Creating Collaborative Visions with Aboriginal Women: A Photovoice Project

  • Carolyn Brooks
  • Jennifer Poudrier
  • Roanne Thomas-MacLean
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 34)

Abstract

This chapter provides a critical appraisal of cross-cultural research, using the photovoice method with Aboriginal women. Photovoice is defined as a participatory action research method, as well as a process towards health promotion. Participants take pictures to document their realities and engage in critical reflection individually and in a group process, using images and stories to advocate community and policy changes. This chapter focuses on some of the methodological challenges and accomplishments associated with photovoice and our project entitled Visualizing Breast Cancer. Our participants were 12 Aboriginal survivors of Breast Cancer from Saskatchewan, Canada. We discuss our collective successes as well as some of the responsibilities and risks of conducting research with Aboriginal women, including recruitment, participation, retention, community-building, advocacy and ethics. Interpretive boundaries and the “truths” of qualitative research (relative to the research setting) add a further appraisal of the complexities of this type of qualitative research and the powerful lessons of research and unplanned happenings.

Photovoice methodology Aboriginal women Participatory Action Research (PAR) Critical reflection Survivorof breast cancer Advocacy Community building Empowerment Decolonising research methodology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashing, K. T., Padilla, G., Tejero, J., & Kagawa-Singer, M. (2003). Understanding the breast cancer experience of Asian American women. Psycho-Oncology, 12(1),38-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assembly of First Nations. (Nov. 2005). Retrieve from http://www.afn.ca/Media/assembly_of_first_nations_bullet.htm
  3. Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 5th edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  4. Canadian Cancer Society (2005). Breast cancer statistics. http://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/pubs/b5_factsheets/b5/factsheets_7_e.pdf.Cited 14 February, 2006.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Gotay, C., Holup, J., & Pagano, I. (2002). Ethnic differences in quality of life among early breast and prostate cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 11(13), 102-113.Google Scholar
  7. Harrison, B. (2002). Seeing health and illness worlds - Using visual methodologies in a sociology of health and illness: A methodological review. Sociology of Health and Illness, 24(6), 856-872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods . London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods, 2nd edition. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lopez, E. D. S., Eng, E., Randall-David, E., & Robinson, N. (2005a). Quality-of-life concerns of African American breast cancer survivors within rural North Carolina: Blending the tech-niques of photovoice and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 15(1), 99-114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lopez, E. D. S, Eng, E., Robinson, N., & Wang, C. C. (2005b). Photovoice as a community-based participatory research method: A case study with African American breast cancer survivors in rural Eastern North Carolina. In B. Israel, E. Eng, A. J. Schulz, E. Parker and D. Satcher (Eds.), Methods for conducting community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Marrett, L., Jones, C. R., and Wishart, K., (2004). First Nations cancer research and surveillance priorities for canada: Workshop report, September 23 - 24, 2003. Ottawa, Ontario. http://www.cancercare.on.ca/documentsw/ACSFirstNationsWorkshopReport.pdf. Cited 14 February, 2006.
  13. Minkler, M. (2000). Using Participatory Action Research to build healthy communities. Public Health Report, 115(2-3), 191-197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitchell, T. L., Burhansstipanov, L., Baker, E., & St. Germaine Small, M. (Advisory Group). (2005). Power point presentation on the Aboriginal Women’s Cancer Care Project, Halifax, 8 -12 June, 2005, World Conference on Breast Cancer.Google Scholar
  15. Moffitt, P., & Robinson Vollman, A. (2004). Photovoice: Picturing the health of Aboriginal women in a remote northern Community. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research,36(4), 189-201.Google Scholar
  16. Rigney, L. (1999). Internationalization of an Indigenous anticolonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to Indigenist research methodology and its principles. Wicazo SA Journal of Native American Studies Review, 14(2), 109-121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schnarch B. (2004). Ownership, control, access and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nation communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1, 80-95.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, L. T. (2006). On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In N. K. Denzin and M. D. Giardina (Eds.) Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge: confronting methodological fundamentalism (pp. 85-107). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Stasz, C. (1979). The early history of visual sociology. In J. Wagner (Ed.). Images of information (pp. 119-136). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Status of Women Canada (2005). Women and health. http://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/pubs/b5_factsheets/b5_factsheets_7_e.pdf. Cited 14 January 2005.
  21. Tagg, John. (1988). The burden of representations: Essays on photographies and histories. Basingstoke, UK: MacMillan Education.Google Scholar
  22. Tomich, P. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Five years later: A cross-sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women. Psycho-Oncology, 11, 154-169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wallerstein, N. (2006). What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe (Health Evidence network report). http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E88086.pdf.. Cited 15 February 2006.
  24. Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8, 185-192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, C. (2003). Using photovoice as a participatory assessment and issue selection tool: A case study with the homeless in Ann Arbor. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community based participatory research for health (pp. 179 - 196). California: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Wang, C., & Burris, M.A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology and use for participatory needs assessment. Health and Behaviour, 24, 369-387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn Brooks
    • 1
  • Jennifer Poudrier
    • 1
  • Roanne Thomas-MacLean
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of SaskatchewanCanada

Personalised recommendations