Abstract
The intricate coupling between the numerical discretization of scalar field transport and the modeling of unresolved sub-grid scale fluctuations of chemical species is discussed. It is shown how the closures for the sub-grid scale scalar dissipation rate combine modeling of small scale diffusion with two error terms measuring the lack of accuracy in the transport of scalar field fluctuations energy. Then, the need of accounting for the three-dimensional character of turbulent flows at boundaries of computational domains is illustrated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baum M, Poinsot T, Thévenin D (1995) Accurate boundary conditions for multicomponent reactive flows. Journal of Computational Physics 116(2):247–261
Bogey C, Bailly C (2007) An analysis of the correlations between the turbulent flow and the sound pressure fields of subsonic jets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 583:71–97
Bray KNC (1996) The challenge of turbulent combustion. Proceedings of Combustion Institute 26:1–26
Cabra R, Chen JY, Dibble RW, Karpetis AN, Barlow RS (2005) Lifted methane-air jet flame in vitiated coflow. Combustion and Flame 143(4):491–506
Domingo P, Vervisch L, Payet S, Hauguel R (2005) DNS of a premixed turbulent V-flame and LES of a ducted-flame using a FSD-PDF subgrid scale closure with FPI-tabulated chemistry. Combustion and Flame 143(4):566–586
Domingo P, Vervisch L, Veynante D (2008) Large-eddy simulation of a lifted methane-air jet flame in a vitiated coflow. Combustion and Flame 152(3):{415–432}
Ducros F, Comte P, Lesieur M (1996) Large-eddy simulation of transition to turbulence in a boundary layer developing spatially over a flat plate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 326:1–36
Ducros F, Laporte F, Souléres T, Guinot V, Moinat P, Caruelle B (2000) High-order fluxes for conservative skew-symmetric-like schemes in structured meshes: application to compressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics 161: 114–139
Hixon R, Shih SH, Mankabadi RR (1995) Evaluation of boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics. AIAA Journal 33(11):2006–2012
Klein M, Meyers J, Geurts BJ (2008) Assessment of LES quality measures using the error landscape approach. In: Meyers J, Geurts BJ, Sagaut P (eds) Quality and Reliability of Large Eddy Simulation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Lodato G, Domingo P, Vervisch L (2008) Three-dimensional boundary conditions for direct and large-eddy simulation of compressible viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics 227(10):5105–5143
Morinishi Y, Lund TS, Vasilyev OV, Moin P (1998) Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. Journal of Computational Physics 143(1):90–124
Nicoud F (1999) Defining wave amplitude in characteristic boundary conditions. Journal of Computational Physics 149:418–422
Okong’o N, Bellan J (2002) Consistent boundary conditions for multicomponent real gas mixtures based on characteristic waves. Journal of Computational Physics 176(2):330–344
Poinsot T, Lele SK (1992) Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics 1(101):104–129
Polifke W, Wall C, Moin P (2006) Partially reflecting and non-reflecting boundary conditions for simulation of compressible viscous flow. Journal of Computational Physics 213(1):437–449
Rudy DH, Strikwerda JC (1980) A nonreflecting outflow boundary condition for subsonic Navier–Stokes calculations. Journal of Computational Physics 36:55–70
Sutherland JC, Kennedy CA (2003) Improved boundary conditions for viscous, reacting, compressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics 191(2):502–524
Tam CKW (1998) Advances in numerical boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics. Journal of Computational Acoustics 6(4):377–402
Thompson KW (1987) Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems. Journal of Computational Physics 68:1–24
Thompson KW (1990) Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, {II}. Journal of Computational Physics 89:439–461
Vervisch L, Hauguel R, Domingo P, Rullaud M (2004) Three facets of turbulent combustion modelling: DNS of premixed V-flame, LES of lifted nonpremixed flame and RANS of jet-flame. Journal of Turbulence 5, Art no 4
Yoo CS, Wang Y, Trouvé A, Im HG (2005) Characteristic boundary conditions for direct simulations of turbulent counterflow flames. Combustion Theory and Modeling 9(4):617–646
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vervisch, L., Lodato, G., Domingo, P. (2008). Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulation of Nonpremixed Turbulent Flames: Scalar Dissipation Rate Modeling and 3D-Boundary Conditions. In: Meyers, J., Geurts, B.J., Sagaut, P. (eds) Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations. Ercoftac Series, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8578-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8578-9_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8577-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8578-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)