition) University Press of Colorado, Niwot Co.Google Scholar
  85. Podolinsky, S. 1883. Menschliche arbeit und einheit der kraft. Die Neue Zeit (Stuttgart, IHW Dietz), p. 413. (In German).Google Scholar
  86. Prigogine, I. 1978. From Being to Becoming. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  87. Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. 1981. Order out of Chaos. Bantam Books, New York.Google Scholar
  88. Ramos-Martin, J., Giampietro, M., and Mayumi, K. 2007. On China’s exosomatic energy metabolism: an application of multi-scale integrated analysis of societal metabolism (MSIASM). Ecological Economics 63(1), 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Revelle, R., 1976. Energy use in rural India. Science 192, 969–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rosen, R. 1958. The representation of biological systems from the standpoint of the theory of categories. Bullettin of Mathematical Biophysics 20, 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schneider, E.D. and Kay, J.J. 1994. “Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics”. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 19, 25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schneider, E.D. and Kay, J.J. 1995. “Order from Disorder: The Thermodynamics of Complexity in Biology”, In: Michael P. Murphy, Luke A.J. O’Neill (Eds.), What is Life:The Next Fifty Years. Reflections on the Future of Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 161–172.Google Scholar
  93. Schrödinger, E. 1967. What is Life & Mind and Matter. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  94. Slesser, M. 1978. Energy in the Economy. MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  95. Slesser, M. and King, J. 2003. Not by Money Alone: Economics as Nature Intended Jon Carpenter Publishing, Charlbury, Oxon.Google Scholar
  96. Rappaport, R.A. 1971. The flow of energy in an agricultural society. Scientific American 224, 117–133.Google Scholar
  97. Shapouri, H., Duffield, J., and Wang, M. 2002. The Energy Balance of Corn-Ethanol: An Update. Report 813. USDA Office of Energy Policy and New Uses, Agricultural Economics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  98. Smil, V. 1983. Biomass Energies Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  99. Smil, V. 1988. Energy in China’s Modernization. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.Google Scholar
  100. Smil, V. 1991. General Energetics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  101. Smil, V. 2001. Enriching the Earth. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  102. Smil, V. 2003. Energy at the crossroads: Global Perspectives and Uncertainties. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  103. Tainter, J.A. 1988. The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  104. Ulanowicz, R.E. 1986. Growth and Development: Ecosystem Phenomenology. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  105. Ulgiati, S., Brown, M., Giampietro, M., Herendeen, R., and Mayumi, K. (Eds.) 1998. Proceedings of the Biennial International Workshop Advances in Energy Studies (1): Energy flows in Ecology and Economy. Porto Venere, Italy 26–30 May 1998 – MUSIS (Museum of Science and Scientific Information), Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  106. USDA 2005a. 281&page=1Google Scholar
  107. USDA 2005b. USDA 2006 (Table 1–45).Google Scholar
  108. Watt, K. 1989. Evidence of the role of energy resources in producing long waves in the US economy. Ecological Economics 1, 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. White, L.A. 1943. Energy and evolution of culture. American Anthropologist 14, 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. White, L.A. 1959. The Evolution of Culture: The Development of Civilization to the Fall of Rome. Mac Graw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  111. Williams, D.W., McCarty, T.R., Gunkel, W.W., Price, D.R., and Jewell, W.J., 1975. Energy utilization on beef feed lots and dairy farms. In: W.J. Jewell, (ed.), Energy, Agriculture and Waste Management. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
  112. Zemmelink G. 1995. Allocation and Utilization of Resources at the Farm Level In: A Reseacrh Approach to Livestock Production from a Systems Perspective – Proceedings of the Symposium “A farewell to Prof. Dick Zwart” – Dept. of Animal Production Systems – Wageningen Agricultural University, pp 35–48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Giampietro
    • 1
  • Kozo Mayumi
    • 2
  1. 1.ICREA Research ProfessorInstitute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA) Autonomous University of BarcelonaCampus of Bellaterra 08193Spain
  2. 2.Faculty of IASThe University of Tokushima Minami-Josanjima 1–1Japan

Personalised recommendations