A Rational Approach to Bridging the Nuclear Technology Usage and Nuclear Education Gap

  • S. N. Bakhtiar
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Today’s total world energy demand is nearly 200 million B/D of oil equivalent, up five-fold from 1950. Many forecast an imminent decline in oil and gas production, but population growth and economic development push demand upward. Dramatic changes must occur in energy supply and demand beyond 2050. Major problems exist in effectively capturizing, converting, storing, transporting and utilizing different forms of energy while meeting societies’ diverse and changing economic, environmental, political, cultural, geographic and aesthetic needs. Development of technology, though difficult, is necessary and almost certainly achievable. The present paper presents a short review on past changes in technology and energy, future energy demands, future energy resources including nuclear energy and focuses on challenges in the educational arena.

Keywords

energy sources energy use energy demand educational challenges 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Department of Commerce (2002), U.S. Summary: 2000, Census 2000 Profile.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Forest & Sullivan 2002 Revenue Forecasts.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ricketts et al. (2005), Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S. 10.1073/pnas.0509060102, p.sGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2002), International Energy Outlook 2002, DOE/EIA-0484, March 2002, p. 276.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2005), International Energy Outlook, 2005, DOE/EIA-0484, July 2005, p. 194.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porter, M.E. et al. (2000), The Global Competitiveness Report 2000, World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland, Oxford University Press, 2002, ISBN-0-19-513820-1, p. 332.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (2004), Education in Nuclear Science, A Status Report and Recommendation for the Beginning of the 21st Century, DOE/NSC Nuclear Science Advisory Committee – Subcommittee on Education, November 2004, p. 175.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    IAEA (2002), Assessment of the Teaching and Application in Radiochemistry, Report-2002, IAEA.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horton, R. (2003), World Energy beyond 2050, JPT Online, University of Wisconsin-Milwukee, December 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2006), International Energy Outlook, 2006, DOE/EIA-0484, June 2006, p. 202.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huesmann, M. H. (2006). Can Advances in Science and Technology prevent Global warming? Mitigation and Adaptions Strategies for Global Change, 11: 539–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Werbos, P. J. (1993), Energy and Population: Transitional Issues and Eventual Limits, Negative Population Growth – The NPG Forum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. N. Bakhtiar
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Dynamic ChangeMoragaUSA

Personalised recommendations