Advertisement

Abstract

Land evaluation is the prediction of land performance over time under specific uses. These predictions are then used to guide strategic land-use decisions. Modern land evaluation has a 30-year history, yet the results are generally accepted to be disappointing. Land users and planners are inclined to ignore land evaluators, reflecting the poor quality and low relevance of many actual land evaluations, as well as poor communication with users. The main objective of this research was to improve use and usefulness of information for rural land use decisions based on an operational demand-driven approach for land evaluation with case studies in Santa Catarina State, Brazil. First, the use and usefulness of soil surveys and land evaluation reports to land use planners were described and quantified and the relation between latent demand and actual supply was observed. Then, the farmers’ decision environment and its implications for land evaluation were studied. These were the basis for the subsequent steps of this research. Next, the applicability of a data-intensive distributed environmental model (AgNPS) in a relatively data-poor environment was evaluated. This model and other tools for visualization of scenarios were used with community participation, to test their effects on collective understanding of shared environmental problems. Finally, the potential of a participatory approach for integrating risk analysis into decision making for rural land use was evaluated. This research showed that a demand-driven approach to make the information more relevant and useful to rural decision makers for land use planning is possible in practice and should be further explored, but its effectiveness needs time to be confirmed. Applying the proposed approach, new demands were raised and considering that the number of soil scientists and financial resources are scarce in the region, digital soil mapping based on existing data emerges as a potential alternative to help to answer to the increasing rural decision makers demands.

Keywords

Decision Maker Participatory Approach Land User Rural Land Land Evaluation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacic, I.L.Z., 2003. Demand-driven land evaluation: with case studies in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University and ITC.Google Scholar
  2. Bacic, I.L.Z., Rossiter, D.G., Bregt, A.K., 2003. The use of land evaluation information by land use planners and decision-makers: a case study in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Soil Use and Management 19, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacic, I.L.Z., Bregt, A.K., Rossiter, D.G., 2006a. A participatory approach for integrating risk assessment into rural decision-making: a case study in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Agricultural Systems 87, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacic, I.L.Z., Rossiter, D.G., Bregt, A.K., 2006b. Using spatial information to improve collective understanding of shared environmental problems at watershed level. Landscape and Urban Planning 77, 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouma, J., 1997. The land use systems approach to planning sustainable land management at several scales. ITC Journal 1997-3/4, 237–242.Google Scholar
  6. Bouma, J., 1999. Land evaluation for landscape units. In: Sumner, M.E. (Ed.), Handbook of Soil Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. E393–E412.Google Scholar
  7. Buttler, I., Riha, S., Wilkens, P., Rossiter, D.G., Sampath, R., Philips, J., Simoens, P., Melkonian, J., 1997. General-purpose Atmosphere-plant-soil Simulator – GAPS. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, S., Jarvis, A., Gonzalez, J.P., 2006. Digital soil mapping for the 21st Century: where to from here? In: Mendonça-Santos, M.L. & McBratney, A.B. (Eds.), 2nd GWDSM, 2006: Program and Full Papers for the 2nd Global Workshop On Digital Soil Mapping – DSM for regions and countries with sparse spatial data infrastructure. Embrapa, 4–7 July 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Lagacherie, P., 2006. Digital soil mapping: a state of art. In: Mendonça-Santos, M.L. & McBratney, A.B. (Eds.), 2nd GWDSM, 2006: Program and Full Papers for the 2nd Global Workshop On Digital Soil Mapping – DSM for regions and countries with sparse spatial data infrastructure. Embrapa, 4–7 July 2006.Google Scholar
  10. Mayr, T., Palmer, R., 2006. Digital soil mapping using existing data – difficulties and potentials. In: Mendonça-Santos, M.L. & McBratney, A.B. (Eds.), 2nd GWDSM, 2006: Program and Full Papers for the 2nd Global Workshop On Digital Soil Mapping – DSM for regions and countries with sparse spatial data infrastructure. Embrapa, 4–7 July 2006.Google Scholar
  11. Palisade Corporation, 1998. @RISK. Release 3.5.2. Palisade Corporation, Newfield, NY.Google Scholar
  12. Rossiter, D.G., 1996. A theoretical framework for land evaluation (with discussion). Geoderma 72, 165–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Diepen, C.A., Van Keulen, H., Wolf, J., Berkhout, J.A.A., 1991. Land evaluation: from intuition to quantification. In: Stewart, B.A. (Ed.), Advances in Soil Science. Springer, New York, pp. 139–204.Google Scholar
  14. Young, R.A., Onstad, C.A., Bosch, D.D., Anderson, W.P., 1987. AgNPS, Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Model: A Watershed Analysis Tool. Conservation Research Report 35. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  15. Young, R.A., Onstad, C.A., Bosch, D.D., Anderson, W.P., 1989. AgNPS: a nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44, 168–173.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • I.L.Z. Bacic
    • 1
  1. 1.Epagri/Ciram – Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensáo Rural de Santa Catarina S.A., Centro de Informações de Recursos Ambientais e de Hidrometeorologia de Santa CatarinaC.P. 502. 88034-901 FlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations