Advertisement

Avicenna’s Naturalized Epistemology and Scientific Method*

  • Jon McGinnis
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity of Science book series (LEUS, volume 11)

Abstract

This study provides a survey of Avicenna’s theoretical or abstract discussions of the methods of science and the psychological processes laying behind them as they appear in his Kitāb al-Burhān. Since that text has not been studied in-depth, the chapter is primarily exegetical, focusing what might be termed Avicenna’s ‘naturalized epistemology’. The study is divided into two sections. The first treats Avicenna’s theory of demonstrative knowledge, and how Avicenna envisions the relation between logic and science, where it is argued that one of the primary functions of Kitāb al-Burhān is to provide heuristic aids to the scientist in his investigation of the world. The second half concerns Avicenna’s empirical attitude in Kitāb al-Burhān towards acquiring the first principles of a science, where such cognitive processes as abstraction, induction and methodic experience are considered.

Keywords

Causal Relation Causal Explanation Sensory Perception Middle Term Active Intellect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamson, P.: 2004, “Non-Discursive Thought in Avicenna’s Commentary on the Theology of Aristotle” in J. McGinnis (ed.), Interpreting Avicenna: Science and Philosophy in Medieval Islam, Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science, Text and Studies, vol. 56, Brill, Leiden, pp. 87–111.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle: 1949, Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics, ed. W. D. Ross, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Avicenna: 1952, al-Madkhal, ed. T. Hussein, Publication du Minsistère de l’Instruction Publique (Culture Générale), Cairo.Google Scholar
  4. Avicenna: 1956, Kitāb al-Burhān, ed. A. E. ’Afīfī, The General Egyptian Book Organization, Cairo.Google Scholar
  5. Avicenna: 1964, Kitāb al-Qiyās, ed. S. Zāyed, Ministère de la culture, Cairo.Google Scholar
  6. Avicenna: 1966, Kitāb al-Burhān, ed. ’A. R. Badawī, 2nd edn., Association of Authorship, Translation & Publication Press, Cairo.Google Scholar
  7. Avicenna: 1971, al-Ishārāt wa-t-tanbīhāt, ed. S. Dunyā, Dār al-Ma‘ārif, Cairo.Google Scholar
  8. Avicenna: 1983, Kitāb aṭ-Ṭabī’īyāt, as-samā’ aṭ- ṭabī’ī, ed. S. Zāyed, The General Egyptian Book Organization, Cairo.Google Scholar
  9. Avicenna: 1985, Kitāb an-Najāt, ed. M. T. Dānishpazhūh, Intishārāt-i Dānishgāh-yi Tihrān, 1863, Dānishgāh-yi Tihrān, Tehran.Google Scholar
  10. Barnes, J: 1975, “Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration” in J. Barnes, M. Schofield and R. Sorabji, (eds.), Articles on Aristotle: 1,Science, Duckworth, London, pp. 65–87.Google Scholar
  11. Bertolacci, A.: 2002, “The Doctrine of Material and Formal Causality in the Ilāhiyyāt of Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Shifā’”, Quaestio 2, 125–154.Google Scholar
  12. Black, D. L.: 1993, “Estimation (Wahm) in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions”, Dialogue 32, 219–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byrne, P: 1997, Analysis and Science in Aristotle, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, H.: 1992, Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on Intellect, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Druart, T.-A.: 2005, “Metaphysics” in P. Adamson and R. C. Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 327–348.Google Scholar
  16. Al-Fārābī: 1987, Kitāb Sharā’it al-yaqīn, M. Fakhry ed., Dār al-Mashriq, Beirut, pp. 97–104.Google Scholar
  17. Ferejohn, M.: 1991, The Origins of Aristotelian Science, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, M.: 1992, “Epistemology in the Aufbau”, Synthese 93, 15–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galen: 1964, Institutio Logica, trans. J. S. Keiffer, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  20. Al-Ghazālī: 1997, Tahāfut al-falāsifa, edited and translated by M. E. Marmura, Islamic Translation Series, Brigham Young University Press, Provo, UT.Google Scholar
  21. Gutas, D.: 1988, Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition, Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works, Islamic Philosophy and Science, Texts and Studies, vol. 4, Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
  22. Gutas, D.: 2001, “Intuition and Thinking: The Evolving Structure of Avicenna’s Epistemology” in R. Wisnovsky (ed.), Aspects of Avicenna, Markus Wiener Publishers, Princeton, NJ, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
  23. Gutas, D: 2003, “Medical Theory and Scientific Method in the Age of Avicenna” in D. C. Reisman (ed.), Before and After Avicenna: Proceedings of the First Conference of the Avicenna Study Group, Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science, Text and Studies, vol. 52, Brill, Leiden, pp. 145–162.Google Scholar
  24. Gyekye, K.: 1972, “The Term Istithnā’in Arabic Logic”, Journal of the American Oriental Society 92, 88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hasse, D.: 2001, “Avicenna on Abstraction” in R. Wisnovsky (ed.), Aspects of Avicenna, Markus Wiener Publishers, Princeton, NJ, pp. 39–72.Google Scholar
  26. Jabre, F.: 1984, “Le sens de l’abstraction∈ chez Avicenne”, Mélanges de l’Université St. Joseph de Beyrouth 50, 281–310.Google Scholar
  27. Janssens, J. L.: 2004, “‘Experience’ (tajriba) in Classical Arabic Philosophy (al-Fārābī – Avicenna)”, Quaestio 4, 45–62.Google Scholar
  28. Kitcher, P.: 1992, “The Naturalists Return”, The Philosophical Review 101, 53–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kornblith, H.: 1994, “Introduction: What is Naturalistic Epistemology” in H. Kornblith (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology, 2nd edn., The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  30. Marmura, M. E.: 1975, “Avicenna’s Chapter ‘On the Relative’ in the Metaphysicsof the al-Shifā’” in G. F. Hourani (ed.), Essays on Islamic Philosophy and Science, Studies in Islamic Philosophy and Science, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp. 83–99.Google Scholar
  31. Marmura, M. E.: 1979, “Avicenna’s Chapter on Universals in the Isagoge of his al-Shifā’” in A. T. Welch and P. Cachia (eds.), Islam Past and Present Challenges: Studies in Honour of W. M. Watt, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 34–56.Google Scholar
  32. Marmura, M. E.: 1984, “The Metaphysics of Efficient Causality in Avicenna (Ibn Sina)” in M. E. Marmura (ed.), Islamic Theology and Philosophy: Studies in Honor of George F. Hourani, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp. 172–187.Google Scholar
  33. Marmura, M. E.: 1990, “The Fortuna of the Posterior Analyticsin the Arabic Middle Ages” in M. Asztalos, J. Murdoch, I. Niiniluoto (eds.), Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy, Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy (S.I.E.P.M), Helsinki 24–29 August 1987, Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 48, Yliopistopaino, Helsinki, pp. 85–103.Google Scholar
  34. Marmura, M. E.: 1992, “Quiddity and Universality in Avicenna,” in P. Morewedge (ed.), Neoplatonism and Islamic thought, Studies in Neoplatonism, vol. 5, State University of New York, Albany, NY, pp. 77–87.Google Scholar
  35. McGinnis, J.: 2003, “Scientific Methodologies in Medieval Islam”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 41, 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McGinnis, J.: 2007, “Logic and Science: The Role of the Genus and Difference in Avicenna’s Logic, Science and Natural Philosophy” in F. Del Punta (ed.), Documenti e Studi, special issue dedicated to universals.Google Scholar
  37. McKirahan, R.: 1992, Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  38. Nuseibeh, S.: 1981, “Avicenna: Medicine and Scepticism”, Koroth 8 1-2, 9–20.Google Scholar
  39. Nuseibeh: 1989, “Al-’Aql al-Qudsī: Avicenna’s Subjective Theory of Knowledge”,Studia Islamica 69, 39–54.Google Scholar
  40. Nuseibeh: 1996, “Epistemology” in S. H. Nasr and O. Leaman (eds.), History of Islamic Philosophy, Routledge History of World Philosophies, vol. 1, Routledge, London and New York, ch. 49.Google Scholar
  41. Quine, W. V. O.: 1994, “Epistemology Naturalized” reprinted in H. Kornblith (ed.), Naturalizing Epistemology, 2ed, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 15–31.Google Scholar
  42. Rescher, N.: 1966, Galen and the Syllogism, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  43. Roth, P.: 1999, “The Epistemology of ‘Epistemology Naturalized”’, Dialectica 53, 89–109.Google Scholar
  44. Shehaby, N.: 1973, The Propositional Logic of Avicenna, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht-Holland.Google Scholar
  45. Westfall, R.: 1971, The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanism and Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  46. Wians, W.: 1989, “Aristotle, Demonstration and Teaching”, Ancient Philosophy 10, 245–253.Google Scholar
  47. Wisnovsky, R.: 2002, “Final and Efficient Causality in Avicenna’s Cosmology and Theology”,Quaestio 2, 97–123.Google Scholar
  48. Wisnovsky, R.: 2000, “Notes on Avicenna’s Concept of Thingness (Shay’iyya)”, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 10, 181–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wisnovsky, R.: 2003, Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon McGinnis
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Louis Department of PhilosophyUniversity of MissouriUSA

Personalised recommendations