Advertisement

Modeling Neurons of the Inferior Colliculus

  • Harry Erwin
  • Mark Elshaw
  • Adrian Rees
  • David Perez-Gonzalez
  • Stefan Wermter
Conference paper

Abstract

The MiCRAM project has been developing detailed neural models of the inferior colliculus (IC) as the basis for understanding the neural networks that underlie early auditory processing at that level. The initial phase of this project has been to develop biologically plausible models of the physiologically distinct cell types of the IC. This has led to the recognition that some of the gross behavior that produces delay sensitivity may be the result of detailed dynamic interactions between multiple channels.

Keywords

Neural modeling neurodynamics audition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rees, A., et al.: Regularity of Firing of Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology. 77 (1997) 2945–2965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson, M., et al.: GENESIS, the Caltech Neural Network Simulator. (1991) Available from: ftp://genesis.caltech.edu/Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wiener, M.C. and B.J. Richmond: Decoding Spike Trains Instant by Instant Using Order Statistics and the Mixture-of-Poissons Model. Journal of Neuroscience. 23 (2003) 2394–2406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kass, R.E. and V. Ventura: A Spike-Train Probability Model. Neural Computation. 13 (2001) 1713–1720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eden, U.T., et al.: Dynamic Analysis of Neural Encoding by Point Process Adaptive Filtering. Neural Computation. 16 (2004) 971–998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown, E.N., et al.: The Time-Rescaling Theorem and Its Application to Neural Spike Train Data Analysis. Neural Computation. 14 (2001) 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sivaramakrishnan, S. and D.L. Oliver: Distinct K Currents Result in Physiologically Distinct Cell Types in the Inferior Colliculus of Rat. Journal of Neuroscience. 21 (2001) 2861–2877.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Schutter, E. and J.M. Bower: An Active Membrane Model of the Cerebellar Purkinje Cell: I. Simulation of Current Clamps in Slice. Journal of Neurophysiology. 71 (1994) 375–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olsen, J.F.: Processing of Biosonar Information by the Medial Geniculate Body of the Mustached Bat, Pteronotus parnelli. Washington University (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simmons, J.A., et al.: Discrimination of Jittered Sonar Echoes by the Echolocating Bat, Eptesicus fuscus: the Shape of Target Images in Echolocation. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 167 (1990) 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Erwin
    • 1
  • Mark Elshaw
  • Adrian Rees
  • David Perez-Gonzalez
  • Stefan Wermter
  1. 1.School of Computing and TechnologyUniversity of SunderlandUK

Personalised recommendations