Skip to main content

Organization and Leadership in Education: Changing Direction

  • Chapter
  • 3333 Accesses

The purpose of this chapter is to raise some issues about the current direction of the field of study and training that is now commonly referred to as ‘educational leadership and management’ (ELM). It is intended as an agenda-setting chapter, opening up a number of more or less connected topics which the author considers worthy of debate by members of the field’s academic community and their collaborators in the worlds of policy and practice. The discussion will lead to a number of proposals for refocusing and reorienting our work. The issues will be discussed under three broad headings, the first of which will receive most attention.

  1. 1.

    Does the field need a change of direction towards organization?

  2. 2.

    What are some key features of the current context?

  3. 3.

    How might we move forward?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, R. and Grogan, M. (2005) ‘Form should follow function: removing the EdD from the PhD straight jacket’, UCEA Review, Spring, 10-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C.I. (1938) The Functions of the Executive (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2006) Speech to News Corporation Employees, Pebble Beach, CA, 30 July, downloaded from www.number-10.gov.uk, accessed 1 August 2006.

  • Blau, P.M. and Scott, W.R. (1963) Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach (London, Routledge/Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E. (1991) Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottery, M. (2004) The Challenges of Educational Leadership (London, Paul Chapman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundrett, M. (2000) Beyond Competence: The Challenge for Educational Management (Dereham, Norfolk, UK, Peter Francis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. (1961) The Management of Innovation (London, Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T., Bell, L., Bolam, R., Glatter, R. and Ribbins, R. (1999) Educational Management: Redefining Theory, Policy and Practice (London, Paul Chapman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F.(2003) The Hidden Connections: A Science for Sustainable Living (London, Flamingo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulkin, S. (2004) ‘Take aim: You’ll always miss’ The Observer, 14 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. (2002) System Failure: Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently (London, Demos).

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G. (1997) Hare Brain, Tortoise Mind: Why Intelligence Increases When You Think Less (London, Fourth Estate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R., Hardy, C., Nord, W.R. and Lawrence, T. (2006) Handbook of Organization Studies, Second Edition (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbyn, Z. (2006) ‘Metrics is such a blunt instrument’, The Guardian, 12 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. with Huber, J. and Lownsbrough, H. (2004) School’s Out: Can Teachers, Social Workers and Health Staff Learn to Live Together? (London, Demos/Hay Group).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, G.M. (2004) ‘The national college for school leadership: A North American perspective on opportunities and challenges’, Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 32 (3), 289-307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, R.L., Boyd, W.L. and Mawhinney, H.B. (1996) The Politics of Education and the New Institutionalism: Reinventing the American School (London, Falmer).

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES (2004) 14-19 Curriculum and Qualifications Reform: Final Report of the Working Group on 14-19 Reform (London, Department for Education and Skills).

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P., Evans, J., Collarbone, P., Gold, A. and Halpin, D. (2002) Establishing the Current State of School Leadership in England (London, Department for Education and Skills, Research Report 336).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1961) A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations (New York, Free Press of Glencoe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Every Child Matters (2003) Cm. 5860 (London, The Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, F.E. (1967) A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness (New York, McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C. (2005) Why Are We So Badly Governed? (London, Public Management and Policy Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotony, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott., P. and Trow, M. (2000) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glancey, J. (2006) ‘A classroom with a view’, The Guardian, 20 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatter, R. (1996) ‘Managing dilemmas in education: The tightrope walk of strategic choice in more autonomous institutions’ in S.L. Jacobson, E. Hickox and R. Stevenson (eds.), School Administration: Persistent Dilemmas in Preparation and Practice (Westport, CT, Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatter, R. (1997) ‘Context and capability in educational management’, Educational Management and Administration, 25(2), 181-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glatter, R. (2004) ‘Leadership and leadership development in education’ in J. Storey (ed.), Leadership and Leadership Development in Education (London, Routledge), 203-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatter, R., Castle, F., Cooper, D., Evans, J. and Woods, P.A. (2005) ‘What’s new? Identifying innovation arising from school collaboration initiatives’, Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 33(4), 381-399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, G. (1995) School Leadership - Beyond Education Management: An Essay in Policy Scholarship (London, Falmer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C. (2005) Studying Organizations (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P.(2000)‘Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership’, Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. (2004) ‘Rethinking education: The consequences of chaos theory’, paper presented to the British Educational Leadership, Management and Administration Society Annual Conference, Stone, Staffordshire, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (2003) Education Epidemic: Transforming Secondary Schools Through Innovation Networks (London, Demos).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2005) Crossing Boundaries and Breaking Barriers: Distributing Leadership in Schools (London, Specialist Schools Trust).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H. and Hallinger, P. (2005) ‘The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today?’, Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 33 (2), 229-244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E. (1969) ‘Organization theory and educational administration’ in G. Baron and W. Taylor (eds.), Educational Administration and the Social Sciences (London, The Athlone Press), 36-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E. (2003) Book review (2002), Educational Management and Administration, 31(2), 213-216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E. and Wallace, M. (2005) Educational Leadership: Ambiguity, Professionals and Managerialism (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. (2004) Big Bang Localism: A Rescue Plan for British Democracy (London, Policy Exchange).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B.L. (2004) ‘Where have all the flowers gone? Reconnecting leadership preparation with the field of organization theory’, UCEA Review, 16-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M. (2002) ‘The subordination of local government and the compliant society’, Oxford Review of Education, 28(2/3), 331-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. and Steinbach, R. (1999) Changing Leadership for Changing Times (Buckingham, UK, Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. and Levin, B. (2005) Assessing School Leader and Leadership Programme Effects on Pupil Learning (London, Department for Education and Skills, Research Report 662).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levačié and Glatter, R. (2003) ‘Developing evidence-informed policy and practice in educa-tional leadership and management: A way forward’ in L. Anderson and N. Bennett (eds.), Developing Educational Leadership: Using Evidence for Policy and Practice (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (2000) ‘Exploring paradox: Towards a more comprehensive guide’, The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760-776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. (1986) ‘Busy Izzy in search of truth’, New Statesman, 15 August, 18-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V. and Wilson, D. (2003) ‘Balancing revisability and robustness? A new institutionalist perspective on local government modernization, Public Administration, 81(2), 275-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumby, J., Foskett, N. and Maringe, F. (2003) ‘Restricted view: School leadership and the “choices” of learners’, presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Management and Administration Society, Milton Keynes, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, R. (2005) ‘Social justice and school improvement: Improving the quality of schooling in the poorest neighbourhoods’, British Educational Research Journal, 31(5), 589-604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCabe, C. (2005) ‘Set our universities free’, The Observer, 13 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, D. (2005) ‘The hit parade’, The Guardian, 14 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, W.J.M. (1967) Politics and Social Science (London, Penguin Books)

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Simon, H.A. (1958) Organizations (New York, Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquand, D. (2004) Decline of the Public: The Hollowing-out of Citizenship (London, Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C., Hall, V. and Mackay, H. (1983) The Selection of Secondary School Headteachers (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997) Images of Organization (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, K. (2002) School Leadership and Complexity Theory (London & New York: Routledge Falmer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, R.T. and Bossert, S.T. (1997) ‘Leadership as an organizational quality’ in M. Crawford, L. Kydd and C. Riches (eds.), Leadership and Teams in Educational Management (Buckingham, UK, Open University Press), 9-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1972) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (Glenview, IL, Scott Foresman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R.I. (2006) Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-based Management (Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, P. (2005) ‘Bureaucracy is fine for them, not us’, The Guardian, 3 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • PriceWaterhouse Coopers (2003) Academies Evaluation Annual Report November 2003 (London, Department for Education and Skills).

    Google Scholar 

  • PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2005) Academies Evaluation 2nd Annual Report (London, Department for Education and Skills).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S., Farrell, C., Peim, N. and Smith, P. (2005) ‘Does governance matter for school improvement?’ School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(3), 305-325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynor, A. (2004) Individual Schools, Unique Solutions: Tailoring Approaches to School Leadership (London, Routledge/Falmer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V.M.J. (2001) ‘Embedding leadership in task performance’ in K. Wong and C. W. Evers (eds.), Leadership for Quality Schooling: International Perspectives (London, Routledge/Falmer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner (New York, Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations, Second Edition (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. and Luck, A. (2005) ‘Kelly lays down food law’ The Times Educational Supplement, 7 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1970) The Theory of Organizations (London, Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J., Brown, J., Knibbs, S. and Smith, J. (2005) Follow-up Research into the State of School Leadership in England (London, Department for Education and Skills, Research Report 633).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, M. and Willmott, R. (2003) Education Management in Managerialist Times: Beyond the Textual Apologists (Maidenhead, UK, Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. and Fertig, M. (2006) ‘Applying complexity theory to public service change: Creating chaos out of order?’ in M. Wallace, M. Fertig and E. Schneller (eds.), Managing Change in the Public Services (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. and Hoyle, E. (2005) ‘Towards effective management of a reformed teaching profes-sion’, paper presented at the fourth seminar of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Teaching and Learning Research Programme thematic seminar series ‘Changing Teacher Roles, Identities and Professionalism’, King’s College, London, July. Wallace, M. and Pocklington, K. (2002) Managing Complex Educational Change: Large-scale Reorganization of Schools (London, Routledge/Falmer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggans, K. (2005) ‘Should the research assessment exercise be scrapped?’ The Independent, 26 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P.A. (2004) ‘Democratic leadership: Drawing distinctions with distributed leadership’, International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7(1), 3-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P.A. (2005) Democratic Leadership in Education (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P.A., Bagley, C. and Glatter, R. (1998) School Choice and Competition: Markets in the Public Interest? (London, Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P.A., Ashley, M. and Woods, G.J. (2005a) Steiner Schools in England (London, Department for Education and Skills, Research Report 645).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P.A., Castle, F., Cooper, D., Evans, J., Levacie, R. and Glatter, R. (2005b) ‘Deep collabo-ration? Developing new collaborative relationships amongst schools in a time of specialization and diversity’, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association (BERA), University of Glamorgan, Wales, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1965) Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glatter, R. (2008). Organization and Leadership in Education: Changing Direction. In: Johnson, D., Maclean, R. (eds) Teaching: Professionalization, Development and Leadership. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8186-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics