Skip to main content

Alternative Approaches to Environmental Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Environmentalism

Abstract

This chapter examines the main approaches to environmental management. Command and control approaches involve standards, monitoring and enforcement of penalties by public agencies. In the last few decades it has frequently been argued that such approaches impose too many costs on both government agencies and the organisations being regulated. This has resulted in the advocacy of economic instruments which focus on an economy’s overall environmental condition rather than the performance of each economic actor. Although New Zealand has introduced an emissions trading scheme it continues to be criticised by the OECD for not making sufficient use of economic instruments. Voluntary approaches to environmental management use a mix of social marketing, education, incentives and community pressure to make organisations address their environmental impacts and to help safeguard environmental resources. Two contrasting ways of explaining policy selection are: (i) normative guidance based on the understanding of the ­conditions in which each type of policy approach is judged most effective; (ii) a political economy perspective that examines how choices have actually been made.

Key Questions

What is environmental management?

What are the main features of standards and permits, economic instruments and voluntary approaches?

Are there clear advantages to using one type of management approach over another or does each approach have strengths and weaknesses when applied to individual management problems?

Why is there currently much support for the use of economic instruments over other approaches to environmental management?

How does a political economy perspective explain the choice of policy approach?

What are the implications of a political economy perspective on policy choices for the future of economic instruments?

Is New Zealand devoting too little attention to economic instruments?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, M. (1994). Governance by green taxes: Making pollution prevention pay. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, F. S. (1995). Economic analysis of environmental policy and regulations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batstone, C., & Sharp, B. (1999). New Zealand’s quota management system: The first ten years. Marine Policy, 23(2), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayfield, M. A., & Meister, A. (2005). East Coast forestry project review. Report to the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Wellington: MAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beierle, T. (2003). The benefits and costs of environmental information disclosure: What do we know about right-to-know? (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 03–05). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, E. (2009). Governing the clean development mechanism: Global rhetoric versus local realities in carbon sequestration projects. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2380–2395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, E., Grist, N., Juhola, S., & Nelson, V. (2009). Exploring development futures in a changing climate: Frontiers for development policy and practice. Development Policy Review, 27(6), 659–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, R. (1998). Business environment and public policy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, B. (1972). The closing circle. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office. (2000). Who gains and who pays under carbon-allowance trading? The distributional effects of alternative policy designs. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbera, E., & Brown, K. (2010). Offsetting benefits? Analysing access to forest carbon. Environment and Planning A, 42(7), 1739–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbera, E., Estrada, M., & Brown, K. (2009). How do regulated and voluntary carbon-offset schemes compare? Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 6(1), 26–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, S. (1996). Environmental issues and business implications of a changing agenda. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulder, L. H. (2000). Confronting the adverse industry impacts of carbon dioxide abatement policies: What does it cost? (Resources for the Future Issues Brief 23). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldson, A., & Murphy, J. (1998). Regulatory realities: The implementation and impact of industrial environmental regulation. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, K. (2004). Theory vs. reality: Making environmental use rights work in New Zealand (Treasury Working Paper 04/06). Wellington: The Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, N., & Irwin, F. (1990). Integrated pollution control in Europe and North America. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (2005). Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. California Management Review, 47(3), 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussen, A. (2004). Principles of environmental economics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Industry Commission. (1997). Role of economic instruments in managing the environment (Staff Research Paper). Melbourne: Industry Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1991). The green economy: Environment, sustainable development and the politics of the future. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Peterson, S., Portney, P., & Stavins, R. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, P. (1996). Sealord and treaty settlement. In R. Le Heron & E. Pawson (Eds.), Changing places. New Zealand in the nineties. Auckland: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaynor, E., & Howards, I. (1971). Limits on the institutional frame of reference in water resource decision making. Water Resources Bulletin, 7, 1117–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, D., & Spengler, J. (2007). The toxic release inventory: Fact or fiction? A case study of the aluminium industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(2), 296–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., & Polycarp, C. (2008). Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: A comparison of carbon offset standards. Frankfurt/Main: WWF Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossoy, K., & Ambrosi, P. (2010). The state and trends of the carbon market. Washington, DC: Environment Department, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J. (2005). From SO 2 to greenhouse gases trends and events shaping future emissions trading programs in the United States (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 05–20). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labatt, S., & Maclaren, V. W. (1998). Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives: A typology and preliminary investigation. Environment and Planning C, 16, 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, M., Siems, A., Stedge, G., & Abt Associates. (2005). Applying lessons learned from ­wetlands mitigation banking to water quality trading. Report for Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation and Office of Water. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindhqvist, T. (2000). Extended producer responsibility in cleaner production policy principle to promote environmental improvements of product systems. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, D. H., Connor, J., & Morrison, M. (2004). Economic instruments for managing water quality in New Zealand. Final Report for New Zealand Ministry for the Environment, Policy and Economic Research Unit. Adelaide: CSIRO Land and Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadaï, A. (1999). Conditions for the development of a product ecolabel. European Environment, 9, 202–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R., Jaffe, A., & Stavins, R. (1999). The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 941–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1994). Applying economic instruments to environmental policies in OECD and dynamic non-member countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2007). OECD environmental performance reviews New Zealand. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2010). OECD interim report of the green growth strategy: Implementing our commitment for a sustainable future. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2011). Economic survey New Zealand. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (PCE). (2006). Changing behaviour: Economic instruments in the management of waste. Wellington: PCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, I. (2002). Are tradable permits a good idea? (Resources for the Future Issues Brief 02–33). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D., & Warford, J. (1993). World without end. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C., & Barber, A. (2008). Carbon footprints, life cycle analysis, food miles – Global trade trends and market issues. Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinner, J., & Fenemor, A. (2005). The adoption of ITQ for New Zealand’s inshore fisheries (Ecologic Research Report 4). Nelson: Ecologic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavins, R. (2003). Market-based environmental policies: What can we learn from US experience (and related research)? (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 03–43). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, M. (2002). Environmental information disclosure programs: They work, but why? Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner, T. (2003). Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T. H. (1998). Disclosure strategies for pollution control. In T. Sterner (Ed.), The market and the environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribunal, W. (1988). Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Muriwhenua fishing claim (Wai 22). Wellington: Waitangi Tribunal.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, K. (1995). Ecolabels: The industrialization of environmental standards. The Ecologist, 25(1), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. (2011). Emissions trading scheme review. Wellington: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Freitas, C.R., Perry, M. (2012). Alternative Approaches to Environmental Management. In: New Environmentalism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8254-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics