Implications for Psychiatry of a Thermodynamic Model of Brain Operating Far from Equilibrium

  • Walter J. Freeman

Abstract

Phenomenologists hold that perception works by the creation of meaning through chaotic dynamics that forms hypotheses about the environment, and that adapts through learning. Experimental evidence for creative thermodynamics in brains is briefly sketched. The explanation is offered that brains, being finite systems, work this way in order to cope with the infinite complexity of the world. All that brains can know is the hypotheses they construct and the results of testing them by acting into the environment, and learning by assimilation from the sensory consequences of their actions. The process is intentionality, using the action-perception cycle. The cost is the progressive isolation of individuals. Socialization and the acquisition of shared knowledge require emergence of new personality structure by self-organization through chaotic dissolution of existing structure. Dissolution is most clearly seen in crisis situations as regression to earlier stages of development. A thermodynamic model of this unlearning is proposed.

Keywords

Action-perception cycle dissipative structures ECoG electrocorti-cogram non-equilibrium thermodynamics phase transition reinforcement learning self-organized criticality unlearning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Freud S (1895) The project of a scientific psychology. Chapter in: The Origins of Psycho-Analysis. Bonaparte M, Freud A, Kris E (eds.), Mosbacher E, Strachey J (trans.). New York: Basic Books 1954.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jackson JH (1884) Evolution and dissolution of the nervous system. Lecture III. In: Taylor J (ed.) Selected Writings. New York: Basic Books 1958. p. 72.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foster M, Sherrington CS (1897) A textbook of physiology. III. the central nervous system. London: MacMillan 7th Ed., p. 929.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ryle G (1949) The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prigogine I (1980) From being to becoming: time and complexity in the physical sciences. San Francisco: W H Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freeman WJ (1975) Mass action in the nervous system. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freeman WJ (2006) Definitions of state variables and state space for brain-computer interface. Part 1. Multiple hierarchical levels of brain function. Cognitive Neurodynamics 1(1): 1871–3080 (print) 1871–4099 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11571-006-9001-x.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter J. Freeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular & Cell BiologyUniversity of California at BerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations