While much has been written regarding the learning behaviors of students participating in online courses, little research has been conducted to ascertain whether or not students are still engaged and actually learning even when not visibly involved in online discourse with other students and faculty. This work summarizes a preliminary study of inactive students enrolled in an online graduate course, augmented by further reflections of the author, based on experience and observation of online student behaviors over a five-year period following the initial study. These findings identify how much time is spent in course related activity, what the reasons are for ‘invisibility,’ and if preferred learning styles influence their online behavior. The data shows that these students do, in fact, spend a significant amount of time in learning related tasks, even when not visibly participating, and they feel they are still learning and benefiting from this low-profile approach to their online studies. Preliminary analyses of course grades indicate that the mean grade is better for high-visibility learners than for no-visibility learners. Subsequent reflections reinforce these findings, and suggest that further research on so-called invisible learners is a critical area of investigation to better understand the dynamics of asynchronous learning and teaching at a distance.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beaudoin, M. (2002a). Learning or lurking? Tracking the ‘invisible’ online student. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147–155.
Beaudoin, M. (2002b). Finding the elusive online student. Online Classroom, 4–5.
Beaudoin, M. (2002c). From campus to cyberspace: The transition of classroom faculty to distance teaching roles. Educational Pathways, 1(6), 6.
Beaudoin, M. (2003). Is the ‘invisible’ online student learning or lurking? In E. Rubin & U. Bernath (Eds.), Reflections on teaching and learning in an online master program. A case study (pp. 121–129). Oldenburg, Germany: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystems der Universität Oldenburg. ASF Series # 6.
Dewey, J. (1971). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Fritsch, H. (1999). Host contacted, waiting for reply. In U. Bernath, & E. Rubin (Eds.), Final report and documentation of the virtual seminar for professional development in distance education (pp. 355–378). Oldenburg, Germany: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystems der Universität Oldenburg.
Fulford, C. P. & Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8–21.
Holmberg, B. (1981). Status and trends of distance education. London: Kogan Page.
Kearsley, G. (1995). The nature and value of interaction in distance education. In M. Beaudoin (Ed.), Distance Education Symposium 3: Instruction (pp. 83–92). University Park, PA: American Center for the Study of Distance Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beaudoin, M.F. (2008). Reflections on Seeking the ‘Invisible’ Online Learner. In: Visser, J., Visser-Valfrey, M. (eds) Learners in a Changing Learning Landscape. Lifelong Learning Book Series, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8299-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8299-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8298-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8299-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)