Advertisement

The Non-University Higher Education Sector in Norway

  • Svein Kyvik
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 23)

The higher education system in Norway has been continuously reformed over the last 10-15 years. This reform process started at the end of the 1980s, when many politicians seemed to regard universities and colleges as slowly adapting institutions with little ability to adjust to new social needs. The general discontent led to the establishment of a governmental commission set up in 1987 to evaluate the goals, organisation and priorities of higher education towards the years 2000–2010 (NOU 1988: 28). Nearly all aspects of higher education were discussed by the commission, including the organisation of non-university higher education. The outcome of this process was a major reorganisation of this sector in 1994. A formal binary system was established through the merging of 98 vocationally-oriented institutions into 26 state colleges (statlige høgskoler). The majority of these new institutions are multi-disciplinary and multi-programme colleges encompassing the previous specialist colleges of teacher training, engineering, health education, and social work, as well as the district colleges and various other institutions offering a specialist range of teaching programmes.

In 1995, a new Act on Universities and Colleges was approved by Parliament, and, since 1996, all public higher education institutions have been under the same act. Until 1989, most universities and specialised university institutions were regulated by separate acts, while the non-university higher education institutions were guided by governmental or ministerial regulations. Within the non-university sector, only teacher training was regulated by law. In 1989, Parliament passed an act covering all institutions in the university sector. By and large this act gave more autonomy to the universities by delegating decision-making authority on a number of issues. This process of making higher education institutions more responsible for the results of their activities was extended in the 1995 Act and in amendments to this Act in 2002. This process of delegation from the state to the higher education institutions was continued by the 2005 parliamentary approval of a new act on universities and colleges, both public and private.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution Teacher Training Academic Staff High Education System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bleiklie, I., R. Høstaker, and A. Vabø. Policy and Practice in Higher Education. Reforming Norwegian Universities. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Burgess, T. The Shape of Higher Education. London: Cornmarket Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Dimmen, Å., and S. Kyvik. “Recent Changes in the Governance of Higher Education Institutions in Norway”. Higher Education Policy 11 (1998): 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kyvik, S. “Academic Work in Norwegian Higher Education”. In Tight, M. (ed). Academic Work and Life: What It Is to be an Academic, and How This Is Changing. Amsterdam: JAI, 2000, pp. 33–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kyvik, S. “The Mmerger of Non-university Colleges in Norway”. Higher Education 44 (2002): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kyvik, S. “The Implementation of the Norwegian College Reform”. In Gornitzka, Å., M. Kogan, and A. Amaral (eds). Reform and Change in Higher Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Springer, 2004, pp. 69–82.Google Scholar
  7. Kyvik, S., and O. J. Skodvin. “Research in the Non-university Higher Education Sector–Tensions and Dilemmas”. Higher Education 45 (2003): 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kyvik, S., and J. C. Smeby. “The Academic Workplace. Country Report Norway”. In Enders, J., and E. De Weert (eds). The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft, 2004, pp. 310–331.Google Scholar
  9. Larsen, I. M. “Between Control, Rituals and Politics: The Governing Board in Higher Education Institutions in Norway”. In Amaral, A., F. A. Jones, and B. Karseth (eds). Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance, 2002, pp. 99–119.Google Scholar
  10. Lee, E. C., and F. M. Bowen. The Multicampus University. A Study of Academic Governance. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
  11. Meek, V. L., L. Goedegebure, O. Kivinen, and R. Rinne. The Mockers and Mocked: Comparative Perspectives on Differentiation, Convergence and Diversity in Higher Education. Oxford: Pergamon, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. Meyer, J., and B. Rowan. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony”. American Journal of Sociology 89 (1977): 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. NOU. Med Viten og Vilje. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. NOU. Freedom with Responsibility. On Higher Education and Research in Norway. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. Olsen, T. B., S. Kyvik, and E. Hovdhaugen. “The Promotion to Full Professor–Through Competition or by Individual Competence?” Terciary Education and Management 11 (2005): 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scott, P. “Unified and Binary Systems of Higher Education in Europe”. In Burgen, A. (ed). Goals and Purposes of Higher Education in the 21st Century. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1995, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
  17. Skodvin, O. J., and S. Kyvik. “Network Colleges in Norwegian Higher Education”. In Nordling, J. (ed). Higher Education in Remote Areas–Enrolment Trends and Network Problems. Sundsvall, Sweden: Mid-Sweden University College, 2000, pp. 83–101.Google Scholar
  18. Stensaker, B. “The Blurring Boundaries Between Accreditation and Audit–The Case of Norway”. In Schwarz, S., and D. E. Westerheijden (eds). Accreditation in the Framework of Evaluation Activities. Current Situation and Dynamics in Europe. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 2004, pp. 342–365.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Svein Kyvik
    • 1
  1. 1.Research and EducationNorway

Personalised recommendations