Skip to main content

Feature Reduction in Biosignal Processing

  • Conference paper
Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics ICCN 2007
  • 932 Accesses

Abstract

Feature reduction is common in biosignal analysis, especially in case of quantitative EEG analysis. Mostly, summation in the spectral domain is applied to reduce the number of estimated power spectral density values, which gains between four and twelve band power values. Depending on the problem, on signals under analysis and on methods used for further processing it is an open question if such a strong decrease in the number of features is optimal. Modern Soft Computing methods offer the feasibility of processing a large amount of different features without considerable performance deteriorations. In this paper we apply such methods and compare empirically the case of no feature reduction to four variants of feature reduction. Our data set consist of more than 3,700 examples of microsleep events experienced by young adults in an overnight driving simulation study. More than 4,600 features were extracted from seven EEG and two EOG channels utilizing the modified periodogram method. Results showed that summation in many fixed bands, or in fewer, but freely optimized bands is more optimal than no reduction, or strong reduction to four bands commonly selected in EEG analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Akerstedt (2000). Consensus Statement: Fatigue and Accidents in Transport Operations. J Sleep Research 9, 395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Golz, D. Sommer (2004). Automatic Recognition of Microsleep Events; Biomedizinische Technik 49, 332–333

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Sommer, et al. (2005). Fusion of State Space and Frequency-Domain Features for Improved Microsleep Detection. Proc ICANN 2005; LNCS 3697, 753–759, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Niedermeyer, F. Lopes Da Silva (1999). Electroencephalography; 4th edition, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Golz, D. Sommer, M. Chen, U. Trutschel, D. Mandic (2007). Feature Fusion for the Detection of Microsleep Events. J. VLSI Signal Process Syst 49(2), 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Bengio, et al. (2005). The Curse of Dimensionality for Local Kernel Machines. Technical Report 1258, Univ Montréal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Golz, M., Sommer, D. (2008). Feature Reduction in Biosignal Processing. In: Wang, R., Shen, E., Gu, F. (eds) Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics ICCN 2007. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8387-7_122

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics