Advertisement

Zombie Concepts and Boomerang Effects

Uncertainty, Risk, and Security Intersection through the Lens of Environmental Change
  • P. H. Liotta
  • Allan W. Shearer
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Focusing on the challenges of environmental change and human impact, the Authors consider how different mindsets or mental maps lead to alternative risk responses and, consequently, alternative prioritizations of different kinds of security. The uncertainties associated with environmental change are difficult to quantify, yet the impacts may be severe. We argue that we cannot so reduce the uncertainty of the science that can definitively end debate about appropriate policy. Instead, we must learn to integrate uncertainty into decision making processes and consider how our near-term actions enable or constrain future options. Presenting a critical approach to defining human and environmental security, we also distinguish between threats and vulnerabilities and their impact. To examine the relationships between security and risk, we draw on two central metaphors. First, the tenets of traditional security are critiqued vis-à-vis Ulrich Beck's “zombie concepts” of modernism, which emphasize the State and thereby fail to engage the multiple and interdependent processes of change we now face. In this context, we discuss broadly how new solutions beget increased risk and how new knowledge yields greater uncertainty. Second, using P. H. Liotta's “ boomerang effect,” we look more narrowly at how policies intended to address some specific dimension of security can undermine other dimensions. When these metaphors are considered as a set of related ideas, it becomes apparent that the world is confronted with socially produced and human-centered vulnerabilities. Further, the potential for local and localized risk has mutated into systemic risk that affects both the “developing” and “developed” parts of the world. Responses to climate change, in particular, must therefore accommodate thinking in terms of multiple facets of security.

Keywords

Risk uncertainty environmental change policy human security environmental security 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anders, G., 1962, Theses for the atomic age, Massachusetts Review 3(3):493–505.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U., 1992, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. M. Ritter, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U., 1995, Ecological Politics in the Age of Risk, Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U., 1998, The Politics of Risk Society, Institute for Public Policy Research, London, pp. 587–595.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U., 1999, World Risk Society, Polity, Cambridge, pp. 112–116.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U., and Willms, J., 2004, Conversations with Ulrich Beck, trans. M. Pollak, Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U., Giddens, A., and Lash, S., 1994, Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition, and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Bissell, T., 2003, A comet’s tale: On the science of Apocalypse, Harper’s 306(1833):33–47.Google Scholar
  9. Courtney, H., Kirkland, J., and Viguerie, P., 1997, Strategy under uncertainty, Harvard Business Review 75(November):66–79.Google Scholar
  10. Espenshade, E., 1995, Goode’s World Atlas, Rand McNally, New York, p. 27.Google Scholar
  11. Esty, D., 2000, A term’s limits, Foreign Policy, September–October.Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, A., 1990, The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Giddens, A., 1998, Beyond Left and Right, Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Giddens, A., 1999, Risk and responsibility, Modern Law Review 62(1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glenn, J., et al., 1998, Defining Environmental Security: Implications for the U.S. Army, U.S. Army Environmental Policy Institute, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  16. Hobbes, T., 1985, The Leviathan, edited and with an introduction by C. B. MacPherson, Penguin Books, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2001, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Working Group II Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Keynes, J. M., 1936, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. 1964 reprint, Harcourt Brace, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Keynes, J. M., 1937, The general theory of employment, Quarterly Journal of Economics 51:209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King, W. C., 2000a, Remarks from the U.S. Army Senior Environmental Leadership Conference, Washington, DC, March.Google Scholar
  22. King, W. C., 2000b, Understanding environmental security: A military perspective, unpublished advanced research project written while a West Point Fellow serving at the U.S. Naval War College.Google Scholar
  23. Kolbert, E., 2006, Field Notes from a Catastrophe: Man, Nature, and Climate Change, Bloomsbury, London, p. 187.Google Scholar
  24. Liotta, P. H., 2002a, The boomerang effect: The convergence of national and human security, Security Dialogue 12(33):473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liotta, P. H., 2002b, The boomerang returns, Security Dialogue 12(33):495–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liotta, P. H., 2003, The Uncertain Certainty: Environmental Change, Human Security, and the Future Euro-Mediterranean, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, p. 72.Google Scholar
  27. Liotta, P. H., and Owen, T., 2006a, Sense and symbolism: Europe takes on human security, Parameters 36(3):85–102.Google Scholar
  28. Liotta, P. H., and Owen, T., 2006b, Why human security? Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 7(1):1–18.Google Scholar
  29. Liotta, P. H., and Shearer, A. W., 2007, Gaia’s Revenge: Climate Change and Humanity’s Loss, Praeger, Greenwood, CT, pp. 38–40; 43; 56; 62; 128.Google Scholar
  30. MacDonald, B. et al., eds., 2007, Defence Requirements for Canada’s Arctic, Vimy Paper 2007, The Conference of Defence Associations Institute (July 26, 2007); http://www.cda-cdai.ca/Focus%20Briefs/4–07%20Arctic%20Patrol%20Ships%20and%20Canada’s%20Arctic%20Sovereignty%20.pdf.
  31. Myers, N., 1986, The environmental dimension to security issues, The Environmentalist 6(4):251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rothschild, E., 1995, What is security? The quest for world order, Dædulus: The Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 124(3).Google Scholar
  33. Scott, J. C., 1997, The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, p. 1.Google Scholar
  34. Taleb, N. N., 2007, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Union of Concerned Scientists, 2007, Science of global warming: Future projections of climate change, July 27; http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/projections-of-climate-change.html.
  36. United Nations Commission on Human Security, 2003, Protecting and Empowering People, http://www.humansecurity-chs.org/finalreport/index.html.
  37. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 1994, Human Development Report: Annual Report, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 22–25.Google Scholar
  38. United States Department of Defense, 1996, Environmental Security, Directive 4715.1, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  39. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1999, Environmental Security, 160–F99-01, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  40. Urry, J., 2004, Thinking society anew, Introduction in: Conversations with Ulrich Beck, U. Beck and J. Willms, trans. M. Pollak, Polity, London, pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
  41. Wæver, O., 2000, The traditional and new security agenda: Influence for the third world, paper presented at Universidad Torcutato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, 11 September, quoted in Scheetz, T., 2002, The limits to environmental security as a role for the armed forces, paper presented at the Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies symposium, Brasilia, 8 August.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. H. Liotta
    • 1
  • Allan W. Shearer
    • 2
  1. 1.Pell Center for International Relations and Public PolicySalve Regina UniversityNewportUSA
  2. 2.Department of Landscape Architecture and Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial AnalysisRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations