Forest Management and Carbon Sink Dynamics: a Study in Boreal and Sub-Alpine Forest Regions

  • Chao Li
  • Shirong Liu
  • Yuandong Zhang
  • Jianwei Liu
  • Chuanwen Luo


Increased human activities have changed global ecosystems that include the dynamics of carbon (C) stocks in forest lands, which are determined by the sizes of living biomass, dead woody materials and soil C pools. This study focuses on C dynamics in living biomass that has been used in international reporting. Based on the forest conditions of Fort A La Corne (FALC) in central Saskatchewan, Canada and Miyaluo in Sichuan Province, P.R. China, this study employed a strategic model to simulate C stock dynamics under various combinations of forest fire and harvest alternatives. Our simulation results suggest that the forest C sink size is less likely to be sustained with a simple strategy of complete protection against all disturbances. Changes in the C sink size are largely attributed to the dynamics of forest age distribution. Forest management options that keep forests within a certain range of mean forest age could result in both higher mean annual increment (MAI) and C sequestration rates than the default and average values used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The specific range of mean forest age will be region-specific, depending on the tree species composition and physical conditions. Our simulation results suggest that, in most cases, the FALC forests will function as C sinks except when the fire cycle becomes very short; hence, the area has the potential to positively contribute to the C sink. For Miyaluo forests, a strategy of regulated harvest activities can enhance the C sink.


Forest Management Site Index Mountain Pine Beetle Slope Land Conversion Program Stock Dynamic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development (2004) Annual report: forest health in Alberta, Department of Sustainable Resource Development, Public Lands and Forests Division, Forest Management Branch, Forest Health Section, Edmonton, Alberta, p 54Google Scholar
  2. Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton SR, Spurr SH (1998) Forest ecology, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. BC Ministry of Forests (2003) Timber supply and the mountain pine beetle infestation in British Columbia. Accessed on Feb. 15, 2006
  4. Berger U, Hildenbrandt H, Grimm V (2004) Age-related decline in forest production: modelling the effects of growth limitation, neighbourhood competition and self-thinning. J Ecol 92:846–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binkley D, Stape JL, Ryan MG, Barnard HR, Fownes J (2002) Age-related decline in forest ecosystem growth: an individual-tree, stand-structure hypothesis. Ecosystems 5:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown S (1996) The world’s forest resources. Unasylva 43:3–10Google Scholar
  7. Brown S (1997) Forests and climate change: role of forest lands as carbon sinks. Proceedings of the 11th World Forestry Congress, held in Antalya, Turkey, October 1997, pp 117–129Google Scholar
  8. China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development (2002) Implementing the Natural Forest Protection Program and the Sloping Land Conversion Program: lessons and policy recommendations. Phase III (2002–2007). dlam/Taskforce/grassfindingindex.htmlAccessed on Sept. 20, 2007
  9. Ciais P, Tans PP, Trolier M, White JWC, Francey RJ (1995) A large northern hemispheric terrestrial CO2 sink indicated by the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2. Science 269:1098–1102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clements FE (1916) Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Inst. Pub. 242. Washington, DC, p 512Google Scholar
  11. Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pool and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) (2006) IPCC guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan on behalf of the IPCCGoogle Scholar
  13. Euskirchen ES, Chen J, Li H, Gustafson EJ, Crow TR (2002) Modeling landscape net ecosystem productivity (LandNEP) under alternative management regimes. Ecol Model 154:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodale CL, Apps MJ, Birdsey RA, Field CB, Heath LS, Houghton RA, Jenkins JC, Kohlmaier GH, Kurz W, Liu S, Nabuurs GJ, Nilsson S, Shvidenko AZ (2002) Forest carbon sinks in the northern hemisphere. Ecol Appl 2:891–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gower ST, McMurtrie RE (1999) An analysis of the age-related decline in aboveground net primary production; potential causes and stand-to-global scale implications. Santa Barbara (CA): NCEAS, University of Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  16. Gower ST, McMurtrie RE, Murty D (1996) Aboveground net primary production decline with stand age: potential causes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:378–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harmon ME, Ferrell WK, Franklin JF (1990) Effects on carbon storage of conversion of old-growth forests to young forests. Science 247:699–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Houghton RA (1996) Terrestrial sources and sinks of carbon inferred from terrestrial data. Tellus Ser. B Chem Phys Meteorol 48:430–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change. In Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs KD, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Xiao D (eds) Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Kauppi PE, Mielikainen K, Kuusela K (1992) Biomass and carbon budget of European forests, 1971 to 1990. Science 256:70–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kurz WA, Apps MJ (1999) A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector. Ecol Appl 9:526–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li C (2004) Simulating forest fire regimes in the foothills of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. In Perera AH, Buse LJ, Weber MG (eds) Emulating natural forest landscape disturbances: concepts and applications. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY, pp 98–111Google Scholar
  23. Li C, Barclay HJ (2001) Fire disturbance patterns and forest age structure. Nat Resour Model 14:495–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li C, Barclay H (2004) Simulation of Interactions among fire, mountain pine beetle and lodgepole pine forest. In Shore TL, Brooks JE, Stone JE (eds) Mountain pine beetle symposium: challenges and solutions, Can. For. Serv., Inf. Rep. BC-X-399, Victoria, BC, pp 257–266Google Scholar
  25. Li C, Barclay HJ, Hawkes BC, Taylor SW (2005a) Lodgepole pine forest age class dynamics and susceptibility to mountain pine beetle attack. Ecol Complex 2:232–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li C, Barclay H, Liu J, Campbell D (2005b) Simulation of historical and current fire regimes in central Saskatchewan. For Ecol Manag 208:319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li CP (1990) Ecological Research of Sichuan Forests. Sichuan Sci. & Tec. Press, Chengdu, PR, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  28. Li CW, Ge JP, Liu SR, Sun PS (2006) Landscape pattern and eco-hydrological characteristics at the upstream of Minjiang River, China. Front Biol China 1(4):455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu SR, Shi ZM, Chen LW, Liu XL (2002) Improving eco-environemnt in upper reaches of Yangze River by enhancing forest ecosystem services. Study report Vol 2 of forestry strategy of China sustainable development. In Jiang ZH (ed) China Forestry Publishing House, pp 163–170Google Scholar
  30. Liu SR, Sun PS, Wang JX, Chen LW (2001) Hydrological functions of forest vegetation in upper reaches of Yangze river. J Nat Resour 16(6):451–456Google Scholar
  31. Liu SR, Wang JX, Chen LW (2003) Ecology and restoration of sub-alpine ecosystem in western Sichuan, China. Inf Bot Ital 35(1):29–34Google Scholar
  32. Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L (eds) (2005) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY, p 443Google Scholar
  33. Noormets A, Chen J, Crow TR (2007) Age-dependent changes in ecosystem carbon fluxes in managed forests in northern Wisconsin, USA. Ecosystems 10:187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pan Y, Luo T, Birdsey R, Hom J, Melillo J (2004) New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China’s forests: effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimate. Climate Change 67:211–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F (eds) (2003) IPCC good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  37. Pregitzer KS, Euskirchen ES (2004) Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age. Global Change Biol 10:2052–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH (1997) Age-related decline in forest productivity: pattern and process. Adv Ecol Res 27:213–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryu SR, Chen J, Zheng D, Bresee MK, Crow TR (2006) Simulating the effects of prescribed burning on fuel loading and timber production (EcolFL) in managed northern Wisconsin Forests. Ecol Model 196:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saskatchewan Environment (1999) Fort A La Corne integrated forest land use plan – background information. Accessed on Feb 15, 2006Google Scholar
  41. Sedjo RA (1992) Temperate forest ecosystems in the global carbon cycle. Ambio 21:274–277Google Scholar
  42. Stephens BR, Gurney KR, Tans PP, Sweeney C, Peters W, Bruhwiler L, Ciais P et al (2007) Weak northern and strong tropical land carbon uptake from vertical profiles of atmospheric CO2. Science 316:1732–1735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Wagner CE (1978) Age-class distribution and the forest fire cycle. Can J For Res 8:220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Von Mirbach M (2000) Carbon budget accounting at the forest management unit level: an overview of issues and methods. Canada’s Model Forest Program, Can. For. Serv., Nat. Resour. Can., Ottawa, ON, Accessed on Feb 15, 2006Google Scholar
  45. Walters KR, Cogswell A (2002) Spatial forest planning: where did all the wood go? Forest Technology Group, Remsoft Inc., Accessed on Feb 15, 2006Google Scholar
  46. Watson R, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verado DJ, Dokken DJ (2000) Land use, land-use change and forestry. Special Report of the IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, p 377Google Scholar
  47. Yang YP (1985) Guidelines for mountain forest management. Sichuan Science and Technology Press, Chengdu, p 395Google Scholar
  48. Zhang YD, Liu SR, Ma JM (2006) Water-holding capacity of ground covers and soils in alpine and sub-alpine shrubs in western Sichuan, China. Acta Ecol Sin 26:2775–2782CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chao Li
    • 1
  • Shirong Liu
  • Yuandong Zhang
  • Jianwei Liu
  • Chuanwen Luo
  1. 1.Canadian Wood Fibre CentreCanadian Forest Service, Natural Resources CanadaEdmontonCanada T6H 3S5

Personalised recommendations