Advertisement

Approaches to Broadening the Statistics Curricula

Recently, there has been a lot of discussion about what a statistics curriculum should contain, and which elements are important for different types of students. For the most part, attention has been understandably focused on the introductory statistics course. This course services thousands of students who take only one statistics course. In the United States, the course typically fulfills a general education requirement of the university or a degree program. There has also been considerable activity regarding the use of computers to present statistical concepts and to leverage the Web and course management software to interact with students. Recently, there has been debate as to whether statisticians should make ambitious changes using resampling, the bootstrap, and simulation in place of the more traditional mathematical topics that are seen as the fundamentals or origins of the field (Cobb, 2007). It is unclear that we are achieving the goals of basic statistical literacy by focusing on formulae or even by concentrating almost exclusively on methodology. Instead, we believe the field and students would be significantly better served by showing the challenges and applicability of statistics to everyday life, policy, and scientific decision making in many contexts, and by teaching students how to think statistically and creatively.

In contrast to the activity at the introductory level, there has been much less attention paid to updating the statistics curricula for other categories of students. While smaller in number, these students—undergraduate majors and minors, masters, and doctoral students—are very important, as they are the ones who will use statistics to further the field and improve the quality of research. Other disciplines (e.g., biology, geo graphy, and political and social sciences) are increasingly appreciating the importance of statistics and including statistical material in their curricula. Further, statistics has become a broader subject and field. However, the statistics curricula at these levelshave not changed much past the introductory courses. Students taking courses for just 2 years may not see any modern statistical methods, leading them to a view that the important statistical ideas have all been developed. More importantly, few students will see how these methods are really used, and even fewer will know at the end of their studies what a statistician actually does. This is because statisticians very rarely attempt to teach this; instead, they labor over the details of various methodologies. The statistics curricula are based on presenting an intellectual infrastructure in order to understand the statistical method. This has significant consequences for improved quantitative literacy. As the practice of science and statistics research continues to change, its perspective and attitudes must also change so as to realize the field's potential and maximize the important influence that statistical thinking has on scientific endeavors. To a large extent, this means learning from the past and challenging the status quo. Instead of teaching the same concepts with varying degrees of mathematical rigor, statisticians need to address what is missing from the curricula. In our work, we look at what statistics students might do and howstatistics programs could change to allow graduates to attain their potential.

Keywords

Statistical Computing Statistical Concept Data Technology Statistic Student Computational Thinking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Statistical Association. (n.d.). Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate programs in statistical science. Retrieved May 14, 2008, from http://www.amstat.org/education/index. cfm?fuseaction = Curriculum_GuidelinesGoogle Scholar
  2. Brady, J. E.,&Allen, T. T. (2002). Case study based instruction of DOE and SPC. The American Statistician, 56(4), 312–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryce, G. R., Gould, R., Notz, W. I.,&Peck, R. L. (2001). Curriculum guidelines for bachelor of science degrees in statistical science. The American Statistician, 55(1), 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobb, G. W. (2007). The introductory statistics course: A Ptolemaic curriculum? Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1). Retrieved from http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclastat/ cts/tise/vol1/iss1/art1/Google Scholar
  5. Cobb, G. W.,&Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://cran.r-project.org/Google Scholar
  7. Gapminder. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://www.gapminder.org/Google Scholar
  8. Gelman, A.,&Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models.New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gentle, J. E. (2004). Courses in statistical computing and computational statistics. The American Statistician, 58(1), 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen, M., Nolan, D.,&Temple Lang, D. (2006, June 17–24). Data visualization and its role in the practice of statistics [second annual Undergraduate Summer Program in Statistics].Retrieved May 14, 2008, from http://summer.stat.ucla.edu/Google Scholar
  11. Hansen, M., Nolan, D.,&Temple Lang, D. (n.d.). Model courses and curricula. Retrieved May 14, 2008, from Computing in Statistics Wiki: http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/twiki/Workshop/ CompCurricGoogle Scholar
  12. Insightful Corporation. (n.d.). S-PLUS® 8 Enterprise Developer [Computer software]. Seattle,WA: Author. Available from http://www.insightful.com/Google Scholar
  13. Lange, K. (2004). Computational statistics and optimization theory at UCLA. The American Statistician, 58(1), 9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leisch, F. (2002). Sweave: Dynamic generation of statistical reports using literate data analysis.In W. Härdle&B. Rönz (Eds.), Compstat 2002: Proceedings in computational statistics (pp.575–580). Heidelberg, Germany: Physika Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Monahan, J. (2004). Teaching statistical computing at North Carolina State University. The American Statistician, 58(1), 6–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 65(2), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nolan, D.,&Speed, T. P. (1999). Teaching statistics theory through applications. The American Statistician, 53(4), 370–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nolan, D.,&Temple Lang, D. (2007). Dynamic, interactive documents for teaching statistical practice. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 295–321.Google Scholar
  19. R Development Core Team. (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing.Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  20. Rossman, A.,&Chance, B. (2003). Notes from the JSM 2003 session “Is the Math Stat course obsolete?”. Available from American Statistical Association Section on Statistical Education Website: http://www.amstat.org/sections/educ/SFPanelFinal.docGoogle Scholar
  21. Sekhon, J. S. (n.d.). Quantitative methodology in the social sciences seminar (Political Science 239 course syllabus). Available from http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/seminar/syllabus_ps239.pdfGoogle Scholar
  22. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) Working Group on CSE Education.(2001). Graduate Education in Computational Science and Engineering. SIAM Review, 43(1), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. StatLib. (n.d.). Data, software and news from the statistics community. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/Google Scholar
  24. United States National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available from http://www.nap.edu/catalog. php?record_id = 4962Google Scholar
  25. Wild, C. J. (2007). Virtual environments and the acceleration of experiential learning. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 322–335.Google Scholar
  26. Wild, C. J.,&Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 67(3), 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations