Skip to main content

Alternative Interventional Study Designs

  • Chapter
Essentials of Clinical Research
  • 1756 Accesses

Abstract

There are many variations to the classical randomized controlled trial. These variations are utilized when, for a variety of reasons, the classical randomized controlled trial would be impossible, inappropriate, or impractical. Some of the variations are described in this chapter and include: equivalence and noninferiority trials; crossover trials; N of 1 trials, case-crossover trials, and externally controlled trials. Large simple trials, and prospective randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trials are discussed in another chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cited in Breslin JEcb. Quote Me. Ontario, CA: Hounslow Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel JP. Equivalence and noninferiority trials. Am Heart J. Apr 2000; 139(4):S166–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Assay Sensitivity. Wikipedia.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Snapinn SM. Noninferiority trials. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2000; 1(1):19–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. The International Conference on harmonization (ICH) Guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D’Agostino RB Sr., Massaro JM, Sullivan LM. Non-inferiority trials: design concepts and issues–the encounters of academic consultants in statistics. Stat Med. Jan 30, 2003; 22(2):169–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiens BL, Zhao W. The role of intention to treat in analysis of noninferiority studies. Clin Trials. 2007; 4(3):286–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diamond GA, Kaul S. An orwellian discourse on the meaning and measurement of noninferiority. Am J Cardiol. Jan 15, 2007; 99(2):284–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hennekens CH, Eberlein K. A randomized trial of aspirin and beta-carotene among U.S. physicians. Prev Med. Mar 1985; 14(2):165–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the women’s health initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. July 17, 2002; 288(3):321–333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol. Jan 15, 1991; 133(2):144–153.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hallqvist J, Moller J, Ahlbom A, Diderichsen F, Reuterwall C, de Faire U. Does heavy physical exertion trigger myocardial infarction? A case-crossover analysis nested in a population-based case-referent study. Am J Epidemiol. Mar 1, 2000; 151(5):459–467.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Olson CM, Fontanarosa PB. Advancing cardiac resuscitation: lessons from externally controlled trials. JAMA. Apr 7, 1999; 281(13):1220–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glasser, S.P. (2008). Alternative Interventional Study Designs. In: Glasser, S.P. (eds) Essentials of Clinical Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8486-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8486-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8485-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8486-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics