More Than SF-36? Using Narratives to Elaborate Health and Well-Being Data in Recent Lower-Limb Amputees

  • Narelle Warren
  • Lenore Manderson
  • RoseAnne Misajon
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 35)

Limited research has been conducted on the health-related quality of life of people who have undergone a major amputation. This paper explores the complexities of this population, through narratives elicited during in-depth interviews to elaborate data collected through administration of the SF-36 on self-reported health and well-being. Sixty inpatients aged 21–89 were recruited following the amputation of one or both lower limbs whilst at four (two rural, two urban) rehabilitation centres in Victoria, Australia. Results indicated a significant decrease in health-related quality of life in relation to the physical components of the SF-36. However, these limitations were viewed as temporary, and people anticipated a return to higher levels of physical functioning post-rehabilitation. No significant difference was found in regard to mental health (amount of time a person experienced feelings of nervousness, anxiety, depression and happiness) or the overall mental component summary scores, but participants scored significantly lower on three of the four mental components compared with Australian population norms. Qualitative data indicated that participants experienced feelings of social isolation, hopelessness, and grief following their amputation, all impacting significantly on their mental health. Our results highlight the limitations to using the SF-36 as a stand-alone instrument to assess quality of life in a mostly elderly, ill population.


Amputation Australia qualitative research methods quality of life 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1997). ASCO: Australian Standard Classification of Occupations. 2nd Edition. ABS Catalogue No. 1220.0. (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia)Google Scholar
  2. Bak, P., Muller, W.D., Bocker, B. & Smolenski, U.C. (2006). Responsiveness of the SF-36 and FIM in lower extremity amputees undergoing a multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation. Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin, 16, 280–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clavarino, A.M. (1999). Using quality of life endpoints in palliative care: the cultural implications. Anthropology and Medicine, 6, 405–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cumming, J.C., Barr, S. & Howe, T.E. (2006). Prosthetic rehabilitation for older dysvascular people following a unilateral transfemoral amputation. Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 4, CD005260Google Scholar
  5. Cummins, R.A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64, 225–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Godoy, J.M.P., Braile, D.M., Buttazo, S.H.G. Longo Jr., O. & Fontes, O.A. (2002). Quality of life after amputation. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 7, 397–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desmond, D.M. & MacLachlan, M. (2006). Coping strategies as predictors of psychosocial adaptation in a sample of elderly veterans with acquired lower limb amputations. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dillingham, T.R., Pezzin, L.E. & MacKenzie, E.J. (2002). Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. Southern Medical Journal, 95, 875–883Google Scholar
  9. Ehde, D.M., Czerniecki, J.M., Smith, D.G., Campbell, K.M., Edwards, W.T. et al. (2000). Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1039–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faircloth, C.A., Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., Young, M.E. & Gubruim, J. (2004). Sudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26, 242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortin, M., Bravo, G., Hudon, C., Lapointe, L., Almirall, J. et al. (2006). Relationship between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life of patients in primary care. Quality of Life Research, 15, 83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fusetti, C., Senechaud, C. & Merlini, M. (2001). Quality of life following lower limb amputation for vascular disease. Annales De Chirurgie, 126, 434–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallagher, P. & MacLachlan, M. (1999). Psychological adjustment and coping in adults with prosthetic limbs. Behavioral Medicine, 25, 117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gubrium, J., Rittman, M., Williams, C., Young, M.E. & Boylstein, C. (2003). Benchmarking as everyday functional assessment in stroke recovery. The Journals of Gerontology, 58B, S203–S211Google Scholar
  15. Hagberg, K. & Branemark, R. (2001). Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: a survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 25, 186–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanley, M.A., Ehde, D.M., Campbell, K.M., Osborn, B. & Smith, D.G. (2006). Self-reported treatments used for lower-limb phantom pain: descriptive findings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harness, N. & Pinzur, M.S. (2001). Health related quality of life in patients with dysvascular transtibial amputation. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 383, 204–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendry, F. & McVittie, C. (2004). Is quality of life a healthy concept? Measuring and understanding life experiences of older people. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 961–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hyndman, D.C. (1985). The good go to heaven and the bad go to hell: doing patienthood on the orthopaedic ward. (In L. Manderson (Ed), Australian ways: anthropological studies of an industrialised society (pp.113–125). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.)Google Scholar
  20. Jensen, M., Ehde, D., Hoffman, A., Patterson, B.M., Czerniecki, J. & Robinson, L.R. (2002). Cognitions, coping and social environment predict adjustment to phantom limb pain. Pain, 95, 133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ko, Y. & Coons, S.J. (2005). An examination of self-reported chronic conditions and health status in the 2001 Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. Current Medical Research & Opinion, 21, 1801–1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lacey, E.A. & Walters, S.J. (2003). Continuing inequality: gender and social class influences on self perceived health after a heart attack. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 622–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacKenzie, E.J., Bosse, M.J., Castillo, R.C., Smith, D.G., Webb, L.X. et al. (2004). Functional outcomes following trauma-related lower-extremity amputation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 86-A, 1636–1645Google Scholar
  24. Mallinson, S. (2002). Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maramaldi, P., Berkman, B. & Barusch, A. (2005). Assessment and the ubiquity of culture: Threats to validity in measures of health-related quality of life. Health & Social Work, 30, 27–38Google Scholar
  26. Mattingly, C. (1994). The concept of therapeutic ‘emplotment’. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 811–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murray, C.D. & Fox, J. (2002). Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower limb amputee. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 925–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ory, M.G. & Williams, T.F. (1989). Rehabilitation: Small goals, sustained interventions. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 503, 60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parslow, R., Jorm, A., Christensen, H., Jacomb, P. & Rogers, B. (2004). Gender differences in factors affecting use of health services: an analysis of a community study of middle-aged and older Australians. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 2121–2129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pezzin, L.E., Dillingham, T.R., MacKenzie, E.J., Ephraim, P. & Rossbach, P. (2004). Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 723–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rybarczyk, B., Edwards, R. & Behel, J. (2004). Diversity in adjustment to a leg amputation: case illustrations of common themes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 944–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saito, I., Inami, F., Ikebe, T., Moriwaki, C., Tsubakimoto, A. et al. (2006). Impact of diabetes on health-related quality of life in a population study in Japan. Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, 73, 51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon, J.G., De Boer, J.B., Joung, I.M., Bosma, H. & Mackenbach, J.P. (2005). How is your health in general? A qualitative study on self-assessed health. European Journal of Public Health, 15, 200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sin, M.K., Sanderson, B., Weaver, M., Giger, J., Pemberton, J. & Klapow, J. (2004). Personal characteristics, health status, physical activity, and quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation participants. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. SPSS, Inc. (2005). SPSS 14.0 for Windows. (Chicago, IL: SPSS)Google Scholar
  36. Stewart, A.L., Greenfield, S., Hays, R.D., Wells, K., Rogers, W.H. et al. (1989). Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 262, 907–913Google Scholar
  37. van der Schans, C.P., Geertzen, J.H.B., Schoppen, T. & Dijkstra, P.U. (2002). Phantom pain and health-related quality of life in lower limb amputees. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 24, 429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ware, J. (1993). SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide (Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center)Google Scholar
  39. Ware, J.E. & Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The Mos 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). 1.Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warren, N. (2007). Markers of midlife: interrogating health, illness and ageing in rural Australia. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis (Melbourne: University of Melbourne)Google Scholar
  41. Warren, N. Manderson, L. (2008). Constructing hope: Dis/continuity and the narrative construction of recovery in the rehabilitation unit. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37 (2), 180–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wee, H.L., Li, S.C., Cheung, Y.B., Fong, K.Y. & Thumboo, J. (2006). The influence of ethnicity on health-related quality of life in diabetes mellitus — A population-based, multiethnic study. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications, 20, 170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wittig, J.C., Bickels, J., Priebat, D., Jelinek, J., Kellar-Graney, K. et al. (2002). Osteosarcoma: a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment. American Family Physician, 65, 1123–1132Google Scholar
  44. Yost, K.J., Haan, M.N., Levine, R.A. & Gold, E.B. (2005). Comparing SF-36 scores across three groups of women with different health profiles. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1251–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Narelle Warren
    • 1
  • Lenore Manderson
    • 2
  • RoseAnne Misajon
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Fellow, School of Psychology, Psychiatry&Psychologiccal MedicineMonash University (Caulfield)Caulfield East VICAustralia
  2. 2.Professor, School of Psychology, Psychiatry&Psychological MedicineMonash UniversityCaulfield East

Personalised recommendations