Skip to main content

It is argued that there is a need for a hydrological assessment to be undertaken at the design stage of wetlands, which are to be constructed for wastewater treatment, in order to ensure their long-term sustainability. A simple water budget provides a suitable tool for this purpose. The product of an appropriate crop coefficient (Kc), and the reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) determined from meteorological data, is deemed a suitable procedure for determining the evapotranspiration component of the water budget. The UK and the Czech Republic are taken as case studies, representative of maritime and mid-continent climates, to illustrate a procedure for identifying regions where created wetlands are potentially at most risk from water deficits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHMI Climatology Section. (2006). Information about climate, Retrieved March 31, 2006, from http://www.chmi.cz/meteo/ok/infklime.html

  • Doorenbos, J., & Pruitt, W.O. (1977). Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, R.J. (2001). IDRISI for Windows User’s Guide Version 2. Worcester, MA: Clark Labs, Clark University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermor, P.M. (1997). Establishment of a reedbed within a created surface water fed wetland nature reserve. Dissertation, Aston University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermor, P.M., Hedges, P.D., Gilbert, J.C., & Gowing, D.J.G. (2001). Reedbed transpiration rates in England. Hydrological Processes, 18, 621–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., Palmer, S., Weir, A., Lee, M., & Barrie, I. (1996). The Meteorological Office Rainfall and Evaporation Calculation System: MORECS Version 2.0. An update to Hydrological Memorandum 45. Bracknell, UK: Meteorological Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, R.H., & Knight, R.L. (1996). Treatment wetlands. New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith, J.L. (1965). Radiation and crops. Experimental Agricultural Review, 1, 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, P.M., Boon, A.G., & Rowell, M.R. (1997). Review of the design and management of constructed wetlands, Report 180. London: CIRIA, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E.M. (1994). Hydrology in practice, 3rd edn. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hedges, P.D., Fermor, P.M., Dušek, J. (2008). The Hydrological Sustainability of Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. In: Vymazal, J. (eds) Wastewater Treatment, Plant Dynamics and Management in Constructed and Natural Wetlands. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8235-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics