Advertisement

Ecological and Psychological Value of Urban Green Space

Chapter
Part of the Future City book series (FUCI, volume 2)

Abstract

In urban environments, perhaps more so than in any other setting, people and nature must coexist in close, and sometimes uncomfortable, proximity. With half of the world’s human population living in cities and a continued decline of biodiversity in the wider landscape, urban nature plays an increasingly important role in creating cities that are both ecologically and socially sustainable. However, understanding the value of urban green spaces as a resource requires an integration of several, rarely overlapping, approaches to evaluating and managing these places.

Keywords

Green Space Urban Landscape Impervious Surface Urban Green Space Bird Species Richness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for generous assistance, discussion and/or comments from P. Armsworth, K. Baker, C. Bernardini, S. Herbert, P. Johnson, K. Kirwan, G. Mill, J. Vulliamy, R. Wall, and S. Warber, as well as to all the participants who gave of their time. Ordnance Survey kindly provided MasterMap data under license to the CityForm consortium. K.J.G. holds a Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award.

References

  1. ARCWIS (2002) Perth Domestic Water-use Study: Household Appliance Ownership and Community Attitudinal Analysis 1999–2000, Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, CSIRO, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  2. Balram, S. and Dragicevic, S. (2005) Attitudes toward urban green spaces: integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques to improve attitude measurements. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(2-4), pp. 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbosa, O., Tratalos, J.A., Armsworth, P.R., Davies, R.G., Fuller, R.A., Johnson, P. and Gaston, K.J. (2007) Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(2-3), pp. 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastin, L. and Thomas, C.D. (1999) The distribution of plant species in urban vegetation fragments. Landscape Ecology, 14(5), pp. 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beer, A. (2005) The green structure of Sheffield. In Green structure and urban planning. Final report of COST Action C1, (eds. A.C. Werquin, B. Duhem, G. Lindholm, B. Oppermann, S. Pauleit and S. Tjallingii), COST Programme, Brussels.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, S., Morris, N., Findlay, C., Travlou, P., Gooch, D. Gregory, G. and Ward Thompson, C. (2004) Nature for People: The Importance of Green Spaces to East Midlands Communities, English Nature Research Report No. 567. English Nature, Peterborough.Google Scholar
  7. Bernardini, C. and Irvine, K.N. (2007) The ‘nature’ of urban sustainability: Private or public greenspaces? Sustainable Development and Planning III, 102, pp. 661–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhatti, M. and Church, A. (2001) Cultivating natures: Homes and gardens in late modernity. Sociology, 35(2), pp. 365–383.Google Scholar
  9. Bhatti, M. and Church, A. (2004) Home, the culture of nature and meanings of gardens in late modernity. Housing Studies, 19(1), pp. 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bixler, R.D. and Floyd, M.F. (1997) Nature is scary, disgusting and uncomfortable. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), pp. 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bjerke, R., Østdahla, T., Thraneb, C. and Trumseb, E. (2006) Vegetation density in urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 5(1), pp. 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, C. and Grant, M. (2005) Biodiversity and human health: What role for nature in healthy urban planning? Built Environment, 31(4), pp. 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burgess, J. (1998) But is it worth taking the risk? How women negotiate access to urban woodland: A case study. In New Frontiers of Space, Bodies and Gender, (ed. R. Ainley), Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  14. Burgess, J., Harrison, D.M. and Limb, M. (1988) People, parks and the urban green: A study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Studies, 25(6), pp. 455–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Catanzaro, C. and Ekanem, E. (2004) Home gardeners value stress reduction and interaction with nature. Acta Horticulturae, 639, pp. 269–275.Google Scholar
  16. Chace, J.F. and Walsh, J.J. (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74(1), pp. 46–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chamberlain, D.E., Cannon, A.R. and Toms, M.P. (2004) Associations of garden birds with gradients in garden habitat and local habitat. Ecography, 27(5), pp. 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chamberlain, D.E., Gough, S., Vaughan, H., Vickery, J.A. and Appleton, G.F. (2007) Determinants of bird species richness in public green spaces. Bird Study, 54(1), pp. 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chiesura, A. (2004) The role of parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), pp. 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clergeau, P., Sauvage, A., Lemoine, A., Marchand, J.-P., Dubs, F. and Mennechez, G. (1997) Quels oiseaux dans la ville? Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine, 74, pp. 119–130.Google Scholar
  21. Clergeau, P., Jokimäki, J. and Savard, J.-P. L. (2001) Are urban bird communities influenced by the bird diversity of adjacent landscapes? Journal of Applied Ecology, 38(5), pp. 1122–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coley, R.L., Sullivan, W.C. and Kuo, F.E. (1997) Where does community grow?: The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), pp. 468–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Collins, J.P., Kinzig, A., Grimm, N.B., Fagan, W.F., Hope, D., Wu, J. and Borer, E.T. (2000) A new urban ecology. American Scientist, 88(5), pp. 416–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Commission for Architecture and Built Environment (CABE) (2005) Does Money Grow on Trees? Commission for Architecture and Built Environment, London.Google Scholar
  25. Commission for Architecture and Built Environment (CABE) (2007) Decent parks? Decent behaviour? The Link Between the Quality of Parks and User Behaviour. Commission for Architecture and Built Environment, London.Google Scholar
  26. Conway, H. (2000) Parks and people: The social functions. In The Regulation of Public Parks, (eds. J. Woodstra and K. Fieldhouse), E. and F.N. Spon, London.Google Scholar
  27. Cornelis, J. and Hermy, M. (2004) Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), pp. 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. de Groot, W.T. and van den Born, R.J.G. (2003) Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: An exploration in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(3), pp. 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. de Vries, S., Verheij, R.A., Groenewegen, P.P. and Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003) Natural environments–healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35(10), pp. 1717–1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2002) Working with the Grain of Nature. Defra Publications, London.Google Scholar
  31. Dickman, C.R. (1987) Habitat fragmentation and vertebrate species richness in an urban environment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(2), pp. 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dines, N., Cattell, F., Gesler, W. and Curtis, S. (2006) Public Spaces, Social Relations and Well-being in East London, The Policy Press, Bristol.Google Scholar
  33. Donnelly, R. and Marzluff, J.M. (2006) Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosystems, 9(2), pp. 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dunnett, N., Swanwick, C. and Woolley, H. (2002) Improving Urban Parks, Play Areas and Green Spaces, Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Fernández-Juricic, E. (2000) Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conservation Biology, 14(2), pp. 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fernández-Juricic, E. (2001) Avian spatial segregation at edges and interiors of urban parks in Madrid, Spain. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10(8), pp. 1303–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fernández-Juricic, E., Poston, R., de Collibus, K., Morgan, T., Bastain, B., Martin, C., Jones, K. and Tremino, R. (2005) Microhabitat selection and singing behavior patterns of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) in urban parks in a heavily urbanized landscape in the western U.S. Urban Habitats, 3, pp. 49–69.Google Scholar
  38. Forsyth, A. (2003) People and urban green areas: perceptions and use. Design Brief Number 4, University of Minnesota, Design Centre for American Urban Landscapes, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  39. Francis, M. (1988) The garden in the mind and in the heart. In Looking Back to the Future, (eds. H. van Hoorgdalem, N.L. Prack, Th.J.M. van der Voordt and H.B.R. van Wegen), IAPS 10/1988 Proceedings, Vol. 2. Delft University Press, Delft.Google Scholar
  40. Freeman, H.L. and Stansfield, S.A. (1998) Psychosocial effects of urban environments, noise and crowding. In Environment and Mental Health, (ed. A. Lundberg). Lawrence Erlbaum, London.Google Scholar
  41. Fuller, R.A., Irvine, K.N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P.H. and Gaston, K.J. (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3(4), pp. 390–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fuller, R.A., Warren, P.H., Armsworth, P.R., Barbosa, O. and Gaston, K.J. (2008) Garden bird feeding predicts the structure of urban avian assemblages. Diversity and Distributions, 14(1), pp. 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fuller, R.A., Irvine, K.N., Davies, Z.G., Armsworth, P.R. and Gaston, K.J. (in press) Interactions between people and birds in urban landscapes. Studies in Avian Biology.Google Scholar
  44. Fuller, R.A., Tratalos, J. & Gaston, K.J. (2009) How many birds are there in a city of half a million people? Diversity and Distributions, 15(2), pp. 328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Garden, J., McAlpine, C., Peterson, A., Jones, D. and Possingham, H.P. (2006) Review of the ecology of Australian urban fauna: A focus on spatially explicit processes. Austral Ecology, 31(2), pp. 126–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Garvin, A. and Berens, G. (1997) Urban Parks and Open Space, Urban Land Institute, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  47. Gaston, K.J., Warren, P.H., Thompson, K. and Smith, R.M. (2005) Urban domestic gardens (IV): The extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(14), pp. 3327–2249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gaston, K.J., Fuller, R.A., Loram, A., MacDonald, C., Power, S. and Dempsey, N. (2007) Urban domestic gardens (XI): Variation in urban wildlife gardening in the United Kingdom. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(11), pp. 3227–3238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gerlach-Spriggs, N., Kaufman, R.E. and Warner, S.B. Jr. (1998) Restorative Gardens: The Healing Landscape, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  50. Gibb, H. and Hochuli, D.F. (2002) Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: Large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages. Biological Conservation, 106(1), pp. 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Glue, D. (2006) Variety at winter bird tables. Bird Populations, 7, pp. 212–215.Google Scholar
  52. Gomez, F. and Salvador, P. (2006) A proposal for green planning in cities. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(1), pp. 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hadidian, J., Sauer, J., Swarth, C., Hanly, P., Droege, S., Williams, C., Huff, J. and Didden, G. (1997) A citywide breeding bird survey for Washington, D.C. Urban Ecosystems, 1(2), pp. 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hayward, G. and Weitzer, W.H. (1984) The public’s image of urban parks. Urban Ecology, 8, pp. 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Herzog, T.R., Black, A.M., Fountaine, K.A. and Knotts, D.J. (1997) Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(2), pp. 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Herzog, T.R. and Miller, E.J. (1998) The role of mystery in perceived danger and environmental preference. Environment and Behavior, 30(4), pp. 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Herzog, T.R., Herbert, E.J., Kaplan, R. and Crooks, C.L. (2000) Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences. Environment and Behavior, 32(3), pp. 323–337.Google Scholar
  58. Hope, D., Gries, C., Zhu, W., Fagan, W.F., Redman, C.L., Grimm, N.B., Nelson, A.L., Martin, C. and Kinzig, A. (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), pp. 8788–8792.Google Scholar
  59. Hull, R.B. and Michael, S.E. (1995) Nature-based recreation, mood change, and stress restoration. Leisure Sciences, 17(1), pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hunt, R., Falce, C., Crombie, H., Morton, S. and Walton, E. (2000) Health update – Environment and Health: Air Pollution, Health Education Authority, London.Google Scholar
  61. Hunziker, M., Buchecker, M. and Hartig, T. (2007) Space and place – Two aspects of the human-landscape relationship. In A Changing World: Challenges for Landscape Research, (eds. F. Kienast, O. Wildi and S. Ghosh). Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  62. Irvine, K.N. and Kaplan, S. (2001) Coping with change: The small experiment as a strategic approach to environmental sustainability. Environmental Management, 28(6), pp. 713–725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Irvine, K.N. and Warber, S.L. (2002) Greening healthcare: Practicing as if the natural environment really mattered. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 8(5), pp. 76–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Irvine, K.N., Devine-Wright, P., Payne, S.R., Fuller, R.A. Krausse, B. and Gaston, K.J. (2009) Green space, soundscape and urban sustainability: An interdisciplinary, empirical study. Local Environment, 14(2), pp. 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jim, C.Y. and Chen, W.Y. (2006) Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4), pp. 422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jokimäki, J. and Suhonen, J. (1993) Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: A biogeographical comparison. Ornis Fennica, 70(2), pp. 71–77.Google Scholar
  67. Kaplan, R. (1973) Some psychological benefits of gardening. Environment and Behavior, 5(2), pp. 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kaplan, R. (1985) Nature at the doorstep: Residential satisfaction and the nearby environment. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2(2), pp. 115–127.Google Scholar
  69. Kaplan, R. (2001) The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), pp. 507–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S. (1989) The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  71. Kellett, J.E. (1982) The private garden in England and Wales. Landscape Planning, 9(2), pp. 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kim, J. and Kaplan, R. (2004) Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New Urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment and Behavior, 36(3), pp. 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kinzig, A., Warren, P., Martin, C., Hope, D. and Katti, M. (2005) The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecology and Society, 10(1), p.23.Google Scholar
  74. Kuo, F.E. (2001) Coping with poverty: Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), pp. 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kuo, F.E. and Sullivan, W.C. (2001a) Environment and crime in the inner city. Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33(3), pp. 343–367.Google Scholar
  76. Kuo, F.E. and Sullivan, W.C. (2001b) Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), pp. 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kuo, F.E. and Taylor, A.F. (2004) A potential natural treatment for Attention-Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), pp. 1580–1586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lepczyk, C.A., Mertig, A.G. and Liu, J. (2004) Assessing landowner activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes. Environmental Management, 33(1), pp. 110–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Loram, A., Tratalos, J., Warren, P.H. and Gaston, K.J. (2007) Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landscape Ecology, 22(4), pp. 601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Maas, J., Verheij, R.A., Groenewegen, P.P. and de Vries, S. (2006) Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(7), pp. 587–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. MacDougall, E.B. (ed.) (1980) John Claudius Loudon and the early Nineteenth Century in Great Britain, Dumbarton Oaks Trustees for Harvard University, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  82. Macintyre, S., Ellaway, A., Hiscock, R., Kearns, A., Der, G. and McKay, L. (2003) What features of the home and the area might help to explain observed relationships between housing tenure and health? Evidence from the west of Scotland. Health and Place, 9(3), pp. 207–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Martin, C.A., Warren, P.S. and Kinzig, A.P. (2004) Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), pp. 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Matlack, G.R. (1993) Sociological edge effects: Spatial distribution of human impact in suburban forest fragments. Environmental Management, 17(6), pp. 829–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. McKinney, M.L. (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience, 52(10), pp. 883–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. McKinney, M.L. (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, 11(2), pp. 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. McMichael, T. (2001) Human Frontiers, Environments and Disease: Past Patterns, Uncertain Futures, University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  88. Melles, S., Glenn, S. and Martin, K. (2003) Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conservation Ecology, 7(1), p.5.Google Scholar
  89. Merrill, S.B. (2004) The role of open space in urban planning. Conservation Biology, 18(2), p.294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Moran, M.A. (1984) Influence of adjacent land use on understory vegetation of New York forests. Urban Ecology, 8(4), pp. 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Mörtberg, U. and Wallentinus, H.-G. (2000) Red-listed forest bird species in an urban environment—assessment of green space corridors. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50(4), pp. 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Nasar, J. L., Fisher, B., and Grannis, M. (1993) Proximate physical cues to fear of crime. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26(1-4), pp. 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Nasar, J. L. and Jones, K. M. (1997) Landscapes of fear and stress. Environment and Behavior, 29(3), pp. 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Nassauer, J.I. (1995) Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal, 14(2), pp. 161–170.Google Scholar
  95. Nassauer, J.I. (2004) Monitoring the success of metropolitan wetland restorations: Cultural sustainability and ecological function. Wetlands, 24(4), pp. 756–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Niemelä, J. (1999) Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8(1), pp. 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2002) Living places: Cleaner, Safer, Greener, The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
  98. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2006) Enhancing Urban Green Space, The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
  99. Özgüner, H. and Kendle, A.D. (2006) Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK). Landscape and Urban Planning, 74(2), pp. 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Park, C.R. and Lee, W.S. (2000) Relationship between species composition and area in breeding birds of urban woods in Seoul, Korea. Landscape and Urban Planning, 51(1), pp. 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Parsons, R., Tassinary, L.G., Ulrich, R.S., Hebl, M.R. and Grossman-Alexander, M. (1998) The view from the road: Implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(2), pp. 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Pauleit, S., Ennos, R. and Golding, Y. (2005) Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change – a study in Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(2-4), pp. 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Payne, S.R., Devine-Wright, P. and Irvine, K.N. (2007) Peoples’ perception and classification of sounds heard in urban parks: semantics, affect and restoration. Presentation at the 36th International Congress on Noise Control Engineering (Inter-Noise 2007), Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  104. Pincetl, S. and Gearin, E. (2005) The reinvention of public green space. Urban Geography, 26(5), pp. 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rebele, F. (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 4(6), pp. 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rohde, C.L.E. and Kendle, A.D. (1997) Human well being, natural landscapes and wildlife in urban areas, English Nature Science Report no. 22. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.Google Scholar
  107. Rollinson, D.J., O'Leary, R. and Jones, D.N. (2003) The practice of wildlife feeding in suburban Brisbane. Corella, 27(2), pp. 52–58.Google Scholar
  108. Royal Horticultural Society (2006) Front Gardens: Are we Parking on our Gardens? Do driveways Cause Flooding? Royal Horticultural Society, Woking, UK.Google Scholar
  109. Ryan, R. (2005) Exploring the effects of environmental experience on attachment to urban natural areas. Environment and Behavior, 37(1), pp. 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schroeder, J.W. and Anderson, L.M. (1984) Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research, 16(2), pp. 178–194.Google Scholar
  111. Shibata, S. and Suzuki, N. (2002) Effects of the foliage plant on task performance and mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(3), pp. 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sime, J. (1993) What makes a house a home: the garden? In Housing: Design, Research, Education, (eds. M. Bulos and N. Teymur), Avebury, Aldershot, UK.Google Scholar
  113. Smith, R.M., Gaston, K.J., Warren, P.H. and Thompson, K. (2005) Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape. Landscape Ecology, 20(2), pp. 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Smith, R.M., Warren, P.H., Thompson, K. and Gaston, K.J. (2006a) Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15(8), pp. 2415–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Smith, R.M., Gaston, K.J., Warren, P.H. and Thompson, K. (2006b) Urban domestic gardens (VIII): environmental correlates of invertebrate abundance. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15(8), pp. 2515–2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sorace, A. (2001) Value to wildlife of urban-agricultural parks: A case study from Rome urban area. Environmental Management, 28(4), pp. 547–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Speirs, L.J. (2003) Sustainable planning: the value of green space. Sustainable Planning And Development, 6, pp. 337–346.Google Scholar
  118. Stanners, D. and Bourdeau, P. (1995) The Urban Environment. In Europe’s Environment: The Dobříš Assessment, (eds. D. Stanners and P. Bourdeau), European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  119. Stigsdotter, U.A. and Grahn, P. (2004) A garden at your doorstep may reduce stress – Private gardens as restorative environments in the city. Proceedings of the Open Space-People Space Conference, 27–29th October 2004, Edinburgh, Scotland. Paper 00015.Google Scholar
  120. Takano, T., Nakamura, K., and Watanabe, M. (2002) Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas. The importance of walkable green spaces. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(12), pp. 913–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Taylor, A.F., Kuo, F.E. and Sullivan, W.C. (2002) Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1-2), pp. 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Thwaites, K., Helleur, E. and Simkins, I. M. (2005) Restorative urban open space: Exploring the spatial configuration of human emotional fulfilment in urban open space. Landscape Research, 30(4), pp. 525–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Tratalos, J., Fuller, R.A., Warren, P.H., Davies, R.G. and Gaston, K.J. (2007a) Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(4), pp. 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Tratalos, J., Fuller, R.A., Evans, K.L., Davies, R.G., Newson, S.E., Greenwood, J.J.D. and Gaston, K.J. (2007b) Bird densities are associated with household densities. Global Change Biology, 13(8), pp. 1685–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Ulrich, R.S. (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), pp. 420–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Ulrich, R.S. and Addoms, D.L. (1981) Psychological and recreational benefits of a residential park. Journal of Leisure Research, 13(1), pp. 43–65.Google Scholar
  127. Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A. and Zelson, M. (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), pp. 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (2001) National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife Associated Recreation, United States Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  129. Verheij, R.A. (1995) Explaining urban-rural variations in health: a review of interactions between individual and environment. Social Science and Medicine, 42(6), pp. 923–935.Google Scholar
  130. Ward Thompson, C. (2002) Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(2), pp. 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wells, N.M. (2002) At home with nature: the effects of nearby nature on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), pp. 775–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Wray, S., Hay, J., Walker, H. and Staff, R. (2005) Audit of the Towns, Cities and Development Workstream of the England Biodiversity Strategy, English Nature research report number 652. English Nature, Peterborough.Google Scholar
  133. Yang, W. and Kang, J. (2005) Soundscape and sound preferences in urban squares: A case study in Sheffield. Journal of Urban Design, 10(1), pp. 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development, De Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK
  2. 2.The Ecology CentreUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.formerly Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  4. 4.at the School of Environment and Development and Manchester School of ArchitectureManchester UniversityManchesterUK
  5. 5.Dr Foster Research; formerly Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  6. 6.Manchester Architecture Research Centre, School of Environment and DevelopmentUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  7. 7.formerly Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  8. 8.Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  9. 9.Department of Civil and Building EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
  10. 10.Institute of Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK
  11. 11.Biodiversity & Macroecology Group, Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations