Life Cycle Impacts and Total Costs of Present and Future Photovoltaic Systems: State-of-the Art and Future Outlook of a Strategic Technology Option for a Sustainable Energy System

  • Marco Raugei
  • Paolo Frankl
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

This paper provides a wide-ranging up-to-date literature review on the current state of the art of photovoltaic systems, in terms of market penetration, costs and environmental performance. It then goes on to draft three alternative scenarios for the next few decades, highlighting the four key factors influencing PV growth, i.e. cost reduction, efficiency increase, building integration and storage networks. Lastly, preliminary results are presented for greenhouse gas emissions of selected PV technologies in the years 2025 and 2050. In the light of the findings presented here, photovoltaics can be considered an inherently advantageous option for the production of “green” electricity, which may be looking at a rosy future provided that a few key conditions are met.

Keywords

Photovoltaics life cycle analysis costs scenarios NEEDS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. EPIA, 2006. Solar generation - Solar electricity for over one billion people and two million jobs by 2020. Greenpeace and European Photovoltaic Industry Association, The Netherlands/Belgium.Google Scholar
  2. EREC, 2007. Energy [r]evolution - A sustainable world energy outlook. Global energy scenario report. Greenpeace and European Renewable Energy Council, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. ETH-ESU, 1996. Ökoinventar von Energiesystemen. Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule, Energie-Stoffe-Umwelt, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  4. ExternE, 2003. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research. External costs. Research results on socio-environmental damages due to electricity and transport. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 92-894-3353-1, EUR 20198. http://www.externe.info
  5. Fthenakis, V., and Alsema, E., 2006. Photovoltaics energy payback times, greenhouse gas emissions and external costs: 2004 - early 2005 status. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 14:275-280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goetzberger, 2002. Applied solar energy. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (FhG/ISE), Germany.Google Scholar
  7. IEA/OECD, 2006. Energy technology perspectives 2006. Scenarios and strategies to 2050. IEA Publications, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Raugei, M., Bargigli, S., and Ulgiati, S., 2007. Life cycle assessment and energy pay-back time of advanced photovoltaic modules. CdTe and CIS compared to poly-Si. Energy, 32:1310-1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Raugei
    • 1
  • Paolo Frankl
    • 2
  1. 1.Ambiente Italia Research InstituteItaly
  2. 2.International Energy AgencyFrance

Personalised recommendations