Skip to main content

Abstract

Digital Soil Mapping to capture or determine categorical or property information has undergone a tremendous increase in capability and application during the past decade. Many successful technologies have been developed through research activities worldwide, including generalized linear models, classification and regression trees, neural networks, fuzzy systems, expert systems, and geostatistical methods and applications. These technologies have matured beyond a research activity and have potential for use by soil scientists to more accurately, consistently, and efficiently define soil categories and soil properties based on digital proxies to soil-forming factors. These applications for producing soil maps are now poised to become production tools to either update older soil survey information or to produce soil information on previously unmapped areas.

As these technologies move into the mainstream for producing soil survey information, there are challenges that must be overcome. The community of soil scientists and soil classifiers engaged in producing soil information must become familiar with the technologies and their potential uses and limitations. More importantly, the users of soil survey information must be convinced of the relevance and applicability of maps and data that appear different from the “traditional” products with which they have become familiar. New challenges include developing acceptable standards and procedures for the production and quality control and interpretation of the information that relates to agricultural, engineering, forestry and other soil-landscape uses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Farm Bill Conservation Provisions. US Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. 19Mar. 2006 <http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/farmbill/2002/>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Why a Watershed Approach Is Being Used. US Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. 19 Mar. 2006 <http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/csp/watershed_ approach_reasons.html/>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R.W. 1983. Concepts of soils and pedology. In: L.P. Wilding, N.E. Smeck and G.F. Hall (eds.), Pedogenesis and Soil Taxonomy I. Concepts and Interactions. Elsevier, NY, pp. 1–21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Code of Iowa, 441.21 Actual, assessed and taxable value. <http://www.legis.state.ia.us/IACODE/ 2003SUPPLEMENT/441/21.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glocker, C.L. and R.A. Patzer. 1978. Soil Survey of Dane County, Wisconsin. U.S. Dept. Agric., Soil Cons. Serv. in coop. with College of Agric. and Life Sci., Univ. of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B.D. 1992. The soil survey as a paradigm-based science. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56: 346–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trayvick, J.C. 1995. Soil Survey of Barbour County, Alabama. U.S. Dept. Agric., Nat. Res. Cons.Serv. in coop. with Alabama Agric. Exp. Stat. and Alabama Soil and Water Cons. Dist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull, P., J. Franklin, O.a. Chadwick, and D. McArthur. 2003. Predictive soil mapping: A review. Progress in Physical Geography 27: 171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey of Barbour County Map Manuscript, Alabama, 1995. Clayton North Quadrangle, Sheet 11 of 27 Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2005. National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI. [Online] Available: http://soils.usda.gov/technical/handbook/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, A.X. 1999. A personal construct-based knowledge acquisition process for natural resource mapping. Int. J. Geog. Inform. Sci. 13:119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, A.X., A.C. Moore, M.P. Smith, J. Liu, J.E. Burt, F. Qi, D. Simonson, J. Hempel and K. Lubich, 2004. Advances in information technology for soil surveys: The SoLIM effort. In: H. Eswaran, P Vijarnsorn, T. Vearasilp, and E. Padmanabhan (eds.), Innovative Techniques in Soil Survey: Developing the Foundation for a New Generation of Soil Resource Inventories and Their Utilization. Land Development Department, Chattuchak, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hempel, J., Hammer, R., Moore, A., Bell, J., Thompson, J., Golden, M. (2008). Challenges to Digital Soil Mapping. In: Hartemink, A.E., McBratney, A., Mendonça-Santos, M.d. (eds) Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8592-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics