Earthquake Early Warning: Real-time Prediction of Ground Motion from the First Seconds of Seismic Recordings

  • Maren Böse
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 7)


Ground Motion Seismic Wave Early Warning System Seismological Society North Anatolian Fault 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen R, Kanamori H (2003) The potential for earthquake early warning in southern California. Science 300:786–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambraseys N (2002) The seismic activity of the Marmara Sea region over the last 2000 years. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 92(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1997) Modelling finite-fault radiation from the ωn spectrum. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 87(1):67–84Google Scholar
  4. Beresnev I, Atkinson G (1998) FINSIM – a FORTRAN program for simulating stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults. Seismological Research Letters 69(1):27–32Google Scholar
  5. Bishop C (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Böse M (2006) Earthquake Early Warning for Istanbul using Artificial Neural Networks, PhD thesis, Karlsruhe University, Germany, Nov. 10, 181p. (
  7. Böse M, Ionescu C, Wenzel F (2007) Earthquake early warning for Bucharest, Romania: Novel and revised scaling relations. Geophysical Research Letters 34:1–6, L07302, doi:10.1029/2007GL029396Google Scholar
  8. Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 73:1865–1894Google Scholar
  9. Boore DM, Joyner WB (1997) Site amplifications for generic rock studies. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 87(2):327–341Google Scholar
  10. Cua G, Heaton T (2003) An envelope-based paradigm for seismic early warning. Eos. Trans. AGU, Fall Meet. Suppl. 84(46). Abstract S42B-0164Google Scholar
  11. Espinosa-Aranda J, Jimenez A, Ibarrola G, Alcantar F, Aguilar A, Inostroza M, Maldonado S (1995) Mexico City Seismic Alert System. Seismological Research Letters 66(6):42–53Google Scholar
  12. Erdik M, Aydinoglu N, Fahjan Y, Sesetyan K, Demircioglu M, Siyahi B, Durukal E, Özbey C, Biro Y, Akman H, Yuzugullu O (2003a) Earthquake risk assessment for Istanbul metropolitan area. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erdik M, Fahjan Y, Özel O, Alcik H, Mert A, Gul M (2003b) Istanbul Earthquake Rapid Response and the Early Warning System. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 157–163Google Scholar
  14. Goltz JD (2002) Introducing earthquake early warning in California: A summary of social science and public policy issues. Caltech Seismological Laboratory, Disaster Assistance Division, A report to OES and the Operational AreasGoogle Scholar
  15. Horasan G, Kaslilar-Özcan A, Boztepe-Güney A, Türkelli N (1998) S-wave attenuation in the Marmara region, northwestern Turkey. Geophysical Research Letters 25(14):2733–2736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horiuchi S, Negishi H, Abe K, Kamimura A, Fujinawa Y (2005) An automatic processing system for broadcasting earthquake alarms. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 95(2):708–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanamori H (2005) Real-time seismology and earthquake damage mitigation. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Sciences 33:5.1–5.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lockman A, Allen R (2005) Single-station earthquake characterization for early warning. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 95(6):2029–2039, doi: 10.1785/0120040241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakamura Y (1989) Earthquake alarm system for Japan Railways. Japanese Railway Engineering, 28(4):3–7Google Scholar
  20. Olson E, Allen R (2005) The deteministic nature of earthquake rupture. Nature Letters 438(10):212–215, doi:10.1038/nature04214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parsons T (2004) Recalculated probability of M ≥ 7 earthquakes beneath the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Journal of Geophysical Research 109:B05304, doi:10.1029/2003JB002667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pulido N, Ojeda A, Atakan K, Kubo T (2004) Strong ground motion estimation in the Marmara Sea Region (Turkey) based on a scenario earthquake. Tectonophysics 391:357–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rydelek P, Horiuchi S (2006) Is the earthquake rupture deterministic? Brief communications arising from: EL Olson and RM Allen, Nature, 441, doi:10.1038/nature04963, 8 June 2006Google Scholar
  24. Rydelek P, Pujol J (2004) Real-time seismic warning with a 2-station subarray. Bull Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 94:1546–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wenzel F, Oncescu M, Baur M, Fiedrich F (1999) An early warning system for Bucharest. Seismological Research Letters 70(2):161–169Google Scholar
  26. Wu Y-M, Kanamori H (2005a) Experiment on an onsite early warning method for the Taiwan early warning system. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 95:347–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu Y-M, Kanamori H (2005b) Rapid assessment of damaging potential of earthquakes in Taiwan from the beginning of P waves. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 95:1181–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu Y-M, Teng T-l (2002) A virtual subnetwork approach to earthquake early warning. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 92(5):2008–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maren Böse
    • 1
  1. 1.Geophysical Institute at Karlsruhe UniversityHertzstrasse 16Germany

Personalised recommendations