Abstract
This chapter examines the main approaches to environmental management. Command and control approaches involve standards, monitoring and enforcement of penalties by public agencies. In the last few decades it has frequently been argued that such approaches impose too many costs on both government agencies and the organisations being regulated. This has resulted in the advocacy of economic instruments which focus on an economy’s overall environmental condition rather than the performance of each economic actor. Although New Zealand has introduced an emissions trading scheme it continues to be criticised by the OECD for not making sufficient use of economic instruments. Voluntary approaches to environmental management use a mix of social marketing, education, incentives and community pressure to make organisations address their environmental impacts and to help safeguard environmental resources. Two contrasting ways of explaining policy selection are: (i) normative guidance based on the understanding of the conditions in which each type of policy approach is judged most effective; (ii) a political economy perspective that examines how choices have actually been made.
Key Questions
What is environmental management?
What are the main features of standards and permits, economic instruments and voluntary approaches?
Are there clear advantages to using one type of management approach over another or does each approach have strengths and weaknesses when applied to individual management problems?
Why is there currently much support for the use of economic instruments over other approaches to environmental management?
How does a political economy perspective explain the choice of policy approach?
What are the implications of a political economy perspective on policy choices for the future of economic instruments?
Is New Zealand devoting too little attention to economic instruments?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersen, M. (1994). Governance by green taxes: Making pollution prevention pay. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Arnold, F. S. (1995). Economic analysis of environmental policy and regulations. New York: Wiley.
Batstone, C., & Sharp, B. (1999). New Zealand’s quota management system: The first ten years. Marine Policy, 23(2), 177–190.
Bayfield, M. A., & Meister, A. (2005). East Coast forestry project review. Report to the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Wellington: MAF.
Beierle, T. (2003). The benefits and costs of environmental information disclosure: What do we know about right-to-know? (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 03–05). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Boyd, E. (2009). Governing the clean development mechanism: Global rhetoric versus local realities in carbon sequestration projects. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2380–2395.
Boyd, E., Grist, N., Juhola, S., & Nelson, V. (2009). Exploring development futures in a changing climate: Frontiers for development policy and practice. Development Policy Review, 27(6), 659–674.
Buchholz, R. (1998). Business environment and public policy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Commoner, B. (1972). The closing circle. New York: Knopf.
Congressional Budget Office. (2000). Who gains and who pays under carbon-allowance trading? The distributional effects of alternative policy designs. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
Corbera, E., & Brown, K. (2010). Offsetting benefits? Analysing access to forest carbon. Environment and Planning A, 42(7), 1739–1761.
Corbera, E., Estrada, M., & Brown, K. (2009). How do regulated and voluntary carbon-offset schemes compare? Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 6(1), 26–50.
Eden, S. (1996). Environmental issues and business implications of a changing agenda. Chichester: Wiley.
Goulder, L. H. (2000). Confronting the adverse industry impacts of carbon dioxide abatement policies: What does it cost? (Resources for the Future Issues Brief 23). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Gouldson, A., & Murphy, J. (1998). Regulatory realities: The implementation and impact of industrial environmental regulation. London: Earthscan Publications.
Guerin, K. (2004). Theory vs. reality: Making environmental use rights work in New Zealand (Treasury Working Paper 04/06). Wellington: The Treasury.
Haigh, N., & Irwin, F. (1990). Integrated pollution control in Europe and North America. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
Hoffman, A. (2005). Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. California Management Review, 47(3), 21–46.
Hussen, A. (2004). Principles of environmental economics. London: Routledge.
Industry Commission. (1997). Role of economic instruments in managing the environment (Staff Research Paper). Melbourne: Industry Commission.
Jacobs, M. (1991). The green economy: Environment, sustainable development and the politics of the future. London: Pluto Press.
Jaffe, A., Peterson, S., Portney, P., & Stavins, R. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.
James, P. (1996). Sealord and treaty settlement. In R. Le Heron & E. Pawson (Eds.), Changing places. New Zealand in the nineties. Auckland: Addison Wesley Longman.
Kaynor, E., & Howards, I. (1971). Limits on the institutional frame of reference in water resource decision making. Water Resources Bulletin, 7, 1117–1127.
Koehler, D., & Spengler, J. (2007). The toxic release inventory: Fact or fiction? A case study of the aluminium industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(2), 296–307.
Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., & Polycarp, C. (2008). Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: A comparison of carbon offset standards. Frankfurt/Main: WWF Germany.
Kossoy, K., & Ambrosi, P. (2010). The state and trends of the carbon market. Washington, DC: Environment Department, World Bank.
Kruger, J. (2005). From SO 2 to greenhouse gases trends and events shaping future emissions trading programs in the United States (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 05–20). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Labatt, S., & Maclaren, V. W. (1998). Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives: A typology and preliminary investigation. Environment and Planning C, 16, 191–209.
Landry, M., Siems, A., Stedge, G., & Abt Associates. (2005). Applying lessons learned from wetlands mitigation banking to water quality trading. Report for Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation and Office of Water. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
Lindhqvist, T. (2000). Extended producer responsibility in cleaner production policy principle to promote environmental improvements of product systems. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.
MacDonald, D. H., Connor, J., & Morrison, M. (2004). Economic instruments for managing water quality in New Zealand. Final Report for New Zealand Ministry for the Environment, Policy and Economic Research Unit. Adelaide: CSIRO Land and Water.
Nadaï, A. (1999). Conditions for the development of a product ecolabel. European Environment, 9, 202–211.
Newell, R., Jaffe, A., & Stavins, R. (1999). The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 941–975.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1994). Applying economic instruments to environmental policies in OECD and dynamic non-member countries. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2007). OECD environmental performance reviews New Zealand. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2010). OECD interim report of the green growth strategy: Implementing our commitment for a sustainable future. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2011). Economic survey New Zealand. Paris: OECD.
Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (PCE). (2006). Changing behaviour: Economic instruments in the management of waste. Wellington: PCE.
Parry, I. (2002). Are tradable permits a good idea? (Resources for the Future Issues Brief 02–33). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Pearce, D., & Warford, J. (1993). World without end. New York: Oxford University Press.
Saunders, C., & Barber, A. (2008). Carbon footprints, life cycle analysis, food miles – Global trade trends and market issues. Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 73–88.
Sinner, J., & Fenemor, A. (2005). The adoption of ITQ for New Zealand’s inshore fisheries (Ecologic Research Report 4). Nelson: Ecologic Foundation.
Stavins, R. (2003). Market-based environmental policies: What can we learn from US experience (and related research)? (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 03–43). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Stephan, M. (2002). Environmental information disclosure programs: They work, but why? Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 281–298.
Sterner, T. (2003). Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Tietenberg, T. H. (1998). Disclosure strategies for pollution control. In T. Sterner (Ed.), The market and the environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Tribunal, W. (1988). Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Muriwhenua fishing claim (Wai 22). Wellington: Waitangi Tribunal.
West, K. (1995). Ecolabels: The industrialization of environmental standards. The Ecologist, 25(1), 16–20.
Wright, J. (2011). Emissions trading scheme review. Wellington: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Freitas, C.R., Perry, M. (2012). Alternative Approaches to Environmental Management. In: New Environmentalism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8254-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8254-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8253-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8254-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)