Advertisement

Studying the “Addiction to Oil” of Developed Societies Using the Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal Metabolism (MSIASM)

  • Mario Giampietro
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

This paper is organized in three parts. Part 1 introduces relevant concepts used in the rest of the paper. Part 2 presents the approach called Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal Metabolism (MSIASM), which provides a flexible system of accounting for developing a quantitative analysis of energy conversions and energy flows to study structural and functional changes of socio-economic systems. The peculiarity of this approach is that it makes it possible to handle the epistemological challenge entailed by the metabolism of dissipative systems, which are organized and operating simultaneously on multiple-scales; Part 3 uses the MSIASM approach to study the addiction to oil of developed societies and provides a method to check the desirability and feasibility of potential alternative energy sources to oil.

Keywords

Energy analysis Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal Metabolism (MSIASM) Energy Return on the Investment (EROI) alternative energy sources 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R.N. 1988. The Eighth Day: Social Evolution as the Self-Organization of Energy, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adriaanse, A., Bringezu, S., Hammond, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D., and Schütz, H. 1997. Resource Flows: The Material Basis of Industrial Economies, Washington DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, T.F.H., Tainter, J.A., and Hoekstra, T.W. 2003. Supply-side Sustainability, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ayres, R.U. and Simonis, U.E. 1994. Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development, Tokyo/New York/Paris: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ayres, R.U. and Warr, B. 2005. Accounting for Growth: The Role of Physical Work, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16(2): 181-209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ayres, R.U., Ayres, L.W., and Warr, B. 2003. Exergy, Power and Work in the US Economy, 1900-1998. Energy, 28(3): 219-273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleveland, C.J., Costanza, R., Hall, C.A.S., and Kaufmann, R. 1984. Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective, Science, 225(4665): 890-897.Google Scholar
  8. Cleveland, C.J. 1992. Energy Quality and Energy Surplus in the Extraction of Fossil Fuels in the U.S., Ecological Economics, 6: 139-162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleveland, C.J., Kaufmann, R., and Stern, S.I. 2000. Aggregation and the Role of Energy in the Economy, Ecological Economics, 32: 301-317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cottrell, W.F. 1955. Energy and Society: The Relation Between Energy, Social Change, and Economic Development, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Debeir, J.-C., Deleage, J.-P., and Hemery, D. 1991. In the Servitude of Power: Energy and Civilization Through the Ages, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  12. Duchin, F. 1998. Structural Economics: Measuring Change in Technology, Lifestyles, and the Environment Washington DC/Covelo, CA: The United Nations University, Island Press.Google Scholar
  13. Falconi-Benitez, F. 2001. Integrated Assessment of the Recent Economic History of Ecuador, Population and Environment, 22(3): 257-280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer-Kowalski, M. 1997. Society’s Metabolism: On the Childhood and Adolescence of a Rising Conceptual Star, in: Redclift, M. and Woodgate, G. (eds.), The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, R. and Kay, J.J. 2002. Exergy Analysis of Eco-Systems: Establishing a Role for the Thermal Remote Sensing, in: D. Quattrochi and J. Luvall (eds.), Thermal Remote Sen-sing in Land Surface Processes, London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  16. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1975. Energy and Economic Myths, Southern Economic Journal, 41: 347-381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gever, J., Kaufmann, R., Skole, D., and Vörösmarty, C. 1991. Beyond Oil: The Threat to Food and Fuel in the Coming Decades, Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  19. Giampietro, M. (guest editor) 2000. Special Issue of ‘Population and Environment’ on Societal Metabolism鑲Part 1 of 2: Introduction of the Analytical Tool in Theory, Examples, and Validation of Basic Assumptions. Population and Environment, 22(2): 97-254. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giampietro, M. (guest editor) 2001. Special Issue of Population and Environment on Societal Metabolism-Part 2 of 2: Specific Applications to Case Studies. Population and Envi-ronment, 22(3): 257-352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giampietro, M. 2006. Comments on “The Energetic Metabolism of the European Union and the United States” by Haberl and Colleagues: Theoretical and Practical Considerations on the Meaning and Usefulness of Traditional Energy Analysis, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(4): 173-185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giampietro, M. and Mayumi, K. 2000a. Multiple-scale Integrated Assessment of Societal Metabolism: Introducing the Approach, Population and Environment, 22(2): 109-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giampietro, M. and Mayumi, K. 2000b. Multiple-scale Integrated Assessment of Societal Metabolism: Integrating Biophysical and Economic Representations Across Scales, Population and Environment, 22(2): 155-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giampietro, M. and Mayumi, K. 2003a. Forget about the Occam Razor: Looking for Multi-Scale Mosaic Effects (Chapter 6) in: Giampietro M. Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Agroecosystems, Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  25. Giampietro, M. and Mayumi, K. 2003b. Impredicative Loop Analysis: Dealing with Chicken-Egg Processes (Chapter 7), in: Giampietro M. Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Agro-ecosystems, Boca Raton, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  26. Giampietro, M. and Mayumi, K. 2004. Complex systems and energy, in: C. Cleveland (ed.), Encyclopedia of Energy, San Diego: Elsevier, 1: 617-631.Google Scholar
  27. Giampietro, M. and Ramos-Martin, J. 2005. Multi-scale Integrated Analysis of Sustain-ability: A Methodological Tool to Improve the Quality of the Narratives, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 5(3/4): 119-141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giampietro, M. and Ulgiati, S. 2005. An Integrated Assessment of Large-scale Biofuel Production, Critical Review in Plant Sciences, 24: 1-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giampietro, M., Bukkens, S.G.F., and Pimentel, D. 1993. Labor Productivity: A Biophysical Definition and Assessment, Human Ecology, 21(3): 229-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giampietro, M., Allen, T.F.H., and Mayumi, K. 2006. The Epistemological Predicament Associated with Purposive Quantitative Analysis, Ecological Complexity, 3(4): 307-327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., and Ramos-Martin, J. 2007. How Serious is the Addiction to Oil of Developed Society? A Multi-scale Integrated Analysis Based on the Concept of Societal and Ecosystem Metabolism, International Journal of Transdisciplinary Research, 2 (1): 42-92.Google Scholar
  32. Gilliland, M.W. (ed.), 1978. Energy Analysis: A New Policy Tool, Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hall, C.A.S. and Klitgaard, K.A. 2006. The Need for a New Biophysical-based Paradigm in Economics for the Second Half of the Age of Oil, International Journal of Trans-disciplinary Research, 1(1): 4-22 [http://www.ijtr.org/]
  34. Hall, C.A.S., Cleveland, C.J., and Kaufman, R. 1986. Energy and Resource Quality, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Herendeen, R.A. 1981. Energy Intensities in Economic and Ecological Systems, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 91: 607-620.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaufmann, R.K. 1992. A Biophysical Analysis of the Energy/Real GDP Ratio: Implications for Substitution and Technical Change, Ecological Economics, 6: 35-56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kay, J. 2000. Ecosystems as Self-organizing Holarchic Open Systems: Narratives and the Second Law of Thermodynamics, in: S.E. Jorgensen and F. Muller (eds.), Handbook of Ecosystems Theories and Management, London: Lewis, pp. 135-160.Google Scholar
  38. Leontief, W.W. 1982. Academic Economics, Science, 217: 104-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lotka, A.J. 1956. Elements of Mathematical Biology, New York: Dover.MATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Martinez-Alier, J. 1987. Ecological Economics, Energy, Environment and Society, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Mayumi, K. 2001. The Origin of Ecological Economics: The Bioeconomics of Georgescu-Roegen, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Mayumi, K. and Giampietro, M. 2004. Entropy in Ecological Economics, in: J. Proops and P. Safonov (eds.), Modeling in Ecological Economics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 80-101.Google Scholar
  43. Odum, H.T. 1971. Environment, Power and Society, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Odum, H.T. 1996. Environmental Accounting: EMergy and Decision Making, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Ostwald, W. 1907. The Modern Theory of Energetics, The Monist, 17: 481-515.Google Scholar
  46. Pastore, G., Giampietro, M., and Mayumi, K. 2000. Societal Metabolism and Multiple-scales Integrated Assessment: Empirical Validation and Examples of Application, Population and Environment, 22(2): 211-254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pimentel, D. and Pimentel, M. 1979. (2nd ed. 1996). Food Energy and Society, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  48. Prigogine, I. 1978. From Being to Becoming. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  49. Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. 1981. Order out of Chaos. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  50. Ramos-Martin, J., Giampietro, M., and Mayumi, K. 2007. On China’s Exosomatic Energy Metabolism: An Application of Multi-scale Integrated Analysis of Societal Metabolism (MSIASM), Ecological Economics, 63(1): 174-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosen, R. 1958. The Representation of Biological Systems from the Standpoint of the Theory of Categories, Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 20: 317-341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schneider, E.D. and Kay, J.J. 1995. Order from Disorder: The Thermodynamics of Complexity in Biology, in: Michael P. Murphy, Luke A.J. O’Neill (eds.), What is Life: The Next Fifty Years. Reflections on the Future of Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 161-172.Google Scholar
  53. Slesser, M. 1978. Energy in the Economy, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Smil, V. 1991. General Energetics, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  55. Stone, R. 1961. Input-Output and National Accounts, Paris: OEEC.Google Scholar
  56. Stone, R. 1985. The Disaggregation of the Household Sector in the National Accounts, in: Graham Pyatt and Jeffery I. Round (eds.), Social Accounting Matrices, A Basis for Planning, Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 145-185.Google Scholar
  57. Tainter, J. 1988. The Collapse of Complex Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Ulanowicz, R.E. 1986. Growth and Development: Ecosystem Phenomenology, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  59. Ulanowicz, R.E. 1995. Ecosystem Integrity: A Causal Necessity, in: Perspectives on Ecological Integrity. Westra, L. and Lemons, J. (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 77-87.Google Scholar
  60. Watt, K. 1989. Evidence of the Role of Energy Resources in Producing Long Waves in the US Economy, Ecological Economics, 1: 181-195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. White, L.A. 1943. Energy and Evolution of Culture, American Anthropologist, 14: 335-356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. White, L.A. 1959. The Evolution of Culture: The Development of Civilization to the Fall of Rome, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  63. Zipf, G.K. 1941. National Unity and Disunity: The Nation as a Bio-Social Organism, Bloomington, IN: The Principia Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Giampietro
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Science and TechnologyUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations